Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,354,908
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 60 of 2,354,908 contributions. Latest 30 days: 0. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 25 Mar 2026.
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Chamber
26 Mar 2025
Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Some people hold the view that it does not matter who owns Scotland’s land. They do not mind that Scotland’s pattern of private land ownership is probably the most concentrated in the world. Some people are relaxed that anyone in the world can buy large amounts of land in Scot...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Chamber
25 May 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I am pleased to have the opportunity to speak in the debate to agree the general principles of the Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill. I am one of the members of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee and, as members have heard, we have taken extensive eviden...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
07 Nov 2018
Planning (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Every time the committee has debated the Planning (Scotland) Bill, I have needed to refer to my entry in the register of members’ interests in order to stick to the Parliament’s rules. My relevant interest is that I am a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute. I started s...
Monica Lennon Lab Chamber
26 Mar 2025
Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Any good practice is always welcome, but what I am hearing from Fergus Ewing today is that he is in alliance with the Tories, who do not want land reform. It is a shame that the member feels that way, too. I will draw my comments to a conclusion. I have missed out a few thing...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
28 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
In our other sessions we have been taking cognisance of the speed of law reform. We have heard from witnesses that some of the problems in the Scots law of third-party rights have been around since at least the second world war, so has the pace of law reform been too slow?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
28 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
We have spoken a lot about the speed of law reform in this area and we heard that some problems with third-party rights in Scots law have been around since the second world war, at least. What are your reflections on that? Is that a fair assessment? Has reform been too slow? I...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
18 Jun 2025
Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Thank you, convener—I have the right paperwork in front of me now. It has been a long day. I will speak to amendments 515 and 516 on Crown rights to the foreshore and the seabed. The devolution of the management of the Crown estate was an important and overdue reform, but tha...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Chamber
20 Dec 2016
Improving the Care Experience for Looked-after Children
The First Minister’s announcement earlier this year that the Government would be launching an independent “root and branch review” of the care system was very good news. Scottish Labour therefore welcomes Mark McDonald’s Scottish Government motion, which we will be supporting ...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
28 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Now that the matter is on the radar and there is a commitment to reform, what, in general terms, are the expectations within the legal profession? We have spoken about limitations and challenges. Ultimately, it is about improving the situation. Are people in the profession opt...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Chamber
28 Jun 2017
Education Governance
I extend Scottish Labour’s congratulations to Tom Mason on his election and on having made his first speech in this important debate. In his opening remarks, Mr Swinney said that he wants a world-class education system. Who would disagree? We have heard today that there is co...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
As another member of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee, it is a pleasure to follow Alison Harris. As you have heard, Presiding Officer, over the past several months, the committee has been the lead committee on the bill. It is fair to say that we have become fairly...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Chamber
20 Nov 2019
Health and Social Care (Investment)
Last week, it was my pleasure to attend the Scottish health awards, which celebrate some of the most inspiring people who work in our precious national health service. I am so grateful for the work that all our NHS staff do and I want to take this opportunity—I hope on behalf ...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Chamber
30 Jan 2020
Drugs and Alcohol
I wish that we did not need to have this debate. Nothing that we can say will heal the hearts of people who are affected by the harms and losses that we are discussing. Every life that is lost to drugs or alcohol is a devastating tragedy. Families have heard politicians expres...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
10 Dec 2024
Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
It has been fascinating to hear you put on the record the benefits and opportunities of crofting and its importance to Scotland. Although we are here to scrutinise the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill, I am aware of media reports this morning, certainly in The Courier and possibly...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Committee
17 Jun 2025
Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Amendment 514 is the only amendment in my name in this group. Common good is the oldest form of community ownership in Scotland, dating back to the 13th century. It is an important part of the heritage of many communities, and those places should have the opportunity to take b...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
17 Jun 2025
Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I am sorry for interrupting you, cabinet secretary. You have made some fair points in relation to amendment 473. However, I have just realised that I did not speak to amendment 474, perhaps in the interest of time. The issue was raised at stage 2 of the previous Land Reform (...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Committee
06 Sep 2016
Interests
Thank you, convener. I draw the committee’s attention to my entry in the register of members’ interests. You will note that I am an elected member of South Lanarkshire Council and a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute.
Monica Lennon Lab Chamber
29 Sep 2016
Early Learning and Childcare Provision
I appreciate that clarification. That will be reassuring to the students who we are talking about. In the past couple of days, a college lecturer from—I think—the north-east of Scotland shared with me the experience of a single mother of three children who had applied for vari...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Committee
27 Sep 2016
Education (Student Loans) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2016 (SSI 2016/261)
As I understand it, these regulations are subject to the negative procedure and are made under powers conferred by the Education (Scotland) Act 1980. It is in your written response to the legal adviser’s questions that the regulations are not a direct response to the court’s j...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
27 Sep 2016
Education (Student Loans) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2016 (SSI 2016/261)
To clarify, was using a convention rights compliance order considered?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
27 Sep 2016
Education (Student Loans) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2016 (SSI 2016/261)
In your first response, you said that it was not necessary. Could you expand on that?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
27 Sep 2016
Education (Student Loans) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2016 (SSI 2016/261)
I want to pick up on one point. We must be able to make a connection to the legitimate aim of the decision maker, in this case the Scottish Government. We have heard a couple of times today that the test is that it delivers student support in a sustainable way. The word “susta...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
27 Sep 2016
Education (Student Loans) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2016 (SSI 2016/261)
Is the test that is applied to gauge whether someone has the ability to pay back the loan based purely on the number of years that they might have in the labour market?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
27 Sep 2016
Education (Student Loans) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2016 (SSI 2016/261)
We heard earlier that no suitable alternatives were identified, or that there were alternatives but they were considered to be unsuitable. What were those alternatives?
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Committee
01 Nov 2016
Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016: Subordinate Legislation
Good morning, minister. You mentioned in your opening statement that you value the feedback that you received from stakeholders during the consultation that took place over the summer. In their written evidence to the committee, both ICAS and R3 argue that setting the statutor...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
01 Nov 2016
Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016: Subordinate Legislation
The committee understands that the Scottish Government would prefer to wait for the results of the review of interest rates in England and Wales before it considers changes here, but why not look at the matter now? Do you know how long the review in England and Wales could tak...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
01 Nov 2016
Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016: Subordinate Legislation
Is there a timescale for that? If it is taking too long in England and Wales, is there a point at which you will think that Scotland cannot wait to learn from its neighbours?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
01 Nov 2016
Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016: Subordinate Legislation
Thank you.
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Committee
10 Jan 2017
Instruments subject to Negative Procedure
I draw the committee’s attention to my entry in the register of members’ interests, as I am a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute.
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
10 Jan 2017
Instruments subject to Negative Procedure
I agree with Stuart McMillan.
Monica Lennon Lab Chamber
12 Jan 2017
Education and Skills Organisations (Performance and Role)
Christina McKelvie needs to reflect on the comment that she made. I have never heard her raise any concerns about the budget pressures that South Lanarkshire Council faces. In fact, we hear from SNP members that councils are receiving fair settlements but what is happening in ...
Monica Lennon Lab Chamber
08 Feb 2017
Portfolio Question Time · Scottish Fiscal Commission
This week, the Fraser of Allander institute raised concerns about the way in which the so-called additional money that was announced in last week’s budget was found in such a short space of time following the publication of the draft budget. The institute also raised some impo...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Chamber
08 Mar 2017
Education
I will take the opportunity to raise an issue that I have raised several times with the Scottish Government: the situation that is faced by our pupils who have additional support needs and by our vital support staff. We know, because parents tell us, that the number of pupils...
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Committee
14 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Good morning. In your answer to the first question, you helpfully set out the rationale for the bill, which is that the current arrangements are not fit for purpose. The policy memorandum indicates that the bill will promote the use of Scots law. You mentioned that your invest...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
14 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Can you explain a bit further why that is a negative consequence? Why are the workarounds and applying English law a negative?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
14 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I just wanted to get a sense of whether people are missing out because of the current limitations and whether there are practical difficulties for the legal profession in terms of being able to apply the law. If Scots law is inadequate and you are having to apply English law, ...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
14 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Sticking with workarounds, are you able to explain in a bit more detail how the collateral warranties will work in practice? Why are the proposals an improvement?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
14 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Does the proposal provide any extra safeguard in the event of people going out of business and so on?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
14 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
On liabilities, can you explain for my benefit what you mean by the “black hole of non-liability” in relation to company groups?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
14 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Watch this space. Are there any other problems that we should be aware of or any practical issues that have come up from your investigation?
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
The policy memorandum states that the bill will promote the greater use of Scots law, but I understand that people will remain free to use English law if they wish or if they prefer. Based on your experience, will the bill promote greater use of Scots law?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I ask Ross Anderson the same question, and also whether he can think of circumstances in which it would be preferable to use English law rather than the bill, if it comes forward.
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Yes, I wanted to identify the circumstances in which people who were trying to access law would use English law instead of Scots law.
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
You mentioned workarounds, particularly in the context of people who can perhaps afford more sophisticated advice. Will there continue to be a reliance on workarounds, or is it realistic to think that we will see a shift away from that?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
It sounds as if you agree with the Scottish Law Commission that third-party rights are preferable to collateral warranties. Can you explain the problems with collateral warranties? Is it the cost?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Thank you. We have talked a bit about the practical problems with the current law. The witnesses heard me ask the previous panel about the proposition in the policy memorandum that “The Bill will promote the use of Scots law”. You all seem on board with that; there seems to ...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
How do you encourage people to behave in that way and go in the direction that you have set out?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Perhaps I can open the discussion up to the rest of the panel.
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I will pick up on that point. If the position is very established and people are very much wedded to collateral warranties in the construction sector, will it be difficult to get clients to move from that?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I do not want to put words in anyone’s mouth, but is it your view that, broadly speaking, legal practitioners will make use of the legislation and that, over time, there will be a reduced reliance on workarounds?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
What could be done to speed things up if the bill is enacted? Will it be down to you to be strong advocates for it?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
That is helpful. I return to a point that we raised last week with the Scottish Law Commission, and which the convener raised earlier—about the “black hole of non-liability”, which sounds rather scary. The Scottish Law Commission indicated that the bill would make it easier f...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
While I have you all here, I have a final question. In looking at this piece of work, I think that one of the challenges is that it is difficult to quantify the extent to which all that we have spoken about is a problem and who it affects. However, given that we have here peop...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Thank you.
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Good morning, Professor Beale. I am interested in what you have said so far. The Scottish Law Commission’s report indicates that there have been few cases on the 1999 act and that there has been a lot of academic criticism of the act. Will you expand on the reasons for the lac...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
It is useful to get that clarity. In last week’s meeting, which you might have listened to or read about in our Official Report, the Scottish Law Commission indicated that use of the 1999 act has increased only slowly. Do you agree?
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
We raised with the two previous panels the point that the policy memorandum expresses hope that there will be a shift to using Scots law. We have heard from a number of legal practitioners today. Are you confident that such a shift will happen in time or do you think that ther...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
21 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
That is helpful. Thank you.
Monica Lennon (Central Scotland) (Lab) Lab Committee
28 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Good morning. Unlike the convener, I do not have any specialist knowledge of agriculture or fertiliser. Nevertheless, I will ask my question. In previous evidence sessions, the committee has heard that in many sectors—including construction, for example—legal workarounds seem...
Monica Lennon Lab Committee
28 Mar 2017
Contract (Third Party Rights) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
That is helpful—it is a clear answer. In previous evidence sessions, we have heard that, in areas such as the construction sector, where collateral warranties are quite commonly used, clients and practitioners might be quite wedded to that approach, and we wondered to what ext...
← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 26 March 2025

26 Mar 2025 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Some people hold the view that it does not matter who owns Scotland’s land. They do not mind that Scotland’s pattern of private land ownership is probably the most concentrated in the world. Some people are relaxed that anyone in the world can buy large amounts of land in Scotland with relatively little scrutiny. Scottish Labour members believe that those things do matter. It matters that less than 1 per cent of Scotland’s people own two thirds of Scotland’s rural land.

The story of who owns Scotland is a long history of inequality, and we need to write a new chapter. The bill is the latest attempt to spread the ownership of Scotland’s land into the hands of the many, not the wealthy few. Scottish Labour absolutely supports the bill’s principles, because we know that the land reform journey is far from over.

We have not waited for the Government to do all the work. My colleague Mercedes Villalba consulted on a member’s bill a couple of summers ago, and I hope that the Government is very much looking at that work as we try to improve the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill.

Rural communities deserve the opportunities that can be unlocked if land is owned, managed and used in the public interest. Our ambition is for urban communities to also benefit. As a Central Scotland MSP, I know that there is an overreliance on speculative private developers, which contributes to the acquisition of strategic land banks. We have heard about the community right to buy, but we need that to be more meaningful and to be a reality.

We know that wealthy landowners are powerful and have huge influence over decisions that impact the people of Scotland. A Scotland that aspires to be modern and democratic needs to change that. Tim Eagle spoke about large estate owners gifting small plots of land to local people to build homes on, but our communities deserve to have greater control over their own destiny. They deserve choice, not charity.

As a member of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee, I am in the privileged position of being one of the seven committee MSPs who have been scrutinising the bill. We have read and listened to a colossal amount of evidence. Like the convener, I am hugely grateful to everyone who has contributed, and a special word of thanks must be recorded for the committee clerks and SPICe colleagues.

I recognise that the cabinet secretary and her officials have worked really hard to reach this stage. Mairi Gougeon has signalled her intention to leave the Parliament at the end of this session, and there will be opportunities to say nice things about her closer to that time.

Despite all the doom and gloom that we have heard from members of the Tory front bench today, there is a majority in the Parliament for advancing Scotland’s land reform journey.

The committee’s stage 1 report recommends support for the bill’s general principles. However, we make really important recommendations on how the bill should be improved and strengthened, and we set out where more clarity is required. I welcome the cabinet secretary’s letter to the committee last night and the fact that she has restated today that she will continue to listen, reflect and work with MSPs, stakeholders and, importantly, grass-roots voices, because we must ensure that the bill is amended at stage 2 in a coherent way.

I agree with the cabinet secretary that Scotland should be a land of opportunity, and we need to be bold to ensure that Scotland is not just a playground for the extremely wealthy. I think that some members in the chamber would gladly keep things that way, so we need to work hard and be bold and ambitious at stages 2 and 3.

My colleague Rhoda Grant, who attended stage 1 evidence sessions and has championed land reform throughout her political service, has set out areas in which Scottish Labour will seek to improve the bill. That includes public interest tests—I was glad to hear Michael Matheson speak about them, because the Government needs to show a bit of courage and be bolder in that area.

Rhoda Grant talked about issues on which Scottish Labour will lodge amendments or support others, particularly in relation to thresholds, lotting and the role of the land and communities commissioner. We believe that the commissioner should be able to proactively investigate potential breaches of community engagement obligations.

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-16892, in the name of Mairi Gougeon, on the Land Reform (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. 15:20
The Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands (Mairi Gougeon) SNP
I think that today is a good day. Spring is upon us, and it is a time of renewed hope and optimism. It is on that note that I am proud to open today’s debate...
Douglas Lumsden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
The majority of people who gave evidence to the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee were of the opinion that the bill would not realise the aims that ha...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Always speak through the chair.
Mairi Gougeon SNP
I thank Douglas Lumsden for raising that point. I listened very carefully to the evidence that the committee received and to those concerns. There was broad ...
Douglas Lumsden Con
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Rachael Hamilton (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con) Con
Will the cabinet secretary give way?
Mairi Gougeon SNP
I will give way to Rachael Hamilton, as I have already taken an intervention from Douglas Lumsden.
Rachael Hamilton Con
Does the cabinet secretary believe that there could be a conflict of interest, given that Scottish ministers have to be answerable to decisions made on land ...
Mairi Gougeon SNP
The member raises an important point. I recognise that the Scottish Government is a significant landowner in Scotland, but I do not believe that there is suc...
Mercedes Villalba (North East Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Does the cabinet secretary recognise that, provided that their bank balance is big enough, there is currently nothing to stop someone from buying up all of S...
Mairi Gougeon SNP
I thank Mercedes Villalba for raising that point. There are all sorts of issues in relation to that, but I believe that our proposals, which the committee ha...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (SNP) SNP
Will the cabinet secretary take an intervention?
Mairi Gougeon SNP
I am sorry, but I have to make progress. We have to recognise that reform must be carried out in a way that is fair to all parties, is supported by evidence...
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
I call Edward Mountain to speak on behalf of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee. 15:31
Edward Mountain (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I am pleased to speak in this debate on behalf of the Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee. In accordance with parliamentary rules, I will make a full d...
Mercedes Villalba Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Edward Mountain Con
I will if I have time, Presiding Officer.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
There is time, but it is very limited.
Mercedes Villalba Lab
Is it fair to say that those who opposed part 1 tended to be representatives of those who own large amounts of land in Scotland?
Edward Mountain Con
That is not entirely true. Some of the people who opposed part 1 were people who manage land holdings across Scotland, whether in the private or public secto...
Fergus Ewing SNP
Will Edward Mountain give way briefly?
Edward Mountain Con
I think that I am short of time, but I would like to give way.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
There is a limited bit of time in hand.
Fergus Ewing SNP
The bill proposes legal measures that would, I gather, be applied retrospectively. Is the committee at all concerned that that might contravene the European ...
Edward Mountain Con
I think that the committee was more concerned that constantly changing agricultural tenancies retrospectively could cause problems for the letting of land in...
Tim Eagle (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I remind members of my entry in the register of members’ interests, which states that I am a small farmer. I also have a couple of short limited duration ten...
Mairi Gougeon SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Tim Eagle Con
Go for it.
The Deputy Presiding Officer SNP
Although it was not lacking in courtesy, I note that that language was a bit relaxed.