Committee
Local Government and Transport Committee, 27 Sep 2005
27 Sep 2005 · S2 · Local Government and Transport Committee
Item of business
Licensing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
The amendments in the group increase fine levels for the failure of a holder of a premises licence or a personal licence and an applicant for a personal licence to notify the licensing board of a conviction for a relevant offence. We consider that both sets of fine levels have been set too low with regard to the seriousness of a failure to notify a conviction.At the time of an application for a personal or a premises licence, notification is, of course, given to the chief constable, who will inform the board at that time of any relevant offences. Once the application has been determined, the holder is under an obligation under section 41, in relation to a premises licence holder, or section 73, in relation to a personal licence holder, to notify the board of any relevant convictions.Section 66 caters for the period in between for personal licence applicants and ensures that there are no gaps. There is currently no equivalent to section 66 for premises licence applications, so we intend to lodge an amendment at stage 3 to ensure consistency of approach. Sections 41 and 73 relate to premises and personal licence holders, who currently attract a fine at level 3 on the standard scale. The amendments provide for the fine to be increased to level 4. An offence by a licence holder is considered to be more serious than one by an applicant, because the period for which the licence is held is either 10 years for a personal licence or in perpetuity for a premises licence, whereas the period of an application is only a few weeks. In practice, that means a fine under section 66 of £1,000 and under sections 41 and 73 of £2,500.I move amendment 166.
In the same item of business
The Convener:
Lab
In our stage 2 consideration of the Licensing (Scotland) Bill today, we will go no further than section 114. I aim for a finish time of approximately 4.30 pm...
Section 26 agreed to.
Section 27—Application to vary premises licence
The Convener:
Lab
Amendment 163, in the name of David Davidson, is grouped with amendments 164, 165 and 168 to 170.
Mr Davidson:
Con
The amendments would remove the requirement that a change in the manager of a premises should be classed as a variation, given the associated cost, time and ...
The Deputy Minister for Finance, Public Service Reform and Parliamentary Business (George Lyon):
LD
I share David Davidson's objective, but I hope that he will see that, as I will explain, we have already taken cognisance of it and provided for it in the bi...
Mr Davidson:
Con
The minister mentioned that one or two clerks, who are skilled in these matters, have taken a view that the wording of the bill is inadequate and open to var...
The Convener:
Lab
The question is, that amendment 163 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members:
No.
The Convener:
Lab
There will be a division.
ForDavidson, Mr David (North East Scotland) (Con)AgainstArbuckle, Mr Andrew (Mid Scotland and Fife) (LD)Crawford, Bruce (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP)Ewing, F...
The Convener:
Lab
The result of the division is: For 1, Against 8, Abstentions 0.
Amendment 163 disagreed to.
The Convener:
Lab
Amendment 38, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendment 39.
George Lyon:
LD
The bill provides for different procedures on the variations to a premises licence, depending on whether the variation is a minor variation, which I spoke ab...
Fergus Ewing:
SNP
I can see the logic of replacing the definition in section 27(6)(a) by that in amendment 38—indeed, one could say that the logic is robust. However, might th...
George Lyon:
LD
That point has been well taken. I assure Fergus Ewing that we are aware that there might be a temptation to go for as broad an operating plan as possible. We...
The Convener:
Lab
I should not really have let you come in there, minister, because other members want to speak.
Mr Davidson:
Con
I came across a situation recently in which somebody had reconstructed a barn restaurant premises and realised afterwards that it would have been far more se...
George Lyon:
LD
Cases will be dealt with individually, but I expect that a change of that magnitude would be deemed a major variation.
Amendment 38 agreed to.
Amendment 39 moved—George Lyon—and agreed to.
Amendment 164 not moved.
Section 27, as amended, agreed to.
Section 28—Determination of application for variation
Amendment 148 moved—Mr David Davidson.
The Convener:
Lab
The question is, that amendment 148 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members:
No.
The Convener:
Lab
There will be a division.
ForDavidson, Mr David (North East Scotland) (Con)AgainstArbuckle, Mr Andrew (Mid Scotland and Fife) (LD)Crawford, Bruce (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP)Ewing, F...