Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,354,908
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 60 of 2,354,908 contributions. Latest 30 days: 0. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 25 Mar 2026.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
21 Sep 1999
McIntosh Report
The recommendation states:"a panel of advisers should be appointed, by Ministers jointly with COSLA and subject to the approval of the Parliament".That is interesting.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
02 Oct 2001
Instruments Subject to Approval
So we are talking about situations that are straightforward and routine, with nothing controversial or novel—situations that, like this, are repetitive.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
22 Jan 2002
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
Such as article 6 and schedule 1.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
22 Jan 2002
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
We are also concerned about paragraph 2 of schedule 3.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
05 Feb 2002
Draft Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
Perhaps the Executive is being obtuse.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
05 Feb 2002
Draft Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
No, I said that the Executive was being obtuse.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
05 Feb 2002
Draft Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
We must query it.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
05 Feb 2002
Draft Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
It seems okay.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
19 Mar 2002
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
In an informal letter?
Colin Campbell (West of Scotland) (SNP): SNP Committee
07 May 2002
Draft Instruments<br />Subject to Approval
Regulation 9 says that an authority must notify an applicant of its decision within seven days, but the regulation does not say how long the authority has to come to a decision. That would seem to be fairly fundamental, given what authorities can get up to when it comes to res...
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
07 May 2002
Draft Instruments<br />Subject to Approval
I think that it is.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
07 May 2002
Draft Instruments<br />Subject to Approval
A loch?
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
07 May 2002
Draft Instruments<br />Subject to Approval
Good.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
07 May 2002
Draft Instruments<br />Subject to Approval
It is not a parcel that one would turn down.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
07 May 2002
Draft Instruments<br />Subject to Approval
Following the Glasgow airport link, of course.
Colin Campbell (West of Scotland) (SNP): SNP Committee
14 May 2002
Executive Responses
I do not think that it is our function to pass judgment on individuals who choose to get married or on where they choose to get married. The provision of the approval of persons seems superfluous.
Colin Campbell (West of Scotland) (SNP): SNP Committee
27 May 2002
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
No points arise on the regulations.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
27 May 2002
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
No, I was not.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
27 May 2002
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
I do not know. Gordon Jackson would know. He is riveted by Norway's fate.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
27 May 2002
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
Should the order not say that it supersedes an earlier draft?
Colin Campbell (West of Scotland) (SNP): SNP Committee
03 Sep 2002
Draft Instruments <br />Subject to Approval
This is all right.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
03 Sep 2002
Instruments Subject to Approval
These are all in order.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
24 Sep 2002
Instruments Subject to Approval
No points arise on the order.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
29 Oct 2002
Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
Is that an accident or a new precedent?
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
29 Oct 2002
Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
That is fine.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
12 Nov 2002
Draft Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
We scrutinise the instruments properly.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
19 Nov 2002
Draft Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
What a fount of knowledge you are, convener.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
19 Nov 2002
Draft Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
Do you think that they missed out the fourth paragraph?
Colin Campbell (West of Scotland) (SNP): SNP Committee
03 Dec 2002
Draft Instrument Subject <br />to Approval
The draft order seems okay.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
17 Dec 2002
Draft Instrument Subject <br />to Approval
The order seems okay. No points arise from it.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
17 Dec 2002
Instrument Subject <br />to Approval
No points arise on the order.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
28 Jan 2003
Draft Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
No arguments have raged in the Subordinate Legislation Committee.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
28 Jan 2003
Instruments Subject <br />to Approval
No points arise on the order.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
04 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments <br />Subject to Approval
No points arise on the order.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
04 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments <br />Subject to Approval
No points arise on the order.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
04 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments <br />Subject to Approval
I mean that no legal points arise on the order.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
04 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments <br />Subject to Approval
No points arise on the regulations.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
04 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments <br />Subject to Approval
No points arise on the regulations.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
04 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments <br />Subject to Approval
So there is no established quorum.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
11 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
No points arise on the instrument.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
We do not have a cringe; it is an assertion.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
If you want to adopt in Südtirol. There is much adoption from Russia, if you are interested.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
Apart from the point about indicating that the instrument is Scottish, the acronym SFGS is meaningless as it stands. Never mind the word "Scottish"—the words "forestry grant scheme" should be used.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
On a via media—a middle way.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
Tradition is a good thing.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
You would not.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
The bill did not go far enough.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
I thought that you said "the bill".
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
This piece of Scottish legislation.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
They are probably equally offensive to an applicant.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
Your explanation is probably right.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
If you were on the M8 leaving Hillington in a westward direction, you would pass out of Glasgow and into Renfrewshire and, being in that lane, you would have no option going west other than to continue in that direction or crash.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
A highly dangerous and very illegal U-turn. There are certain roads on which you are committed.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
No, I am not in that category.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
18 Feb 2003
Draft Instruments Subject to Approval
But it is a strange thing to try to define.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
25 Feb 2003
Draft Instrument <br />Subject to Approval
Indeed. In paragraph 8 of schedule 1, the word "plan" is a bit odd. It probably should have been "place", because section 1 of the Abortion Act 1967 makes provision for the secretary of state to approve places, but makes no mention of plans.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
25 Feb 2003
Draft Instrument <br />Subject to Approval
I have just been wondering whether in paragraph 20 of part 2 of schedule 4 on page 14, the reference might be to—
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
25 Feb 2003
Draft Instrument <br />Subject to Approval
—of the Local Government etc (Scotland) Act 1994. Laughter.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
25 Feb 2003
Draft Instrument <br />Subject to Approval
We have an incredible amount of knowledge here.
Colin Campbell: SNP Committee
25 Feb 2003
Instruments Subject to Approval
One should be sufficient.
← Back to list
Committee

Local Government Committee, 21 Sep 1999

21 Sep 1999 · S1 · Local Government Committee
Item of business
McIntosh Report
The recommendation states:"a panel of advisers should be appointed, by Ministers jointly with COSLA and subject to the approval of the Parliament".That is interesting.

In the same item of business

The Convener (Trish Godman): Lab
We now enter the formal meeting, colleagues, and I welcome the public who have slipped in quietly at the back. We are going through the McIntosh report recom...
Mr Kenneth Gibson (Glasgow) (SNP): SNP
I am sure that we had a discussion on 8.
The Convener: Lab
Recommendations 7 and 8 are together.
Mr Gibson: SNP
We had the committee report on it—I think that we should go straight to 9.
The Convener: Lab
Okay, we will go straight to recommendation 9, which deals with the electoral system. It is the bit that the Kerley committee will examine. How do we see it ...
Mr Keith Harding (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con): Con
I think that this one should be pulled back for further discussion. The Conservatives believe that unless we can maintain the link between the councillor and...
Mr Gibson: SNP
Perhaps I could offer a clarification. We are discussing which recommendations are contentious and which are not. The electoral system is a contentious issue...
Bristow Muldoon (Livingston) (Lab): Lab
It is largely a question of practicality. It depends on what sort of electoral system we eventually agree on. If there was a substantial difference about, sa...
Mr Gibson: SNP
I cannot agree with that. If we agree on the system by next summer, we could have two or possibly three years to implement it. The boundary changes for the r...
Mr Gil Paterson (Central Scotland) (SNP): SNP
I understand Bristow's point, but Kenny is saying that if we reach a conclusion there is no need to hold back. That principle would apply everywhere. It woul...
Mr Michael McMahon (Hamilton North and Bellshill) (Lab): Lab
It is always a good principle not to put the cart before the horse. We might not be able to say for certain that the electoral system that we choose can be i...
Johann Lamont (Glasgow Pollok) (Lab): Lab
Time scales should not be an issue when dealing with matters of principle. Any change should be implemented in the time it takes to implement it effectively,...
Donald Gorrie (Central Scotland) (LD): LD
With regard to the time scale, I would have thought that we could reasonably say that any change should be introduced without avoidable delay. We all know th...
The Convener: Lab
You are right: that is not in the bullet points and there was no such comment by McIntosh. On the other hand, we are examining the report and, if we agree, p...
Colin Campbell (West of Scotland) (SNP): SNP
We will be accountable at the next general election. That might not come soon enough for some of the electorate, but it will always be hanging over us in one...
Johann Lamont: Lab
The debate is really about competing principles and priorities. We all have the election ahead of us—you are quite right. However, as Kenny said in an earlie...
Colin Campbell: SNP
When I was a councillor, my party put me on the list and the people had no choice about whether they would get me or somebody else as their council candidate...
Mr Gibson: SNP
Before a candidate even gets on to a list, they must get past the party's interview panel. We can argue over the democracy of that. The Dennis Canavan situat...
Bristow Muldoon: Lab
Should we deal with that now or should we wait until we have the Kerley report, which will include evidence from a range of sources and consider all the ques...
Mr Gibson: SNP
I must apologise—I was just looking for agreement with a view to legislation being introduced for the next elections. I was not trying to open a debate on th...
Bristow Muldoon: Lab
As Donald says, those changes were problematic.
Dr Sylvia Jackson (Stirling) (Lab): Lab
We are in danger of making heavy weather of this exercise. In referring to what I said previously—is distinguishing between contentious and semi-contentious ...
The Convener: Lab
I agree, although I was enjoying the discussion. We were beginning to get our teeth into something and I did not particularly want to stop members.Another re...
Colin Campbell: SNP
I think that there will be considerable discussion on that point.
The Convener: Lab
There will.Recommendation 12 says:"The legislation governing the Local Government Boundary Commission should be reviewed with a view to providing greater fle...
Bristow Muldoon: Lab
I do not think that the proposal is controversial; most people will agree with it.
The Convener: Lab
Do Keith and Sylvia agree?
Mr Harding: Con
I agree—I do not think that a review of the legislation would be contentious.
Colin Campbell: SNP
Although the boundaries themselves might be contentious, the principle that they should fit communities better is not.
Johann Lamont: Lab
It would be contentious—although not necessarily bad—to start to redraw authority boundaries.