Committee
Procedures Committee, 20 Dec 2005
20 Dec 2005 · S2 · Procedures Committee
Item of business
Procedural Guidance
The next item concerns the revised "Guidance on Private Bills", which is a substantial document. The new bits in the guidance are highlighted in grey. In light of what Karen Gillon was saying, do we want to go more carefully through the grey bits? The guidance is fairly detailed. Could we agree that members who have concerns about the guidance could submit them to the clerk? Fergus Cochrane from the private bills unit is here to tell us about the revisions to the guidance. Could you focus on what, in your view, is most important in the grey bits, so that the committee has a better introduction to the issues that they raise?
In the same item of business
The Convener:
LD
The next item concerns the revised "Guidance on Private Bills", which is a substantial document. The new bits in the guidance are highlighted in grey. In lig...
Fergus Cochrane (Scottish Parliament Directorate of Clerking and Reporting):
Essentially, the guidance seeks to implement the changes that were outlined in the committee's fourth report of 2005, on private legislation. The main change...
Karen Gillon:
Lab
I assume that you know much of what is proposed in our next report. How will that affect the guidance?
Fergus Cochrane:
This version of the guidance was prepared on the back of the committee's fourth report. We understand that, in the light of the committee's next report, on t...
Karen Gillon:
Lab
Would it not make more sense to issue revised guidance on the back of both reports? It seems a bit premature to issue new guidance on a procedure that we kno...
Fergus Cochrane:
We considered that point. However, some of the changes that we have incorporated into the new version of the guidance are to do with requirements that promot...
The Convener:
LD
Therefore, publishing the guidance is related to the hoped-for timetable for putting the three new bills into effect.
Fergus Cochrane:
Yes.
Karen Gillon:
Lab
When did we publish our previous report on private bills and when was it debated by Parliament? It was some time ago. I am concerned at the time that it has ...
Andrew Mylne:
I think that the committee's fourth report was debated in May.
Karen Gillon:
Lab
Therefore, there was a lag of six months in getting the guidance published.
Fergus Cochrane:
Not all the changes that this version of the guidance contains were made solely on the back of the Procedures Committee's report. Many of the changes came ab...
The Convener:
LD
I would like to pursue Karen Gillon's point. Say, for the sake of argument, that we approve this revised guidance so that it can be sent to the promoters, ev...
Fergus Cochrane:
I think so. I suspect that many of the changes to this version of the guidance will carry forward to a future version. I suspect that most of the changes to ...
The Convener:
LD
If we agree this guidance and, in half an hour's time, we agree another set of proposals, will the cumulative effect be to delay the bills by another six mon...
Fergus Cochrane:
No.
Karen Gillon:
Lab
What would be the timescale for producing revised guidance? I assume that guidance will have to be issued before our report is published and debated by Parli...
Fergus Cochrane:
I have not given much thought to how long publishing the guidance will take. I suspect that it may take another two or three months to prepare guidance on th...
The Convener:
LD
Therefore, the guidance is mostly based on the previous report by this committee, but it has been influenced by proposals of the Waverley Railway (Scotland) ...
Fergus Cochrane:
Yes.
Karen Gillon:
Lab
I am concerned that if we agree the guidance today, there will be no impetus for the next report to get through the guidance process timeously. I am concerne...
The Convener:
LD
If we agree the revised guidance now and the proposal to have someone hear the objections goes through Parliament, can the forthcoming railway bills progress...
Fergus Cochrane:
Yes. The preparation of a further version of the guidance to reflect the role of assessors would need to be prioritised in order not to delay any of the bill...
Karen Gillon:
Lab
I suppose that my question is for the Scottish Parliament directorate of legal services. If we issue guidance that people use on the introduction of a bill a...
Elspeth MacDonald (Scottish Parliament Directorate of Legal Services):
If the Parliament approves the revised guidance, it can indicate at the time of approval when it wants the changes to the standing orders to come into effect...
Karen Gillon:
Lab
Could the standing orders be applied retrospectively to bills that had just been introduced?
The Convener:
LD
Our report will be debated in January and any changes to the standing orders will be agreed to at that time. The new standing orders will take effect, allowi...
Karen Gillon:
Lab
If, for example, the Glasgow airport rail link bill is introduced in the first week in January and the debate on the revised guidance takes place in the seco...
Elspeth MacDonald:
It could be dealt with under the new procedures if the Parliament made it clear that that is what it wanted. It is not a retrospective—
Karen Gillon:
Lab
It would be a matter for the text of the motion that the Procedures Committee lodged.