Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,354,908
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 60 of 2,354,908 contributions. Latest 30 days: 0. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 25 Mar 2026.
Graham Simpson Reform Chamber
24 Feb 2026
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 3
The point of Mr Whitfield’s intervention is very important. I have considered the issue and I am confident that the bill is sound—or it will be if we pass these amendments.Amendment 56 reflects that the provision in section 22 should apply to the whole act, as opposed to only ...
Graham Simpson Reform Chamber
13 Nov 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I am afraid not, Mr Cole-Hamilton—perhaps I will be able to give way during my closing speech. It could be that that element of the bill will be removed during stage 2, which would be a shame. I will support Kevin Stewart’s interesting amendment. I do not see it as a wreckin...
Graham Simpson Reform Chamber
24 Feb 2026
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 3
Sue Webber’s amendments all broadly relate to where the line should be drawn in terms of when a member commits something sufficiently serious that it warrants automatic removal from Parliament altogether.I gave careful consideration in developing the bill to what the appropria...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con Chamber
17 May 2017
Housing Support for Young People
It is strange that we have debates on welfare in this Parliament that regard changes to the welfare system as bolts from the blue that are last-minute, nasty Tory broadsides designed to catch out the needy. Interruption. I thought that some members would like that one. That i...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
11 Sep 2019
Non-Domestic Rates (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Let us go back to the charity angle, on which we have had written and oral evidence from the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator. In its submission, it said that “Removal of charitable relief from non-domestic rates from the majority of independent schools has potential ...
Graham Simpson Con Chamber
10 Oct 2019
Non-Domestic Rates (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Dear me, dear me. We will have to see the entire budget to answer that question, and we will have to see what the Government is doing to councils and whether it will slash their budgets again. There is another missed opportunity to do something about high streets, which is s...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con Chamber
11 Jan 2023
National Planning Framework 4
It is an absolute pleasure to take part in the debate today. The very fact we are having the debate is down to amendments for which I was responsible and which were voted through during the passage of the Planning (Scotland) Bill in the previous parliamentary session. Members ...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
27 May 2025
Housing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Monitoring is key. The questions are, who does the monitoring, and then, who does the enforcement? The reality at the moment, is that, if you are a tenant and you are told by the landlord, “I intend to sell; therefore, you need to go”, chances are that the tenant will just go ...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
19 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
It would be very difficult to set out in the bill a list of offences that would lead to the removal of a member, which is why I have gone for an actual term. The background to that is the case of Bill Walker, a former MSP and the only MSP whom I will name during this meeting. ...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
19 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
The bill does define it. Section 26(2) states: “due to the person’s failure to physically attend proceedings as a member, the Parliament has resolved to disqualify the person in accordance with standing orders made by virtue of section 27 of the Scottish Parliament (Recall an...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con Committee
19 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
Thank you, convener. I have very much enjoyed the committee’s previous meetings on the bill. The range of questions—I am sure that I will get the same—has been very good and they have covered all aspects of the bill. I am not assuming that we will get to stage 2, but, should ...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Reform) Reform Chamber
13 Nov 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
It has taken a long time to reach today’s stage 1 debate on the Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill. I first suggested that we should do something in this area in the previous session of Parliament, following a number of conversations with my then party le...
Graham Simpson Reform Chamber
13 Nov 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I am always happy to speak to Mr Gibson and to take up his offer of help. What he otherwise suggests is not something that I agree with. I think that it is outwith the scope of the bill, but no doubt that will be tested at stage 2. I am suggesting that a yes/no poll would be...
Graham Simpson Reform Chamber
24 Feb 2026
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 3
In this group, Sue Webber has reintroduced the idea that MSPs should be required to attend proceedings in the Parliament at least once every six months unless they have good reason not to. That approach was what first started me on this journey. However, that provision was rem...
Graham Simpson Reform Chamber
24 Feb 2026
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 3
Most of these minor and technical amendments are mine; some are from the minister. I will go through each in turn.A number of the amendments restructure the bill, including to reflect the deletion of part 2 at stage 2. Amendments 47 and 49 reflect that part 2, on removal, was ...
Graham Simpson Reform Chamber
24 Feb 2026
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 3
I will not, if Mr Whittle does not mind. I am almost done.In addition, if a person was found guilty of a sufficiently serious offence, it is likely that they would receive a lengthy prison sentence that would certainly be over 12 months. That means that they would automaticall...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Reform) Reform Chamber
24 Feb 2026
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 3
Sue Webber’s amendments would apply the recall petition process only to constituency members and provide for automatic removal of regional members in cases in which the parliamentary sanction grounds apply.There are two questions for Parliament to consider in relation to this ...
Graham Simpson Reform Committee
29 Jan 2026
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 2
I will just quickly say that I support amendment 76.Amendment 76 agreed to.Section 21, as amended, agreed to.After section 21Amendment 77 moved—Graeme Dey—and agreed to.Section 22 agreed to.Section 23—Meaning of expressions relevant to the criminal-offence groundAmendment 78 m...
The Convener Con Committee
20 Feb 2018
Instruments subject to Affirmative Procedure
Agenda item 3 is consideration of instruments subject to affirmative procedure. Section 1 of the Equality Act 2010 applies to Scotland, England and Wales, although it has been commenced only in relation to Scotland. Subsection 3 contains a list of authorities that are subject ...
Graham Simpson Con Chamber
09 Oct 2019
Transport (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
Amendments 157 to 159 are in my name, but I lodged them on behalf of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. As members know, one of the committee’s primary functions is to ensure that delegated powers in bills are appropriate. Like the rest of the Parliament, we want t...
Graham Simpson Con Chamber
05 Mar 2020
Budget (Scotland) (No 4) Bill: Stage 3
We have never argued that the council tax should be scrapped. My point is that the level of council tax increases, year after year, is hitting people in the pocket. There are lots of reasons for council tax poverty, but it cannot have helped that council tax bills have rockete...
Graham Simpson Con Chamber
25 Jun 2020
Portfolio Question Time · “High Rise Inventory 2020—Summary Report”
I am sure that the minister will be aware of the session that we had last week at the Local Government and Communities Committee, which looked at this issue. There were some calls for the inventory to be made public. Will the minister comment on that? There were also calls for...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con Chamber
12 Mar 2024
Housing (Cladding Remediation) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Let us start at the beginning. Other members have rightly said that the whole issue began when Grenfell tower turned into an inferno in June 2017, killing 72 people. It was a scandalous mass tragedy that could have been avoided had inflammable cladding not been on the building...
Graham Simpson Con Chamber
28 Mar 2024
Public Transport (Fair Fares Review)
Smashing. I don’t have any time in hand. Laughter. I was keen to work with the Government on developing costings for such a scheme, and I still am. If the Government thinks that people with substance issues should get free bus travel—which is an idea that we can look at—what...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con Chamber
06 Jun 2024
Rail Fares
I congratulate Mark Ruskell on securing the debate. I was very happy to sign his motion, because I agree with every word of it. The removal of peak fares on our trains has been a positive thing. I would like it to be permanent because, for a long time, my view has been that w...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con Committee
08 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
If I vote in a normal general election or council election, I am told where I have to vote, and it is one place. If we have a recall petition in Scotland, should that be the same? This is the opposite question to the one that the convener asked, but should the elector be restr...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
08 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
Do you accept that, if we are to have a recall process, it needs to apply to constituency members and to regional members? The new thing in that regard is regional members, and I have obviously had to wrestle with that question. If you accept that we need to have something tha...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
08 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I will point out to Mr Burr that I appeared before the equivalent committee of the Senedd and we addressed and discussed this issue. Next year, Wales is moving to a system that is based entirely on lists, which is awful. I think that it is a terrible system, but we are stuck w...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
08 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I have only one. Emma Roddick has explored a really interesting area, which I am keen to consider further. Sarah, is it your understanding that, under the Westminster legislation, which I am largely mirroring, if voters say in the initial vote that the member should be recalle...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
08 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
That would be the same here, which plays into Emma Roddick’s very good questions about the power of the parties. I will reflect and come back to the committee on that.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
08 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
Yes, I have a couple of questions. Do you think that this committee is the right way to go in dealing with these issues?
Graham Simpson Con Committee
08 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
Okay. You have been looking at my proposals, but have you also had a chance to look at how councils handle these issues? The spark that made me come up with my proposals was that councillors can be removed if they do not attend without good reason for six months. That has happ...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con Committee
22 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
On that point, do you think that, if this is the committee that deals with such issues, it should have lay members, as is the case at Westminster and, I think, in Wales?
Graham Simpson Con Committee
22 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
Convener, it has been a superb session. The questions have been great; we have covered a lot of ground, and I have been fascinated to hear the views of the academics. I have just been reflecting on all of this, so if you do not mind, convener, I will give a small anecdote.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
22 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I have been working on this for a long time now. At the start of the process, I attempted to reach out to Arnold Schwarzenegger through his office.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
22 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
Unfortunately he was not—I could not get him to contribute. I think that there were issues at that time with the recall process in California, so Arnie was keeping schtum. Convener, if I may, I just want to ask Nick McKerrell and Alistair Clark a question about non-attendance...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
22 May 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I have a reflection. If members have not done so already, I encourage them to read the bill’s policy memorandum, which covers quite a lot of the ground and shows that I have given deep thought to some of the questions that have been raised. I know that I will be questioned in...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
Thank you very much for your welcome, convener. It is good to be back as it has been a while since I have been here. As you know, I enjoyed being convener of the committee and found it to be one of the most valuable parliamentary committees. I am not saying that to butter you ...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
I hope that that was useful, but, in essence, the question is whether it is appropriate for the Government to confer powers on somebody else to make legislation. Frankly, I think that this is an example of the committee doing its job, which is what I want. I want the committe...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
Thank you for the question, but what I have just read out perhaps supersedes it. We ought to reconsider that issue at stage 2. I am more than happy to work with the committee if it wants to be involved in that, because I want the bill to proceed, but I want to get it right. I...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
The Electoral Commission’s position is clear: it does not want to draft subordinate legislation, but it would like to be consulted on it. I am quite happy to respect that it is the Government’s job to draft the legislation. You would expect that to be the commission’s position.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
Yes.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
I am not aware of any.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
Mr Kidd, the power that you are talking about relates to the recall element of the bill and not to the non-attendance element of the bill.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
Non-attendance is entirely separate, and I presume that the committee is content with that. The power relates only to the recall element.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
My preference is that we leave it to subordinate legislation, possibly after a period of consultation by the Government.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
It is always my preference to have powers set out in a bill, but sometimes that cannot be done. You have to trust ministers to do their job sometimes, Ms Clark—even I do that. Laughter. However, my preference in this instance—it will not surprise you to hear this—is that, if w...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
Yes.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
I think that I have answered it.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
It is a radical idea, convener. The answer is no, I had not considered it. If I was to think it through, I think that it would open up a hornet’s nest that we might not want to open. I imagine that the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities would have a pretty strong view we...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
It would be out of scope, because the bill relates only to MSPs. It is an interesting idea, convener, but it is one that I would not agree with.
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
The convener was asking whether I considered extending the power of recall to cover local councillors. One element of the bill relates to the matter that you have just raised, Mr Balfour. The idea that I started with was the question about non-attendance. As you rightly point ...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
03 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill
Good.
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Con) Con Committee
12 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I thank the committee, as I always have done, for the breadth and detail of members’ questions. It has been an excellent session. I thank the minister for the way that he has worked with me so far, and I think that that will continue. I press the minister on the recall quest...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
12 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
Generally, are there any red flags in the bill?
Graham Simpson Con Committee
12 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I put on record that we have discussed that, and I agree with the point that you have made. Let me pose it as a question, so that I am not making a point: do you agree that the issue could be explored at stage 2, should the bill reach that point?
Graham Simpson Con Committee
12 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
Finally—and I am not getting ahead of myself—I put it on record that I have been in constant discussion with the Electoral Commission, which has already suggested a number of amendments. I will pose it as a question again: if the bill progresses, do you see it as an opportunit...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
19 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I think that the subjective bit that you might be referring to is the non-attendance part and the reasonable excuses for not coming—Rona Mackay has been exploring those questions. I was very clear when I was considering that provision that I would not target people who just do...
Graham Simpson Con Committee
19 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I see what you mean. Focusing on recall, I have tried to come up with a fair and proportionate system. I am racking my brains to think which bit you are referring to that would—
Graham Simpson Con Committee
19 Jun 2025
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1
I suppose that it is about all of those, but, ultimately, the first stage is an MSP not performing properly or breaking the rules. The misconduct would come first, otherwise none of this applies. If people behave as they should, none of this applies. Ultimately, if the bill go...
← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 24 February 2026 [Draft]

24 Feb 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 3
Simpson, Graham Reform Central Scotland Watch on SPTV

The point of Mr Whitfield’s intervention is very important. I have considered the issue and I am confident that the bill is sound—or it will be if we pass these amendments.

Amendment 56 reflects that the provision in section 22 should apply to the whole act, as opposed to only the part that it originally applied to prior to amendment at stage 2. It reflects part 2 having been deleted from the bill at stage 2. Similarly, amendment 58 amends section 23, on the meaning of expressions relevant to the criminal offence ground, so that it applies to the act as a whole and not a particular part.

Amendment 59 is another restructuring amendment. It moves the interpretation provisions in section 23, which are relevant to the criminal offence ground, into the “Final provisions” part of the bill. Similarly, amendment 63 moves the general interpretive provisions in section 24 to the “Final provisions” part. That is so that both sets provisions can come into force after royal assent and not be subject to regulations that would bring those provisions into force at a later date.

Amendments 60 and 62 reflect that bill was amended to remove the original part 2, on the removal of members, and that it now concerns only the recall of MSPs. The reference to the word “Part”, which is removed by both these amendments, clarifies that the general interpretive rules under section 24 will now apply to the act as a whole, as opposed to applying only to part 1, on recall, as they did originally.

Amendments 31, 36 and 37 amend the short title of the bill to remove reference to “removal”, to reflect that the part of the bill concerning removal of members was deleted at stage 2.

I move amendment 47.

In the same item of business

14:38
The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is stage 3 proceedings on the Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill. In dealing with the amendments, members sho...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Group 1 is on how a regional member is recalled. Amendment 38, in the name of Sue Webber, is grouped with amendments 38 to 42, 42A, 42B, 42C, 43 to 46, 48, 5...
Sue Webber (Lothian) (Con) Con
All the amendments in this group have been lodged by me and concern changes to the recall process for regional members. One of the key challenges of the bill...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind) Ind
Will the member give way?
Sue Webber Con
No, I shall not be giving way to Mr Mason.
Jeremy Balfour (Lothian) (Ind) Ind
Will the member give way?
Sue Webber Con
Yes, I will give way to Jeremy Balfour.
Jeremy Balfour Ind
My concern is that the amendments would take away the responsibility and power from the electorate and would allow the Parliament to make a decision that the...
Sue Webber Con
Indeed. Such vexatious complaints and what might or might not happen in a future session of Parliament are of grave concern to me. We must be mindful that th...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I thank Sue Webber for her explanation of her amendments. I wish to speak to amendment 42. The member obviously received different advice from that which I r...
The Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans (Graeme Dey) SNP
The Scottish Government cannot support any of Sue Webber’s amendments in the group, because they would change the nature of recall by removing Scottish voter...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Reform) Reform
Sue Webber’s amendments would apply the recall petition process only to constituency members and provide for automatic removal of regional members in cases i...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call Sue Webber to wind up the debate and to press or withdraw amendment 38.
Sue Webber Con
I find it slightly ironic that two regional MSPs are supporting my amendments but the Government minister who was elected in a constituency is not. I push ba...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The question is, that amendment 38 be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
There will be a division. As this will be the first division of stage 3, I suspend the meeting for about five minutes to allow members to access the digital ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
We will proceed with the division on amendment 38. Members should cast their votes now.The vote is closed.
The Cabinet Secretary for Climate Action and Energy (Gillian Martin) SNP
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I could not connect to the app. I would have voted no.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
Thank you, Ms Martin. Your vote will be recorded.15:00
Sharon Dowey (South Scotland) (Con) Con
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I would have voted yes.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
Thank you, Ms Dowey. We hope you will have your camera on next time.
ForBaker, Claire (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab)Boyack, Sarah (Lothian) (Lab)Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)Burnett, Alexander (Aberdeenshire West) (Con)Carlaw, ...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
The result of the division is: For 37, Against 69, Abstentions 0.Amendment 38 disagreed to.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
We now turn to group 2, on removal for offending. Amendment 1, in the name of Sue Webber, is grouped with amendments 2 to 6, 8, 9, 22, 25, 27 and 32 to 34. I...
Sue Webber Con
The sound was all over the place there, Presiding Officer. It was coming in and out, and I did not quite hear everything. Perhaps whoever is working the soun...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
If you resume your seat, Ms Webber, I will repeat what I said, and we will see if we can get it all on the record.
Sue Webber Con
Thank you.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Annabelle Ewing) SNP
Amendment 1, in the name of Sue Webber, is grouped with amendments 2 to 6, 8, 9, 22, 25, 27 and 32 to 34. I take this opportunity to point out that, if amend...
Sue Webber Con
That was much clearer—thank you so much, Presiding Officer.Once again, all the amendments in the group have been lodged by me. As I laid out at stage 2, we s...