Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee 09 December 2025
It is fantastic that the Scottish Government is supportive of the general principles of the bill. For a number of years, we have had discussions about the direction of travel with ecocide law internationally, particularly given the decision that has been taken by the EU. I am very aware of the Scottish Government’s policy to keep pace with the EU.
We wanted to explore how the current regulations work and whether simply amending the RRA, if that were possible, would be sufficient. My position is that that would not be sufficient. As I touched on in my opening remarks, the RRA includes a strict liability offence, whereas, as I hope the committee has learned through this process, when we talk about ecocide offences, we are talking about events that cause the most severe environmental harm, which would probably happen only once every 10 to 20 years.
In relation to the gravity of the harm and of the penalties, the bill differs from the RRA because, under the bill, it must be proven that the guilty party had a guilty mind when carrying out a guilty act. That is not the case under the RRA in relation to strict liability. Under the bill, it must be proven that someone acted with intent or recklessness, and it is right that there should be that test, because we consulted on the punishment being up to 20 years in prison, which the public have said that they support.
For other reasons that the committee is aware of, the Government or the Parliament could amend the RRA to increase the penalties, but that would not fundamentally change the offence—it would still be a strict liability offence.
I prefer to think of this as a regulatory pyramid, which has been mentioned by other stakeholders, including the Environmental Rights Centre for Scotland. It is not about having one or the other. I hope that having an ecocide offence at the apex of the pyramid will strengthen the RRA. Obviously, I will consider the amendments that are lodged, but, fundamentally, we need both a stand-alone bill on ecocide and the RRA to operate properly. I know that people have concerns about the enforceability of provisions in the RRA, given the low number of prosecutions. However, the need for a separate offence has come through in the consultation and in a lot of the evidence on the bill.