Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,354,908
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 60 of 2,354,908 contributions. Latest 30 days: 0. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 25 Mar 2026.
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Thank you. We might return to your offer to talk about stage 2 amendments, depending on how the questioning goes. You are free to call on your officials to pick up on more detailed points, as you said.Will the creation of a new set of interpretation rules that are different fr...
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
For the sake of tidiness, have any definitions in the Interpretation Act 1978 or the interpretation order—the Scotland Act 1998 (Transitory and Transitional Provisions) (Publication and Interpretation etc of Acts of the Scottish Parliament) Order 1999—been omitted from schedul...
The Convener (Jamie Stone): LD Committee
28 Apr 2009
Draft Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill
I welcome everyone to the committee's 14th meeting this year. We have received apologies from Jackson Carlaw. I ask everyone to switch off their mobile phones and BlackBerrys.I welcome the Minister for Parliamentary Business, Bruce Crawford, and Jan Marshall, Madeleine MacKenz...
The Convener (Jamie Stone): LD Committee
15 Sep 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I welcome everyone to the 24th meeting this year of the Subordinate Legislation Committee. I have received no apologies; we have a full house. I ask everyone to turn off their mobile phones and so on.Item 1 is consideration of the delegated powers in parts 4 and 5 of the Inter...
Jamie Stone (Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) (LD): LD Chamber
13 Jan 2010
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
As the convener of the Subordinate Legislation Committee, I am very pleased to take part in the debate. Ten years into devolution, the bill ties up the several loose ends that were bequeathed to us, inter alia, by the Scotland Act 1998. In the limited time that is available to...
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
The second item on our agenda is the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill. This is our first evidence session on the bill. Next week, we will hear from the Minister for Parliamentary Business. Today, we have three panels of witnesses. We will hear first from t...
Mr Jamie Stone (Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) (LD): LD Committee
27 Apr 2004
Budget Process 2005-06
As I have mentioned to the minister before, I have a technical point about sportscotland. I appreciate that the relationship between the minister and sportscotland must involve a certain distance, but a small football club in east Sutherland has not been able to get a grant be...
Mr Stone: LD Committee
27 Apr 2004
Budget Process 2005-06
The organisation to which I refer is seeking capital funding rather than revenue funding. I am talking here about Embo Amateur Football Club, which is near Dornoch. The money that the club needs is very small in the overall scheme of things, but it would help the club's young ...
The Convener: LD Committee
06 Nov 2007
Scottish Government Responses
Thank you. That is a sensible suggestion; it means that we keep on the rails the progress of events that are necessary to the governance of Scotland. I take it that there is general agreement to that.The Government's response implied that the committee strayed into policy issu...
The Convener: LD Committee
11 Dec 2007
Instruments Subject <br />to Annulment
I was about to move on to the instrument on fishery products, and almost missed the one on seeds. The Greens will take issue with me. I am so sorry. Seeds are very important to us all.Are members content that we should ask the Scottish Government whether the reference to "regu...
The Convener: LD Committee
11 Mar 2008
Instrument Not Laid Before <br />the Parliament
We have a choice here. First, are members content that the Scottish Government's interpretation as to the scope of the enabling power is reasonable?
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Jun 2008
Delegated Powers Scrutiny
The bill is a member's bill proposed by Patrick Harvie MSP and we are considering it at stage 1. The bill contains but one delegated power, which is the commencement provision at section 3. On section 3, "Commencement and short title", are members content to ask the member in ...
The Convener: LD Committee
18 Nov 2008
Instruments not laid before the Parliament
Thank you. We have all seen the correspondence between Jonathan Mitchell QC and our clerk. It is useful to have what Ian McKee has said on the record. I am no lawyer, but the way in which the law and the courts operate is open to change and interpretation. That is a useful sta...
The Convener: LD Committee
20 Jan 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill
First, are members content to note the consultation on the draft bill and, secondly, do we agree to invite the Minister for Parliamentary Business to give evidence on the draft bill following the end of the consultation, so that discussions with the minister can be informed by...
The Convener: LD Committee
20 Jan 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill
Our next meeting will be on 27 January in a committee room that is yet to be revealed to us.
The Convener (Jamie Stone): LD Committee
21 Apr 2009
Decision on Taking Business in Private
Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Subordinate Legislation Committee's 13th meeting in 2009. We have received no apologies—we have a full house. I hope that members had a restful break over Easter. I ask everybody to turn off mobile phones and BlackBerrys.Agenda item...
The Convener: LD Committee
28 Apr 2009
Draft Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill
I now invite members to put questions to the minister or his officials. We start with Helen Eadie.
The Convener: LD Committee
28 Apr 2009
Draft Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill
I see. After that interesting exchange, let me pose our final questions, which are about pre-consolidation modification of enactments. Will the minister send the committee a note on how the proposed procedure would work in practice?I have two further specific questions. First,...
The Convener: LD Committee
28 Apr 2009
Draft Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill
That would be useful.As there are no further questions, it falls to me simply to thank the minister. However, before I do so, let me just clarify that today's evidence-taking session was an exploration of the issues and is in no way the end result of the committee's hard views...
The Convener: LD Committee
28 Apr 2009
Draft Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill
The same was true for us, minister. Thank you very much.We will pause for just a few seconds while our guests leave us.
The Convener (Jamie Stone): LD Committee
05 May 2009
Decision on Taking Business in Private
I welcome everyone to the 15th meeting in 2009 of the Subordinate Legislation Committee. We have received apologies from Jackson Carlaw and Tom McCabe. Mobile phones should be turned off, please.Agenda item 1 is a decision on whether to take item 8 in private. Under item 8, we...
The Convener (Jamie Stone): LD Committee
23 Jun 2009
Decision on Taking Business in Private
I welcome everyone to the 21st meeting of the Subordinate Legislation Committee in 2009. We have received apologies from Helen Eadie. I ask everyone to switch off their BlackBerrys and mobile phones.Agenda item 1 is to decide whether to take item 6 in private. Under that item ...
The Convener: LD Committee
01 Sep 2009
Decision on Taking Business in Private
The next item is to decide whether to hold our discussion next week about our approach to oral evidence on the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill in private. I take it that we agree on that.
The Convener: LD Committee
15 Sep 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Part 5 of the bill relates to orders that are subject to special parliamentary procedure. Does the committee agree that it has no concerns to highlight to the SPPA committee on delegated powers in relation to part 5, but that we will reconsider part 5 once the SPPA committee h...
The Convener: LD Committee
06 Oct 2009
Instruments not laid before the Parliament
That is it, folks. The next meeting is on Tuesday 27 October at 2.15pm, when we will take oral evidence on the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill.I wish everyone a relaxing short break. My thanks go to the official report, the clerks and the legal team.
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Item 2 is our second evidence session on the bill. I welcome the minister for Parliament—his proper title is Minister for Parliamentary Business—Mr Bruce Crawford. With him are Elspeth MacDonald, Madeleine MacKenzie, Alison Fraser, Fraser Gough and Carol Snow—Interruption. I a...
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Thank you. My second question arises from something that Iain Jamieson said to the committee last week. Section 1(2)(b) provides that the provisions of part 1 do not apply in so far as"the context of the Act or instrument otherwise requires".Iain Jamieson suggested that that p...
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Thank you. Again on section 1(2)(b), the Scottish Law Commission suggested to us that the provisions in part 1 would be more use to the reader if the qualifications in section 1(2)(b) were repeated in individual rules rather than being a general qualification that readers woul...
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
We have a robust response from the minister.
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Now you may never be asked to Balmoral.
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Minister, let us return to the letter that you wrote to me on 20 October. This question is about electronic communications versus ink on paper. In the letter you say that you intend to make minor amendments to section 26 to clarify that consent to service by electronic means r...
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
That would be helpful.You mentioned a letter that was written in September. We have been checking for that. We have a letter that was written in October. The matter could be covered when you write to us.
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
That would be super; it would be helpful from both sides' points of view. That is now on the record.
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
As a great royalist, Dr Ian McKee would like to ask you about the Queen's printer for Scotland.
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Section 47(5) of the bill says:"‘consolidation', in relation to the law on a particular subject, includes the restatement of the common law in relation to the subject."Last week, our friends the Scottish Law Commission told us that, because of the difficulty in securing agreem...
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Perhaps I misunderstand you. Does what you are saying not simply amount to a continuation of what has gone before? Would there not be some value in the Scottish Government considering a bill to address the issue that I am talking about, which is the inclusion of common law?
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Indeed. Perhaps we had better move on swiftly while the convener still has a limited grip of the issue.
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Have you finished, Malcolm?
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
That concludes our questions, although I will not let you off quite yet, minister. In response to your offer, I am bound to say that there is work to be done on consolidation, certainly in relation to the health service and criminal justice. The Scottish Law Commission can do ...
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
If there are no more questions, it remains for me only to thank you and your team for coming and for the thought and effort that have gone into your answers. Your comments have been helpful and we will deliberate on them in due course.
The Convener: LD Committee
03 Nov 2009
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Thank you.
Mr Jamie Stone (Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) (LD): LD Chamber
19 Sep 2002
Debt Arrangement and Attachment (Scotland) Bill:<br />Stage 1
I pay tribute to the members of the working group that put together "Striking the Balance". It is evident, when one reads the bill and that report, that a great deal of serious, detailed work has been put into the matter. That is an example of the Parliament at its best.There ...
Mr Stone: LD Chamber
05 Dec 2002
Future of Europe Convention
Some people have said that. The point is that the past is the past and we cannot change it. However, we can change the future. As Dr Ewing will recall, when the decision was made, John Farquhar Munro and I—and others—made what I believe was the cogent argument that had Inverne...
Mr Jamie Stone (Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) (LD): LD Chamber
13 Feb 2003
Tourism
Although we should recognise that the figures for 2002 are good news, the minister has hinted that the situation is slightly patchy and our interpretation of the report is dependent on what members here in the chamber say about it. For example, Annabel Goldie gave us a very el...
Mr Stone: LD Chamber
11 Sep 2003
Obesity
Yes, I am grateful. I am naturally skinny, which is lucky. I would like to make two points, both of which arise from Eleanor Scott's thoughtful contribution. I am sure that we all appreciated the story of the leisure centre, but we do not all have leisure centres. For reasons ...
The Convener (Jamie Stone): LD Committee
01 Dec 2009
Draft Instrument subject to Approval
I welcome everyone to the 32nd meeting of the Subordinate Legislation Committee in 2009. We have no apologies and we have a full house. Can everyone turn off their mobile phones and BlackBerrys please?As previously agreed, at the end of the meeting we will go into private sess...
The Convener: LD Committee
01 Dec 2009
Draft Instrument subject to Approval
Colleagues, there are a number of grounds for reporting the order. First, the Scottish Government has acknowledged that the order contains errors in the preamble and in article 11, the latter being a substantial error that could significantly affect the proper operation of the...
The Convener: LD Committee
01 Dec 2009
Instruments not laid before the Parliament
As indicated at the start of the meeting, we agreed at last week's meeting that we would move into private session to discuss our report on the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill. I thank the official report.
The Convener (Jamie Stone): LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
Decision on Taking Business in Private
I welcome everyone to the 27th meeting this year of the Subordinate Legislation Committee. We have received apologies from Tom McCabe. I remind members to turn off mobiles and BlackBerrys.Under item 8, we will consider evidence on the Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Sco...
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
The question will indeed be in the Official Report. You may want to consider it and give us a reasoned response.
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
All right. We will have a gentleman's agreement on that. It was a tricky question. Let us move on.
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Okay. Let us move on.I have several questions on the definitions of words and expressions. In its written submission, the faculty expressed the view that the Scottish ministers should not have the power to amend definitions in schedule 1 by order. What are the reasons for your...
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
What could the effect be of amending definitions or adding new ones? Could the effect be retrospective? Would it not be complicated to identify the provisions to which the new definition applied? Could there not be a mess?
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Has Brian Gill thought of one?
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
That is an interesting thought. We will probably return to the matter.
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Yes, applying a sort of building blocks test rather than a frequency of use test.
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Time is marching on. Do members have any further questions?
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
As MSPs, we know that we must treat some electronic information with extreme caution, especially if it comes from Nigeria. In his 10 and a bit years as an MSP, my colleague John Farquhar Munro has never switched on a computer. He relies on his staff.
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Thank you for your thoughtful, considered evidence, to which we will give proper weight. Enjoy the rest of the day. Jackson Carlaw must leave us now. After a short break, we will hear from the second panel.
The Convener: LD Committee
27 Oct 2009
<br />Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I extend a warm welcome to our second set of witnesses, representing the Scottish Law Commission. We have with us Patrick Layden QC, commissioner, and Gregor Clark CB, parliamentary counsel. We look forward to your contribution.
← Back to list
Committee

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 03 Nov 2009

03 Nov 2009 · S3 · Subordinate Legislation Committee
Item of business
Interpretation and Legislative Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Stone, Jamie LD Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross Watch on SPTV
Thank you. We might return to your offer to talk about stage 2 amendments, depending on how the questioning goes. You are free to call on your officials to pick up on more detailed points, as you said.Will the creation of a new set of interpretation rules that are different from the rules in the Interpretation Act 1978 and the interpretation order result in inconsistency and create confusion for practitioners and end users of the law?

In the same item of business

The Convener: LD
Item 2 is our second evidence session on the bill. I welcome the minister for Parliament—his proper title is Minister for Parliamentary Business—Mr Bruce Cra...
The Minister for Parliamentary Business (Bruce Crawford): SNP
I have a few minutes of introductory remarks to set the tone and give the background to where we are. It would be useful to put on the record some informatio...
The Convener: LD
Thank you. We might return to your offer to talk about stage 2 amendments, depending on how the questioning goes. You are free to call on your officials to p...
Bruce Crawford: SNP
Let us start by considering part 1, which sets out a series of default rules for the interpretation of future acts of the Scottish Parliament and future subo...
The Convener: LD
Thank you. My second question arises from something that Iain Jamieson said to the committee last week. Section 1(2)(b) provides that the provisions of part ...
Bruce Crawford: SNP
I will let Colin Wilson respond to that.
Colin Wilson (Scottish Government Office of the Scottish Parliamentary Counsel):
The first point to note is that the provision in section 1(2)(b) is not new; it simply replicates the existing position. It is a generalised version of the q...
The Convener: LD
Thank you. Again on section 1(2)(b), the Scottish Law Commission suggested to us that the provisions in part 1 would be more use to the reader if the qualifi...
Bruce Crawford: SNP
I will let Colin Wilson say something if he wants to, but I do not agree with the suggestion. The reader needs to be aware of the general provisions in secti...
Colin Wilson:
I do not have anything to add to that.
Bruce Crawford: SNP
I have probably shown the distinction. Because section 1(2) is a general provision about the circumstances in which part 1 does not apply, section 1 is the a...
Ian McKee (Lothians) (SNP): SNP
The concern that was expressed to us was that often a person who is not legally qualified reads the provisions, and it is sometimes difficult for them to rea...
Bruce Crawford: SNP
When someone examines any piece of legislation, the appropriate place for them to start is at the beginning, where the ground rules are set and the foundatio...
Ian McKee: SNP
The concern was put to us in evidence.
Bruce Crawford: SNP
Many—although perhaps not all—acts of the Scottish Parliament lay out the ground rules in part 1 and explain how they will apply to the rest of the legislati...
Colin Wilson:
Yes. There are other provisions, such as interpretation provisions, at the end of an act. There are real risks in looking at provisions in isolation without ...
Bruce Crawford: SNP
That is the key point.
The Convener: LD
We have a robust response from the minister.
Malcolm Chisholm (Edinburgh North and Leith) (Lab): Lab
The application of acts and instruments to the Crown has been one of the more controversial aspects of the bill. That was reflected in the evidence that we t...
Bruce Crawford: SNP
I was surprised by the strength of feeling on the subject. I would have thought that, after 30 years, we would want to modernise a piece of legislation and t...
The Convener: LD
Now you may never be asked to Balmoral.
Bruce Crawford: SNP
That is probably finished now.
Malcolm Chisholm: Lab
I tend to agree with you on the issue, so I am probably not the best person to pursue it with you. I do not know whether my colleagues want to or whether the...
Bruce Crawford: SNP
That is a technical question, so I will let Colin Wilson deal with it.
Colin Wilson:
Section 8 deals with acts of the Scottish Parliament that are to come into force by commencement order. It allows commencement orders to make provision for d...
Malcolm Chisholm: Lab
So, it would not apply in general; it would just apply to certain transitional provisions. Is that what you are saying?
Colin Wilson:
I am suggesting that if the power is there, it is a matter of judgment in each case as to whether its use is appropriate and whether the case is simple and s...
Jackson Carlaw (West of Scotland) (Con): Con
I have a couple of questions on sections 12 and 14, which deal with references to European Union and other legislative provisions. In connection with section...
Bruce Crawford: SNP
Given that we are talking about ambulatory issues in legislation, I will hand over to Colin Wilson.
Colin Wilson:
It might be helpful if I provided a bit of explanation. It is worth setting out that section 12 creates certainty as to what is meant where legislation refer...