Committee
Local Government and Transport Committee, 01 Nov 2005
01 Nov 2005 · S2 · Local Government and Transport Committee
Item of business
Budget Process 2006-07
It is a delight to be here this afternoon to consider the transport elements of the draft budget for 2006-07. I have some brief comments to make, which I hope will be of assistance to the committee in its assessment of the transport portfolio.The draft budget document for 2006-07 has been presented with some minor changes. The rationale behind most of those changes has been to highlight the key programme spending plans that will become the responsibility of the new transport agency. We have sought to provide as much clarity around that as we can. We have also taken into consideration some of the recommendations that the committee noted when the then Minister for Transport appeared before the committee to discuss stage 2 of last year's draft budget. Efficient government savings have been identified in the transport portfolio, and my team has been working with delivery partners to ensure that those savings are realised and delivered during the 2004 spending review period.The spending review process will enable us to look forward to future years of spending and to focus on priorities and key spending areas in transport. In simplistic terms, I want to ensure that I get everything that I can from the use of public money. Therefore, our priorities for delivery during the 2006-07 financial year are as follows. We wish to invest to maintain the momentum of our 10-year transport investment plan and our commitment to spend around £3 billion on transport capital infrastructure projects and service improvements over that period. As you know, I will also complete a review of transport capital projects in the next few weeks.We wish to maintain and improve Scotland's existing rail and trunk road networks. We wish to invest in public transport service improvements by, for example, promoting integrated ticketing, delivering a better deal for rail passengers in the new franchise and introducing a new bus route development fund—all better outputs for passengers across Scotland. We wish to extend the benefits of concessionary travel by introducing national schemes—one for older and disabled people, the other for younger people—and we need to ensure the delivery of our partnership agreement commitments to create the new transport agency for Scotland and a network of new regional transport partnerships.We want to ensure that, as one of the cross-cutting themes in Government, sustainable development and the environment are considered as part of transport spending. There is, in short, a two-part process. The first part is the work that my department is currently undertaking in relation to the national transport strategy. A draft strategy will be ready shortly, and a formal consultation on it will then take place. Within that will be a strategic environmental assessment of transport and the choices that are available to us, and to Parliament in scrutinising us, in that regard. The second element of the process is the Scottish transport appraisal guidance—STAG—which provides advice to planners and decision makers on the appraisal of transport projects where our support is necessary for those spends. The key criterion of STAG is the impact of the proposed transport interventions on the environment. The national transport strategy provides an opportunity—and will provide an opportunity during 2006—to launch a wider debate on the issues, to which I attach considerable importance.I also bring to the committee's attention some of the changes that we have introduced in the transport budget. The changes were raised by committee members in previous Local Government and Transport Committee discussions. Some of the changes are fairly technical.I want to raise four specific issues. First, table 8.01 in the draft budget for 2006-07 has been presented to reflect the level 2 spending plans that will be the responsibility of the new transport agency. I suspect that colleagues would expect us to provide that clarity, and I hope that the table goes some way towards helping you with that. The transport agency will be directly accountable for level 2 spending plans for rail services, concessionary fares, motorways and trunk roads. Some further level 3 programme expenditure within the other public transport line will also be the agency's responsibility.The second point is on the integrated transport fund. Its budget line in the draft budget for 2006-07 has been unbundled to reflect the expenditure for which the transport agency will be accountable and that for which the Enterprise, Transport and Lifelong Learning Department will be accountable. That is intended to give the committee as much clarity as we can.The third point relates to other public transport funding, which will increase by £7.5 million in 2006-07 and in 2007-08, to reflect the transfer from the Department for Transport of additional resources to undertake the new rail functions.The fourth and final point is on the additional funding of about £330 million for the additional rail powers for which the Scottish ministers have taken responsibility. That is not reflected in the draft budget but will be included in the budget bill for 2006-07 when it is introduced in January next year.All those aspects are part of the start of our major programme of structural reform. We are developing a new transport agency along with a new network of regional transport partnerships. I am confident that those structures will enable the right people, skills and experience to be brought to bear on our undoubtedly ambitious programme of infrastructure projects and service improvements that lie ahead of the department in the coming financial year.With those brief points, I hope that I have given a flavour of where we are. I am happy to answer questions.
In the same item of business
The Convener:
Lab
We shall hear evidence from both ministers with responsibility for our remit. The first is the Deputy Minister for Finance, Public Service Reform and Parliam...
The Deputy Minister for Finance, Public Service Reform and Parliamentary Business (George Lyon):
LD
It is a great pleasure to be with you this afternoon. I find myself in a similar situation to that of Mr McCabe when he attended the committee last year and ...
The Convener:
Lab
Before inviting questions from members, I should tell the committee that we have been advised by the broadcasters that there has been a difficulty with the b...
Meeting suspended.
On resuming—
The Convener:
Lab
I am advised that the broadcasting system is now ready to be used again. I will start off our questions on the pressures on local government and the potentia...
George Lyon:
LD
Allowance has been made for general pay and price inflation in the settlement. We look to local government to play its part in offsetting some costs through ...
The Convener:
Lab
There is still a bit of time in which to respond to the proposals for 2007-08, as next year's budget could make further adjustments to what is proposed. Howe...
George Lyon:
LD
Ultimately, as you know, those decisions are for local government, but it is clear that the Executive has been encouraging local government to be as conserva...
The Convener:
Lab
Does the Executive have any figures showing how far above 2.5 per cent the current indications suggest the average rise would be?
Graham Owenson (Scottish Executive Finance and Central Services Department):
We have some indicative figures for 2006-07, but they are not complete; we cannot give an overall number for the whole of Scotland because not all councils h...
The Convener:
Lab
How many local authorities do you have figures for? What is the range?
Graham Owenson:
I do not have those details to hand.
The Convener:
Lab
Would it be possible to supply those figures to the committee in writing?
George Lyon:
LD
We can certainly write to you. As soon as we have all the information in from local authorities, we shall respond to you on that point. There are certainly i...
The Convener:
Lab
You said that you want increases in the council tax collection rates—I am sure that everyone agrees with you on that. As you will be aware, council tax benef...
George Lyon:
LD
The Executive, working with local authorities, clearly wishes to see that figure improved. It is essential that everyone who is entitled to housing benefit m...
The Convener:
Lab
You mean council tax benefit, I think.
George Lyon:
LD
Yes, I mean council tax benefit. Sorry.
Bruce Crawford (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP):
SNP
I do not envy the minister's job in trying to deal with some of the obvious tensions in the system. The Finance Committee's budget adviser had confirmation f...
George Lyon:
LD
I should address your initial point that the impact of the efficiency savings on local government will be disproportionate. Local government has been asked t...
Bruce Crawford:
SNP
I understand what you are saying, but I have to point out that those words did not come from my mouth; I am simply using the terminology that the Finance Com...
George Lyon:
LD
I am quoting the actual figures. The adviser might well have been comparing the local government proposals with the original proposal that the Health Departm...
Bruce Crawford:
SNP
I have the information that was given to us by the Finance Committee—
George Lyon:
LD
I understand that, but I simply have to put on record the position with regard to efficiency savings and dispel the notion that you have expressed.
Bruce Crawford:
SNP
I realise that the equal pay issue has to be resolved between COSLA as the employer and the employees. However, local government did not introduce the legisl...
George Lyon:
LD
I make it clear that once we get a full picture of costs throughout Scotland—and we will not know them until most of the agreements have been hammered out—we...
Bruce Crawford:
SNP
I have other questions, but I will let other members ask theirs first.
Mr David Davidson (North East Scotland) (Con):
Con
Can I assume that the figures that you quoted were not real-terms figures? What you were handing out sounded very optimistic.
George Lyon:
LD
The figures in my opening speech were cash figures.