Holyrood, made browsable

How they voted

A single division, with every MSP's vote — For, Against, Abstain, or Not Voted — grouped by party.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
Division · amendment

Concerns about Rail Proposals

S4M-02086.1 · decided 23 Feb 2012 · lodged by Brown, Keith · session S4
Watch the debate on SPTV
Carried 64/54
As an amendment to motion S4M-02086 in the name of Richard Baker (Concerns about Rail Proposals), leave out from “the concerns” to end and insert “that Rail 2014 – Public Consultation gave members of the public, communities, businesses and organisations an opportunity to set out their aspirations for Scotland’s railways; notes that the Scottish Government will give due consideration to all responses to the consultation; acknowledges the repeated assurances of the Scottish Government that there has never been any intention, nor are there any plans, to close railway stations in Glasgow or indeed elsewhere in Scotland, and welcomes the Scottish Government’s record of investment and improvement in Scotland’s railway by including, for example, the reopening of the Airdrie to Bathgate railway, major improvements to Dalmarnock station, improvements to the Paisley corridor, new class 380 electric trains for Ayrshire and Inverclyde, the ongoing improvements to Waverley steps, additional services on the Highland Main Line, increased accessibility at stations across Scotland, the forthcoming Borders Rail project, the Edinburgh-Glasgow Improvement Programme and the commitment to invest a minimum of £50 million in new sleeper trains.”

Vote heatmap · 128 MSPs

Each cell is one MSP. Hover or tap for details.

  • Yes
  • No
  • Abstain
  • Not voted
Abstain 0

No-one in this bucket.