Holyrood, made browsable

Motions, questions and answers

Every motion, amendment, parliamentary question and answer the chamber has lodged since 1999, searchable in one place.

Chamber activity

Motions, questions and answers

Last 30 days
8 motions
40 questions · up to 14 May 2026
Most-active MSP
3 motions in the last 30 days
Top topic
in 24 titles
Unanswered questions
72
Items shown
0
Motions
0
Questions
0

Covering Unknown to Unknown. 5,653 amendments linked to their parent motions. 4,903,788 recorded MSP supports. 2,901 divisions on record (1,652 carried, 1,188 defeated).

Most common

What kinds of items appear

Written Question 205,373 Standard Motion 62,939 Portfolio Question 10,757 General Question 8,984 Motion For Debate 5,266 Members' Business Motion 5,191 Bureau Motion 5,015 Amendment 3,755 First Minister's Question 3,570 SPCB Written Question 1,616 Inspired Question 1,589 Topical Question 983
Year by year

How many items per year

Showing 0 of 0 matching items in session S6, 17 May 2025 – 17 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 48.
Reference Item MSP Type Date (desc)
Nothing matches those filters — try a broader search or clear a filter.
← Back to list
Question

Untitled item

S6W-05035 · Written Question · lodged by Lennon, Monica

Lodged on
07 Dec 2021
Heard / answered on
23 Dec 2021
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will investigate the National Advisory Committee for Chronic Pain, in light of reports of bullying allegations and the resignation of seven of the 10 elected patient representatives, and what impact this will have on the draft framework for pain management service delivery that was published for consultation on 6 December 2021.

The answer

Claims of bullying behaviour by civil servants are untrue. All members of the National Advisory Committee for Chronic Pain (NACCP) are free to make whatever contribution they wish to discussions.
All committee members are required to abide by the behaviours set out in the Terms of Reference, including the values of respect and mutual collaboration to agree recommendations to help improve care for people with chronic pain. If these behaviours and values were not met, this would be taken very seriously and addressed.
As at December 2021 four representatives of the Chronic Pain Patient Reference Group attending the NACCP had written to officials to resign their positions. Two resignations took place in June 2021, with one in each of October and November 2021. It would not be appropriate to divulge the specific reasons cited by each individual, however I am clear that officials acted on the relevant feedback provided.
For example, as a result we are currently reviewing existing stakeholder engagement processes and structures around our work on chronic pain, including the role of the NACCP. The outcome of this work is intended to ensure meaningful engagement to support the future delivery and implementation of the Framework for Pain Management Service Delivery following completion of the current public consultation.

Answered by Maree Todd on 23 Dec 2021.