Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,354,908
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 33 of 2,354,908 contributions. Latest 30 days: 0. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 25 Mar 2026.
Ben Wallace (North-East Scotland) (Con): Con Chamber
13 Mar 2003
International Situation
The next few days will be vital to the future of Britain and how it decides to tackle Iraq. The Prime Minister will have to decide whether Britain's interest should come before the interests of the United Nations, China and Russia. This war is not about the diplomatic hoops th...
Ben Wallace (North-East Scotland) (Con): Con Chamber
25 Oct 2001
International Situation
First, I want to pay tribute to the men and women of our armed forces who are right now putting themselves in the front line in the fight against terrorism. All our thoughts are with them and their families, many of whom live in Scotland.Although there is much to commend in th...
Ben Wallace: Con Committee
07 May 2002
Future of Europe <br />(Scottish Parliamentary Forum)
I want to caution that, like it or not, Europe is a politically charged issue. The committee is not big enough to go across the regions. I am a Conservative and Nora Radcliffe is a Liberal Democrat and I am sure that we could raise a number of people to come to see us—our part...
Ben Wallace: Con Committee
05 Nov 2002
Scottish Executive (Scrutiny)
It will take the recommendation of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, which has now been published.
Ben Wallace (North-East Scotland) (Con): Con Chamber
25 Oct 2001
International Situation
Did not the Soviet Union create the mujahedin and the Taliban? The Soviet Union drove in as a military dictator and took over Afghanistan. It caused the split and fragmentation that led to those groups.
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
25 Oct 2001
International Situation
They do not know any boundaries. However, we should be debating what this Parliament can achieve and leave it to others elsewhere to discuss what can be achieved there and the morality of the situation.If the question is asked whether we have cause for the attack, we will answ...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
25 Oct 2001
International Situation
No, I will give way in a minute. Sit down and listen.I have been in war zones and have seen people—from the third world and all over—fleeing in fear. I have seen people in Northern Ireland suffering from fear of terrorism. When I saw the fear in their eyes, frightened because ...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
25 Oct 2001
International Situation
I was going to address the SNP's defence policy, but that would mean that I would have to finish, because that was it.
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
25 Oct 2001
International Situation
I ask members to support the motion.
Ben Wallace (North-East Scotland) (Con): Con Chamber
24 Jan 2002
Anti-nuclear Campaign (Faslane)
I am grateful to the member for giving way.On the point that Tommy Sheridan made about the International Court of Justice ruling, I have examined the appeal court decision that was made last year. It states clearly that the use of such weapons for offensive measures could be c...
Ben Wallace (North-East Scotland) (Con): Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
Does the member believe that there is ever an occasion on which Britain should act unilaterally to protect its interests?
Ben Wallace rose— Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
Will the member give way?
Ben Wallace (North-East Scotland) (Con): Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
I begin by declaring my interest as an active military reservist in the Army.As the only member in the chamber to have been a combat soldier, it falls to me to sum up on behalf of the Conservative party. As a unionist, my position is that the Parliament does not have competenc...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
No. I am afraid that being in the education corps has never qualified as a combative front-line job. Firing chalk in anger is not quite the same thing. I shall press on with my speech.
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
No, no.Of course, it is natural for me as a unionist to say that the Parliament—
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
I never listened to my bosses, I have to say.As unionists, we recognise that the Parliament does not have any competence over foreign policy or defence. Every time that the Parliament echoes what the 72 Scottish MPs at Westminster say, it only undermines public opinion in Scot...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
I will come to the loonies in a minute.
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
Nevertheless, we are forced to respond to the ridiculous and loony motion and amendment from the SNP and the Scottish Socialist Party.
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
I take your guidance, Presiding Officer.Nevertheless, we are forced to respond to the ridiculous motion and amendment from the SNP and the SSP.The collective military experience within the SNP and the SSP is probably no greater than that within the girl guides, and their actua...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
Mr Swinney's motion sets great store by the legal opinion of Matrix Chambers, the lawyers for the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament. According to the lawyers' interpretation of the UN resolution, the UK needs another UN Security Council resolution in order to use force. Could t...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
I am merely trying to point out the motive behind the SNP's motion. It is therefore important that we examine the many contradictions in foreign policy and defence. The situation in Iraq sums up the SNP's position well.Mr Swinney is opposed to military build-up. We have every ...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
No, I will not give way; I have only a minute and half in which to finish.
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
Mr Sheridan's amendment for the SSP proposes civil disobedience. Let us remember that civil disobedience in Iraq does not get anyone very far. In fact, many people who try to express their freedom and their opposition to the current regime in Iraq do not last for long.
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
I do not think that we have the time to go into that question.
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
I will not take lectures from the party whose military adviser proposed chemical weapons to replace Trident.Mr Sheridan's speech discredits the UN. He said that the UN is open to bribes and counts for nothing. In other words, he is saying that he is in favour of unilateral act...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
Sierra Leone, Kosovo, Serbia and Bosnia do not have oil, but we went to war to try to protect their people. That conspiracy theory falls flat on its face.Let us remember the sanctions argument. The members who say that sanctions hurt the poor people who live under those regime...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
16 Jan 2003
International Situation
I do not want war and nor does my party. My party wants to build a consensus in the United Nations, but we will not put that before British interests. We believe that members of Her Majesty's Government in Westminster are the right people to make that decision, and we will con...
Ben Wallace (North-East Scotland) (Con): Con Chamber
13 Mar 2003
International Situation
Will the member give way?
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
13 Mar 2003
International Situation
Resolution 1441 does not supersede, but adds to, resolutions 678 and 686 and resolution 678 authorises the use of force to achieve the aims of previous UN declarations. Does that not allow further action to be taken?
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
13 Mar 2003
International Situation
The Conservatives' position on Iraq has always been that we should act in Britain's interest. If we cannot secure a United Nations resolution, we must decide whether acting in Britain's interest is enough. The Liberal Democrats say that the UN is the only way, but under the le...
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
13 Mar 2003
International Situation
Let us remember that this is about Saddam Hussein; it is about right and wrong and doing what we think is best. We cannot live in the past.
Ben Wallace: Con Chamber
13 Mar 2003
International Situation
We cannot listen to the tantrums of Tommy Sheridan, who, as usual, is making it up as he goes along. In Tommy's world—
← Back to list
Chamber

Plenary, 13 Mar 2003

13 Mar 2003 · S1 · Plenary
Item of business
International Situation
Wallace, Ben Con North East Scotland Watch on SPTV
The next few days will be vital to the future of Britain and how it decides to tackle Iraq. The Prime Minister will have to decide whether Britain's interest should come before the interests of the United Nations, China and Russia. This war is not about the diplomatic hoops that we might or might not have to jump through. It is not about giving a dictator another week, month or 17 or 24 days. It is not about oil conspiracies or anti-Palestinian plots. It is about 17 million people who live under a vicious regime that is comparable to Adolf Hitler's. It is about Britain's interest and the interests of peace and security in the middle east.

The SNP and the Liberal Democrats only want to go down the United Nations route in countering the threat. However, we should consider which countries we would have to go to, cap in hand, to get agreement in the UN Security Council. A recent Amnesty International report stated that hundreds of civilians have been killed, beaten and raped by Government forces in Guinea. The same Amnesty International report stated that human rights abuses recorded in Chechnya, in the Russian Federation, include arbitrary detention, torture and the disappearance of hundreds of people. In Angola, hundreds of unarmed civilians have been indiscriminately and deliberately killed by Government forces. Those countries are all represented on the UN Security Council. Are we saying that we are relying on their support, and that those countries will be in a position to judge right from wrong? I do not think so. Furthermore, despite France's opposition to the war, if any country epitomises unilateral foreign policy, it is France.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Sir David Steel): NPA
Good morning. Our first item of business is a debate on motion S1M-4012, in the name of John Swinney, on the current international situation.I must tell the ...
Mr John Swinney (North Tayside) (SNP): SNP
Two months ago, the Scottish National Party led a debate in this, our national Parliament. That day we set out our "deep and serious concern" that the United...
Johann Lamont (Glasgow Pollok) (Lab): Lab
Does Mr Swinney accept that there are serious people on both sides of the argument and that people in Scotland do not speak with a unanimous voice on the iss...
Mr Swinney: SNP
I could not agree more with Johann Lamont. That is why we are having a three-hour debate in my party's parliamentary time, which will give those of every sha...
Bristow Muldoon (Livingston) (Lab): Lab
On the basis of Mr Swinney's argument today, does he maintain that the SNP was right to oppose the ending of ethnic cleansing in Kosovo in 1999?
Mr Swinney: SNP
In the interests of having a quality public debate about a war that the people of this country will face in the ensuing few days, we should concentrate on th...
Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con): Con
I am obliged to Mr Swinney for giving way. He rightly puts much emphasis on international law. However, does he accept that for every statement on internatio...
Mr Swinney: SNP
If Murdo Fraser will bear with me, I will address that point directly.The United Nations Security Council resolution 1441, which was adopted on 8 November, i...
Members:
Hear, hear.
Mr Swinney: SNP
I am glad to hear that the Liberal Democrats agree with that point. Nowhere in resolution 1441 is there a specific authorisation of force. The resolution cal...
The First Minister (Mr Jack McConnell): Lab
Will Mr Swinney acknowledge that Mr Robert Black has been seriously wrong in the past on issues of concern to this country, including the Lockerbie disaster,...
Mr Swinney: SNP
His running down of distinguished Scottish academics is not exactly a tribute to the First Minister's stance.
The First Minister: Lab
It was wrong to run down Scots law when that law worked in the international interest and in the court in the Netherlands. Mr Black was wrong then and could ...
Mr Swinney: SNP
If that is what the First Minister is reduced to, it says everything about what he has to contribute to the debate.Professor Black has further argued that th...
Johann Lamont: Lab
Does the member therefore agree that the concept of an unreasonable veto exists and does he accept that those of us who are concerned about the Palestinian p...
Mr Swinney: SNP
I ask Johann Lamont merely to go and explain that to the Palestinian people, whose aspirations have been thwarted by the vetoes that I mentioned.Mr Blair sho...
Mr Keith Raffan (Mid Scotland and Fife) (LD): LD
Does Mr Swinney agree that the inspections are achieving containment and that Iraq is currently no threat to us or to its neighbours?
Mr Swinney: SNP
That is a fair point.
Phil Gallie (South of Scotland) (Con): Con
Does the member believe that Iraq would have made the recent concessions if there had not been the pressure of having troops on its borders?
Mr Swinney: SNP
The concessions have been brought about by the pressure of the international community to ensure that Iraq complies with resolutions that have been passed by...
The Presiding Officer: NPA
I thank Mr Swinney for taking less than the allotted time, despite taking interventions.
Mr Jack McConnell (Motherwell and Wishaw) (Lab): Lab
In October 1977, I went on my first demonstration. We were protesting against apartheid and demanding the end of an evil regime. Britain was on the right sid...
Tommy Sheridan (Glasgow) (SSP): SSP
I am glad that the minister protested against apartheid in 1977. Whose side is he on now, however? Is he on the side of Nelson Mandela, who is against this w...
Mr McConnell: Lab
I am on the side of the people of Iraq. I remind Mr Sheridan that, for decades—well over a century—socialists have supported those who are being persecuted a...
Mr Swinney: SNP
I hear what the First Minister says about the UK Government's attitude to a second resolution in the UN. Will the First Minister support military action if t...
Mr McConnell: Lab
I have three things to say in answer to that question. First, it would be wrong, in this country and elsewhere, to comment on hypothetical situations when th...
Andrew Wilson (Central Scotland) (SNP): SNP
Nonsense.
Mr McConnell: Lab
That day, Andrew Wilson said that Alex Salmond was right to describe that action as "unpardonable folly". However, he was not right; he was wrong. That examp...
Mr Swinney: SNP
The First Minister said that he would not comment on hypothetical situations, but then went on to comment on actions that the French Government might take. T...
Mr McConnell: Lab
I will address that point. The amendment that I will move makes the point that action should be authorised by the United Nations.Difficult decisions must be ...