Committee
Health Committee, 15 Nov 2005
15 Nov 2005 · S2 · Health Committee
Item of business
Hepatitis C
I would like there to be an inquiry. I would like to ask the minister why we would avoid an inquiry because it would be a win-win situation for everybody. The tragedy is that so many people have lost faith in a certain part of the health service. Most people are not looking to litigate; when something does not go according to plan, all that they want is answers. It has been flagged up recently that certain notes have gone missing, as if there were a conspiracy out there, but an inquiry would clear that up. For the sake of people who, through no fault of their own, received blood products in good faith from medical people who also acted in good faith, we need to know when the blood transfusion service became aware that things were not quite right and why we took blood from people in prison and so on.
In the same item of business
The Convener:
SNP
Item 5 is discussion of the hepatitis C evidence session that we are planning. Members will remember that an evidence session to explore the case for an inde...
Dr Turner:
Ind
I would like there to be an inquiry. I would like to ask the minister why we would avoid an inquiry because it would be a win-win situation for everybody. Th...
The Convener:
SNP
We have to be careful not to go over ground that we have already covered. I advise members to look at the evidence that we have taken. You are saying that yo...
Dr Turner:
Ind
Not having one would throw up more doubt that could be clarified.
Janis Hughes (Glasgow Rutherglen) (Lab):
Lab
On that point, the evidence session would be helpful for members who were not on the committee when we first looked at the matter. Some of the issues that Je...
The Convener:
SNP
I urge people to look at what was covered in earlier days of the Health Committee, but members are entitled to ask questions.
Dr Turner:
Ind
People probably do not feel that questions have been completely answered.
The Convener:
SNP
That is a separate issue, Jean. It is worth looking at existing information submitted to the Health Committee.
Mike Rumbles:
LD
We have to be absolutely clear that two years ago, in September 2003, the then Minister for Health and Community Care, Malcolm Chisholm, told the committee t...
Mr Maxwell:
SNP
I apologise if what I talk about has been gone over previously. Obviously, as a committee substitute, I am not totally up to speed with some of the Health Co...
The Convener:
SNP
I suspect that, on that last question, the solicitor who will appear with the minister would be likely to say that the minister could not answer any question...
Mr Maxwell:
SNP
That might be the case. However, from my point of view, coming to the issue at this stage, what is important are the practical steps that led up to the situa...
The Convener:
SNP
Those are the three important aspects from your perspective. Does any other member wish to raise a point, make a comment or indicate what they might like to ...
Kate Maclean:
Lab
Presumably, if something occurs to us at the time, we can question the minister.
The Convener:
SNP
Absolutely. This is to try to clarify matters in advance. For example, if a question on one of Stewart Maxwell's areas of interest cannot be answered because...
Mr McNeil:
Lab
The focus must be on whether there is new evidence. Even in my short time on the committee in this parliamentary session, I have become aware of some of the ...
The Convener:
SNP
If any further questions occur to members over the next short period, can you ensure that they are communicated to the clerks? We want to try to clarify in a...
Meeting continued in private until 15:16.