Holyrood, made browsable

Motions, questions and answers

Every motion, amendment, parliamentary question and answer the chamber has lodged since 1999, searchable in one place.

Chamber activity

Motions, questions and answers

Last 30 days
8 motions
40 questions · up to 14 May 2026
Most-active MSP
3 motions in the last 30 days
Top topic
in 24 titles
Unanswered questions
72
Items shown
0
Motions
0
Questions
0

Covering Unknown to Unknown. 5,653 amendments linked to their parent motions. 4,903,788 recorded MSP supports. 2,901 divisions on record (1,652 carried, 1,188 defeated).

Most common

What kinds of items appear

Written Question 205,373 Standard Motion 62,939 Portfolio Question 10,757 General Question 8,984 Motion For Debate 5,266 Members' Business Motion 5,191 Bureau Motion 5,015 Amendment 3,755 First Minister's Question 3,570 SPCB Written Question 1,616 Inspired Question 1,589 Topical Question 983
Year by year

How many items per year

Showing 0 of 0 matching items in session S6, 16 May 2025 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 48.
Reference Item MSP Type Date (desc)
Nothing matches those filters — try a broader search or clear a filter.
← Back to list
Question

Untitled item

S5W-20395 · Written Question · lodged by Finnie, John

Lodged on
05 Dec 2018
Heard / answered on
18 Dec 2018
To ask the Scottish Government whether the system of procurator fiscal warnings is ECHR-compliant.

The answer

The published Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service Prosecution Code sets out the criteria for prosecutorial decisions and the range of options available to prosecutors dealing with reports of crime.
In many cases, where there is sufficient evidence to justify proceedings, a prosecution will be appropriate and, in that event, the prosecutor will commence and pursue proceedings in the appropriate forum. The Prosecution Code articulates a general rule that cases should be taken in the lowest competent Court unless there is some good reason for prosecuting in a higher Court. This proposition reflects an underlying principle: that the response of the criminal justice system should be proportionate.
The Prosecution Code recognises that prosecutors have other options, commonly described as alternatives to prosecution, which, in particular circumstances, and especially in relation to less serious offending behaviour, may effectively and proportionately reflect the public interest. These alternatives to prosecution include warnings by the Procurator Fiscal, diversion from prosecution, fiscal fines, fiscal compensation orders, combined fiscal fines & compensation orders, and fiscal work orders. Apart from warnings and diversions, these are provided for in statute.
The Prosecution Code sets out factors which may, depending on the circumstances of the particular case, be relevant in determining what action is in the public interest. These include, among other things, the nature and gravity of the offence; the impact of the offence on the victims and witnesses; the age, background and circumstances of the accused; the actions of the victims; the motive for the crime; and the risk of further offending. The weight to be attached to any particular consideration will depend upon the circumstances of the individual case.
The use of such alternatives to prosecution, including warnings, is a common feature of European jurisdictions. The system complies with the European Convention on Human Rights.

Answered by James Wolffe QC on 18 Dec 2018.