Chamber
Meeting of the Parliament 05 December 2012
05 Dec 2012 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Policing
The cabinet secretary will remember that I first went to see him in December last year; John Finnie invited me to do so and Christine Grahame encouraged me. I wanted to speak to him about two pressing issues. The first was the governance arrangements for the SPS and an absolute need for clarity on operational independence. The second was the absence of democratic oversight on the part of the Parliament at a key time of police reform.
This morning, the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents contacted me to reinforce its concern about operational independence. The incoming chief constable is already on record on that matter and there is a difference of view with his chair. Her Majesty’s inspector of constabulary has also commented.
In July 2012, the police reform team prepared a blueprint, agreed with civil servants, that showed the directors of finance and HR alongside the heads of public information and corporate services, reporting via the chief constable to the board. They were all answerable to the chief constable.
In the absence of any statement from the cabinet secretary, it soon became evident that the incoming chair of the SPA had different views. At his first appearance before the Justice Committee on 23 October, Mr Emery was less than candid about his approach to questions of governance and structure, yet days later at his induction meeting for the SPA on 29 October he was able to say:
“We have a very wide ranging set of responsibilities in the running of policing ... I am a businessman and I see policing through that lens ... I equate the Chief Constable to a Chief Operations Officer ... The vision does not have a final form. It is the SPA that will develop that clarity”.
As a result of various approaches from ASPS, which included support from the Scottish Police Federation, and approaches from across the police service, I lodged a motion on 5 November entitled “Concerns about Threat to Operational Independence of Single Police Force”. Questions asked of both the cabinet secretary and the First Minister produced a lack of clarity on future operational independence.
Much has been made of a creative friction, almost in a light-hearted way, but policing provides the bedrock upon which many communities build. Arrangements for the tone, direction and—yes—vision for policing have an impact on that bedrock.
This morning, the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents contacted me to reinforce its concern about operational independence. The incoming chief constable is already on record on that matter and there is a difference of view with his chair. Her Majesty’s inspector of constabulary has also commented.
In July 2012, the police reform team prepared a blueprint, agreed with civil servants, that showed the directors of finance and HR alongside the heads of public information and corporate services, reporting via the chief constable to the board. They were all answerable to the chief constable.
In the absence of any statement from the cabinet secretary, it soon became evident that the incoming chair of the SPA had different views. At his first appearance before the Justice Committee on 23 October, Mr Emery was less than candid about his approach to questions of governance and structure, yet days later at his induction meeting for the SPA on 29 October he was able to say:
“We have a very wide ranging set of responsibilities in the running of policing ... I am a businessman and I see policing through that lens ... I equate the Chief Constable to a Chief Operations Officer ... The vision does not have a final form. It is the SPA that will develop that clarity”.
As a result of various approaches from ASPS, which included support from the Scottish Police Federation, and approaches from across the police service, I lodged a motion on 5 November entitled “Concerns about Threat to Operational Independence of Single Police Force”. Questions asked of both the cabinet secretary and the First Minister produced a lack of clarity on future operational independence.
Much has been made of a creative friction, almost in a light-hearted way, but policing provides the bedrock upon which many communities build. Arrangements for the tone, direction and—yes—vision for policing have an impact on that bedrock.
In the same item of business
The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick)
NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-05087, in the name of Lewis Macdonald, on policing in Scotland.14:40
Lewis Macdonald (North East Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
When the Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Bill went through the Parliament earlier this year, Labour and other parties raised a series of concerns about the...
Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (SNP)
SNP
This is not breaking news, but the committee has agreed that those opinions would be treated as private. There is a letter to that effect to Vic Emery and th...
Lewis Macdonald
Lab
I understand that, and it is clear that the committee is free to determine what to do with that information on the basis of the advice that it has received. ...
The Presiding Officer
NPA
I call Kenny MacAskill to speak to and move amendment S4M-05087.1. Mr MacAskill, you have seven minutes. 14:49
The Cabinet Secretary for Justice (Kenny MacAskill)
SNP
Thank you, Presiding Officer. I welcome the opportunity to respond to the Labour Party motion and Lewis Macdonald’s opening speech. This debate comes just a ...
Jenny Marra (North East Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
Does the cabinet secretary accept that police staff numbers have fallen by more than 900 since March 2010 and that the increase of 65 is only over the past f...
Kenny MacAskill
SNP
I get asked such questions regularly by Labour Party members—sometimes by Ms Marra and sometimes by others. I have given a snapshot that shows that at the pr...
Lewis Macdonald
Lab
The cabinet secretary talks of predictions, so will he now give us a prediction and say whether he anticipates that trend of increasing staff numbers to cont...
Kenny MacAskill
SNP
What we have said—
The Presiding Officer
NPA
Cabinet secretary, I remind you that you have seven minutes and no longer.
Kenny MacAskill
SNP
I will move on then, Presiding Officer.We have made our position clear that officers and staff are performing excellently together. Crime is at a 37-year low...
Margo MacDonald (Lothian) (Ind)
Ind
I thank the cabinet secretary for giving way, given the shortness of time for his speech. Before he moves on to talk about staffing, I want to ask him about ...
Kenny MacAskill
SNP
Those will be operational matters on which Ms MacDonald will no doubt engage with Mr House or one of his deputes. I have no doubt that they will be happy to ...
John Lamont (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
Con
I welcome the opportunity to speak about policing in Scotland and I commend the Scottish Labour Party for using its debating time to focus on this important ...
Kenny MacAskill
SNP
Does the member accept that it has been made quite clear that the issue is not who controls, because it has been accepted that the line of accountability is ...
John Lamont
Con
The cabinet secretary has perhaps articulated more clearly than was expected the difficulties that will arise when the job cuts come. We should be under no i...
Jenny Marra
Lab
Does the member agree that the points of contention on HR and finance that the cabinet secretary outlined today are the same points of contention that the Ju...
John Lamont
Con
I entirely agree with what the member says.There are two points that will not make things easy for the single police force. First, we still do not have a ful...
Sandra White (Glasgow Kelvin) (SNP)
SNP
I, too, welcome today’s debate on policing in Scotland. As the cabinet secretary has pointed out in both his speech and the Government’s amendment, it comes ...
Lewis Macdonald
Lab
I acknowledge that many areas appear to have been resolved, but will Sandra White confirm that she said in committee that she did not accept the argument tha...
Sandra White
SNP
The issue might be the language that has been used by some, such as “dispute”. We needed clarification, but I believe that the cabinet secretary has clarifie...
Graeme Pearson (South Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
The cabinet secretary will remember that I first went to see him in December last year; John Finnie invited me to do so and Christine Grahame encouraged me. ...
Margo MacDonald
Ind
Can Graeme Pearson tell me what the clear notion in the legislation is on who fires and who hires? We have had mad and bad in that position before.
Graeme Pearson
Lab
Margo MacDonald makes a good point, which I will come to at the end of my speech.On 27 November, the Justice Committee brought back the chief constable and t...
Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (SNP)
SNP
I will deal briefly with three issues: first, the job losses or backfilling; secondly, the relationship between Emery and House—they could be a good double a...
Jenny Marra
Lab
Will the member give way?
Christine Grahame
SNP
I am sorry, but I do not have time. This is a short debate.The fact is that the single police force in Scotland is envied in England and Wales—members should...
Alison McInnes (North East Scotland) (LD)
LD
I thank the Labour Party for bringing the debate to the Parliament this afternoon. The police reforms are at a crucial stage and it is right that we seek to ...
Colin Keir (Edinburgh Western) (SNP)
SNP
I have read the Labour Party motion and I have just a hint of a feeling that it is a wee bit premature.I asked the new chief constable and the chair of the S...