Holyrood, made browsable

Motions, questions and answers

Every motion, amendment, parliamentary question and answer the chamber has lodged since 1999, searchable in one place.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
305,439
Motions and questions
84,137
Motions
234,089
Questions
Chamber activity

Motions, questions and answers

Last 30 days
292 motions
956 questions · up to 16 Jun 2026
Most-active MSP
23 motions in the last 30 days
Top topic
in 257 titles
Unanswered questions
568
Items shown
0
Motions
0
Questions
0

Covering Unknown to Unknown. 5,653 amendments linked to their parent motions. 59,985,316 recorded MSP supports. 2,901 divisions on record (1,666 carried, 1,208 defeated).

Most common

What kinds of items appear

Written Question 206,214 Standard Motion 63,175 Portfolio Question 10,776 General Question 9,020 Motion For Debate 5,277 Members' Business Motion 5,213 Bureau Motion 5,029 Amendment 3,793 First Minister's Question 3,585 SPCB Written Question 1,621 Inspired Question 1,589 Topical Question 983
Year by year

How many items per year

Showing 0 of 0 matching items in session S6, 10 Jun 2025 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 1,285.
Reference Item MSP Type Date (desc)
Nothing matches those filters — try a broader search or clear a filter.
← Back to list
Question

Untitled item

S6W-13103 · Written Question · lodged by Burgess, Ariane

Lodged on
08 Dec 2022
Heard / answered on
23 Dec 2022
To ask the Scottish Government whether a fish farm company application for a European Protected Species Licence to use Acoustic Deterrent Devices (ADDs) or Acoustic Startle Devices (ASDs) would be refused unless the applicant has provided strong and robust evidence that all alternatives such as fitment of double skinned anti-predator nets, recirculating aquaculture systems, semi-closed containment and/or relocation of the farm have been tried.

The answer

A licence to disturb European protected species (“EPS”) can only be granted if three licensing tests are met, including that there is no satisfactory alternative to the proposed action.
Marine Scotland has published a document that provides guidance and advice for any aquaculture production business that wishes to apply for a licence to disturb EPS as a result of ADD use –
faq_adds_and_eps_including_annex_1_and_annex_2_-_version_5_-october_2021_-_final.pdf (marine.gov.scot) . Applicants are required to provide an analysis of alternative methods of predator control tried or considered and if they have been discounted provide reasons for this. All EPS licence applications are considered on a cases by case basis and it would not be appropriate to pre-determine the outcome of the satisfactory alternative test without consideration of any justification provided by the applicant.

Answered by Mairi Gougeon on 23 Dec 2022.