Holyrood, made browsable

Motions, questions and answers

Every motion, amendment, parliamentary question and answer the chamber has lodged since 1999, searchable in one place.

Chamber activity

Motions, questions and answers

Last 30 days
8 motions
40 questions · up to 14 May 2026
Most-active MSP
3 motions in the last 30 days
Top topic
in 24 titles
Unanswered questions
72
Items shown
0
Motions
0
Questions
0

Covering Unknown to Unknown. 5,653 amendments linked to their parent motions. 4,903,788 recorded MSP supports. 2,901 divisions on record (1,652 carried, 1,188 defeated).

Most common

What kinds of items appear

Written Question 205,373 Standard Motion 62,939 Portfolio Question 10,757 General Question 8,984 Motion For Debate 5,266 Members' Business Motion 5,191 Bureau Motion 5,015 Amendment 3,755 First Minister's Question 3,570 SPCB Written Question 1,616 Inspired Question 1,589 Topical Question 983
Year by year

How many items per year

Showing 0 of 0 matching items in session S6, 17 May 2025 – 17 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 48.
Reference Item MSP Type Date (desc)
Nothing matches those filters — try a broader search or clear a filter.
← Back to list
Question

Untitled item

S6W-12998 · Written Question · lodged by Cameron, Donald

Lodged on
05 Dec 2022
Heard / answered on
20 Dec 2022
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-12376 by Mairi McAllan on 1 December 2022, whether it applied any monitoring and evaluation criteria to the initial £2 million of loss and damage funding that was announced on 11 November 2021, prior to funding being awarded to projects.

The answer

The Scottish Government undertakes monitoring and evaluation of all funded programmes once they are live. Monitoring and evaluation is used to assess progress against agreed targets so can only be done once a project has started and there is progress to assess.
For the £1.7 million worth of funded projects, and in line with standard Scottish Government grant-management practice, we hold monthly update conversations and formally assess progress on a quarterly basis based on formal progress reports. Project specific monitoring and evaluation plans are developed based on each individual grant’s objectives to determine indicators that will accurately measure progress.
Our programmes seek to empower communities to identify the priorities to be addressed through climate justice support and to build resilience to the local material and social impacts of climate change that they have identified. Fundamental in achieving that resilience is through our future programmes mainstreaming communities participation in programme implementation, monitoring and evaluation. This means communities, including the most marginalised within communities, participate in determining and monitoring the metrics and baselines by which a programme is deemed a success.
Our future programmes seek to mainstream communities participation in programme implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Our upcoming £24m Climate Just Communities programme will ensure that communities, including the most marginalised within communities, participate in determining and monitoring the metrics and baselines by which a programme is deemed a success.

Answered by Mairi McAllan on 20 Dec 2022.