Committee
Subordinate Legislation Committee 20 November 2012
20 Nov 2012 · S4 · Subordinate Legislation Committee
Item of business
Instruments subject to Negative Procedure
Justice of the Peace Court Fees (Scotland) Order 2012 (SSI 2012/292)
Members will see from the correspondence that two issues were raised with the Scottish Government. The first issue relates to the clarity of the drafting that specifies which civil partnerships are to be recognised as falling within the definition of a partner in article 3(2) of the order and therefore being entitled to certain exemptions from the liability to pay fees. The Scottish Government did not take a consistent approach to defining civil partnerships in relation to the various jurisdictions in the United Kingdom, which might confuse readers.The legal advisers agree with the Scottish Government that the legal effect is sufficiently clear but, given the drafting errors that have been identified in the other fees instruments this week, members may wish to comment on the resulting untidiness of the inconsistent drafting approach—although members might also feel that they have said enough.More significantly, the second issue concerns whether ministers have the power to revoke the District Court Fees Order 1984 (SI 1984/251), as article 4 of the 2012 order sets out to do. Members will have seen the discussion in the legal brief. In short, the legal advisers disagree with the Scottish Government’s view that a power to revoke previous instruments must reasonably be implied, given that the Interpretation Act 1978 clearly states that such a power is not available.The question whether an instrument is within vires is obviously serious. However, the legal advisers accept the Scottish Government’s assessment of the 2012 order’s practical effect. It is agreed that the 1984 order is superseded by the 2012 order and so no longer has legal effect, although not by virtue of the purported exercise of the power in article 4 of the 2012 order. It is also agreed that the situation has no effect on the ability to charge new fees.It is important to register the difference in legal views on the matter of vires. However, if it is accepted that there is no practical effect on the new fee regime’s operation, the legal advisers suggest that members may be content not to report the order formally. Is that agreed?Members indicated agreement.