Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,354,908
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 48 of 2,354,908 contributions. Latest 30 days: 0. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 25 Mar 2026.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
13 Sep 2005
Equality Bill
Clause 11(4) states that, in carrying out its duties,"the Commission shall have particular regard to the importance of exercising the powers … in relation to communities defined by reference to race, religion or belief."During early consultations on the establishment of the ne...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
07 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
We should consider the gender imbalance in pensions. It is ludicrous that the Government gets away with giving only 50 per cent to females. Another basic inequality is that if a single person goes into a residential home, their home is sold to pay for that, whereas if someone ...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
07 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Also, the racial imbalance in this Parliament is a joke.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
07 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
No ethnic minorities are represented in the whole Parliament.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
I will be brief, and I am sorry to take up the committee's time. I will read out this paper as quickly as I can. It is for consideration by the Equal Opportunities Committee, with regard to the proposed schedule.I would like to take issue with the basic fact that the most impo...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Wait until I have finished.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
It is very relevant.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
It is very relevant.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
What I am saying is very relevant.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Yes.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Yes.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
So you are not interested in poverty.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Okay.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Okay, I will be resigning from your committee if you are not prepared to listen to the argument that I am making. I will resign—
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
I would like to move formally that poverty should in the future be an integral part of this committee's remit.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
We should alter this committee's remit if we are not happy—
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
How can you have equality when you have got poverty that you are condoning?
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Well, I was—
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
I was going to say that poverty should be a key consideration in the development of this committee's legacy paper to be passed on to the next committee.This is an excellent committee; it has been a pleasure working on it. But, at the same time, there are issues—
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
You will be doing it without my assistance. I have more things to do with my time. This morning we had an excellent conversation and discussion, but this committee is becoming a talking shop. We have to highlight the genuine problems in Scotland that Parliament can attack.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
It was brilliant.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Yes.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
By the same token, a disabled person in poverty's chances of rising above that to the level that we were discussing earlier are negligible. We should address that.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
We will not be trying to change it unless we talk about it.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
The committee has been doing great work.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
I am not asking you to give up any strand of equality that the committee is pursuing; I am asking only that you to add another strand—the most important strand—which is the poverty that brings about and exacerbates many of the issues that have been discussed.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
If we are not happy with the situation, surely we can challenge it and change it.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
I compliment you on doing that; that is marvellous.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Do not get me wrong—the committee is doing great work and is to be complimented on it. No one can decry the outstanding work that it has done. I am asking only that the committee add another strand to the six strands of inequalities—not to discuss it now, but rather to leave i...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
If this powerful committee highlighted problems with poverty in Scotland today, someone somewhere would be bound to sit up and take notice. We are skirting around the edges instead of going to the heart of the problem, which is that people are living in poverty. Children are i...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
So why not make poverty an additional strand so that there are seven strands?
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Cannot we do so because Canon Kenyon Wright did not agree to do so prior to 1999? Come on.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
I am sorry, but if poverty is not concentrated on to the same extent as the other six strands are concentrated on, I am afraid that you will lose me and I will find another committee.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
21 Feb 2006
Equalities Review
Okay. Thank you.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
06 Jun 2006
Disability Inquiry
The committee has heard that teaching citizenship in schools offers a way of combating negative attitudes. What plans do you have to integrate equalities into the primary and secondary school curriculum, to ensure that attitudes are changed as early as possible and targeted th...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
03 Oct 2006
Budget Process 2007-08
Equalities reporting is a brilliant aspiration but, in reality, it falls well short of the target. I could sit here for the next two hours and give chapter and verse on where we are failing on gender, in particular. The basic pension for a lady is £60 a week, whereas for a man...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
03 Oct 2006
Budget Process 2007-08
In my two and a half years on the Finance Committee, I was impressed by the total impartiality of its financial analysis of all the documentation that came before it. The best thing that the Equal Opportunities Committee could do on equality issues in the budget is to demand—n...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
31 Oct 2006
Equalities Review
Before I ask a question, I want to make a point. Your document is very good, but it is headed "Views of Stakeholders" when it should be headed "Views of a Tiny Minority of Stakeholders". Paragraph 2.4 is headed "Age" and it includes a sweeping statement. It says:"One organisat...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
31 Oct 2006
Equalities Review
That should have been on the cover.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
31 Oct 2006
Equalities Review
Fair comment.Concerns were expressed at the interviews at the lack of equality group representation among MSPs. It was noted that political parties should recognise the need for equality as a priority. Should we regard that as symptomatic of wider public attitudes towards equa...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
31 Oct 2006
Equalities Review
Both reports highlight the central role of the media in relation to prejudice and discrimination and the urgent need to tackle them. Page 44 of the public attitudes report states:"The Citizens' Forum participants identified the need to challenge negative accounts in the media,...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
31 Oct 2006
Equalities Review
Do you agree that good news does not sell newspapers? Society wants to read all the grot that papers can print without being dragged before the courts.
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
31 Oct 2006
Equalities Review
Although I do not agree with it, we can publish it.
John Swinburne (Central Scotland) (SSCUP): SSCUP Committee
12 Dec 2006
Public Petitions Committee (Equalities Report)
Feedback from the Disability Rights Commission suggested that the Public Petitions Committee has been successful in attracting a high level of participation from disabled people. Have you analysed why that is the case? If so, what implications might there be for your work on t...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
12 Dec 2006
Public Petitions Committee (Equalities Report)
I was privileged to represent a constituent at the Public Petitions Committee. The person was concerned about having to sell their parent's home to pay for care. I compliment the committee on its excellent service. How the meeting was laid out and the way in which we were ques...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
12 Dec 2006
Public Petitions Committee (Equalities Report)
Have you given any thought to inviting comment from a wider range of equality-related organisations?
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
12 Dec 2006
Public Petitions Committee (Equalities Report)
Do you agree that the fact that there are no MSPs from ethnic minority backgrounds is a failure not on the part of the Public Petitions Committee, but on the part of the Parliament? Do you also agree that, until we achieve that, there will always be an imbalance when it comes ...
John Swinburne: SSCUP Committee
12 Dec 2006
Public Petitions Committee (Equalities Report)
Eight members' bills were passed in the first four years of the Parliament, but in this session only one has been successful. Do you think that the Public Petitions Committee could become a vehicle for members' bills?
← Back to list
Committee

Equal Opportunities Committee, 13 Sep 2005

13 Sep 2005 · S2 · Equal Opportunities Committee
Item of business
Equality Bill
Swinburne, John SSCUP Central Scotland Watch on SPTV
Clause 11(4) states that, in carrying out its duties,"the Commission shall have particular regard to the importance of exercising the powers … in relation to communities defined by reference to race, religion or belief."During early consultations on the establishment of the new body, people expressed concern that a hierarchy of equalities would be created. Are the witnesses concerned about the apparent prioritising of these particular communities in such a way?

In the same item of business

The Convener: Lab
Agenda item 2 is on the Equality Bill that is currently before the United Kingdom Parliament and on which the Scottish Executive intends to lodge a Sewel mot...
Tim Hopkins (Equality Network and Commission for Equality and Human Rights Steering Group):
We have felt all along that the Scotland commissioner will have a large workload. The existing three commissions each have a Scotland commissioner—those comm...
Ali Jarvis (Commission for Racial Equality):
Whether or not a formal deputy is the right route—that might just re-emphasise the feeling that "They are the Scottish people"—there must be a route to allow...
The Convener: Lab
Are you content with the provision under which the secretary of state will need the consent of the Scottish ministers on the appointment of a Scottish commis...
Tim Hopkins:
Our feeling was that the phrase, "who knows about conditions in Scotland",in the job requirement for the commissioner was weak. On the other hand, the Scotti...
Ali Jarvis:
Tim Hopkins has mentioned that the phrase,"who knows about conditions in Scotland",is weak. It is important to be sure what the person's specification for th...
The Convener: Lab
If you think that the phrase,"who knows about conditions in Scotland",is weak, how would you like it to be worded?
Ali Jarvis:
We have not discussed a preferred recommendation. The wording needs to be made stronger and should have more of a focus on the need to drive the agenda. The ...
Tim Hopkins:
I am not sure that the point that we are making requires a change to the bill; I think that the process will work in practice. A related point is that the me...
Adam Gaines (Disability Rights Commission):
It is important that the Scotland committee has representation from across a range of equality interests and from across Scotland. It should be reflective, r...
The Convener: Lab
That is the difficulty about one commissioner knowing about everything in Scotland. It sounds quite incredible.
Tim Hopkins:
That is why the Scotland committee is important. At the GB level, there will be the 10 to 15-member commission that will have a chair and, at the Scotland le...
Ali Jarvis:
Our view is that, even if there were two full-time commissioners, they would not be able to represent the equality interests of Scotland. The model that Tim ...
Marlyn Glen (North East Scotland) (Lab): Lab
I am impressed with your optimism about the possibility that all the commissioners will be knowledgeable about Scotland and will understand it. Are you conte...
Tim Hopkins:
That is not set out in the bill. If the model that we have been discussing is followed, we would get the result that we need, which is what you have just des...
Marlyn Glen: Lab
Should that be made explicit in the bill?
Tim Hopkins:
I do not think that we can legislate for everything; we will have to take some things on trust. The United Kingdom Government has already said in Parliament ...
Ali Jarvis:
Similarly, we cannot put job descriptions into legislation, but that is what we are starting to talk about when we think about the different types of experti...
The Convener: Lab
A lot of that will be in the guidance.
Tim Hopkins:
It is important that the appointments to the committee should be made in line with the public appointments process. The Scotland commissioner will be a publi...
Marlyn Glen: Lab
Is the panel content with the nature of the relationship that is embodied in clause 12(2) of the bill in relation to advising and making recommendations to t...
Tim Hopkins:
Yes.
Marlyn Glen: Lab
In evidence to the committee on 15 June 2004, John Wilkes noted: "The Scottish committee will play a crucial role, but for it to do that, it will need to hav...
John Wilkes (Equal Opportunities Commission):
Broadly speaking, the principle that is being established is that the promotional powers of the commission are delegated to Scotland and Wales. All the power...
Tim Hopkins:
As it stands, the bill is rather inconsistent. As John Wilkes said, the principle is to delegate to the Scotland committee the promotional powers but not the...
Marilyn Livingstone (Kirkcaldy) (Lab): Lab
Does the panel have any concerns about the operation of the disability committee in relation to the operation of the Scotland committee? Is the panel content...
Adam Gaines:
That was a concern previously, but the bill takes matters much further and clarifies the situation. There is now a duty on the disability committee to consul...
Mr McGrigor: Con
The explanatory notes accompanying the bill state that the estimated annual budget for the CEHR is £70 million. Are the witnesses content that that will be e...
John Wilkes:
Broadly speaking, we have concerns about the level of resource that is indicated to be allocated to the CEHR, although it is about £20 million more than the ...
Mr McGrigor: Con
Do you have a figure in mind of what the Scotland committee should get?