Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,354,908
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 60 of 2,354,908 contributions. Latest 30 days: 0. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 25 Mar 2026.
The Minister for Health and Community Care (Susan Deacon): Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
I am pleased to have the opportunity to make what I believe is a very important announcement. I realise that we are competing with a number of other important events around the country, but I am grateful for the interest that many members have shown in the issue.My statement s...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
Let me correct a point that Mary Scanlon makes. It is important to point out that the Arbuthnott report is not my report. The report was produced by the Arbuthnott committee and an independent review group, following widespread consultation, and the Executive has chosen to acc...
The Minister for Health and Community Care (Susan Deacon): Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I am very pleased that the committee has responded so positively to our request to look at the Arbuthnott review fully and carefully. We consider the review to be an important development. In a moment, I will say more from the Executive's point of view about the background to ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
Is Arbuthnott sufficient to address our priorities? No. Is it an integral part of a much bigger picture? Yes.In terms of some of the detailed methodology that is recommended in Arbuthnott, I do not want to say that everything in the report is perfect. That would negate the pur...
The Minister for Health and Community Care (Susan Deacon): Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
I am grateful for the opportunity to be here to address matters of interest to the committee.I have brought with me some people from the health department. I stress that most of them are here to listen to the views of the committee on the range of issues that will be raised. I...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
The fact that the Arbuthnott report results in each board receiving an allocation that more appropriately reflects its needs means that, in each part of the country, the NHS is resourced according to need, rather than simply population base. It is important that we encourage t...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
Ben Wallace has raised a number of questions that it will be impossible for me to do justice to in the time available. I am, however, pleased that he regards my intentions as "noble"—that is the first time that I have been described in that way in the chamber and, possibly, th...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
I will make a brief comment before John Aldridge comes in with the details. I take this opportunity to reiterate the offer that was extended to the committee of a full briefing on the detail of the final report from officials and/or members of the Arbuthnott group. I know that...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
I am pleased that Kay Ullrich welcomes the Arbuthnott report and our decision to implement it. I am also pleased that she has joined me in acknowledging the link between poverty and ill health. I am always pleased to find areas of common ground where we can move forward togeth...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
As I indicated in my statement, I am pleased that the Health and Community Care Committee played a full part in the discussion on the Arbuthnott report. I invited the committee to take part in the initial consultation exercise. The fact that the work has taken two and a bit ye...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I am glad that the voluntary sector was mentioned in that broader context. All too often, we speak of the NHS and social services but forget that the third important element of care is the services that the voluntary sector can provide. In any discussion about funding, several...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I do not think that it is for me to have a view. It would be quite erroneous for me to prejudge the outcome of a consultation exercise by passing comment on individual elements of the formula. It is my job to say what our broad principles are. It is my job to put in place arra...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
10 May 2000
Budget Process
Effective planning is complex, and takes time. I make no apology for some measures taking a year or two to put in place. That is how we ensure that we put sustainable systems in place.It is often tempting for politicians—and certainly for ministers and Government—to put quick ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
The figure of 2.2 per cent, which is the total of what is being redistributed, is sometimes slightly misleading, as we are talking about 2.2 per cent of an overall total of some £4.5 billion, which is not an insignificant sum. When the Arbuthnott formula is applied, it will tr...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
With the greatest respect, I point to the distinction that I made in response to the previous question between shifts, relative shares and the amount of resource allocated. When the Arbuthnott review group compiled the formula, it considered the different components of each he...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
I confirm again that the island health boards, like other health boards, are receiving substantial real-terms increases in spend. That enables me to give you the assurance that you seek. I am, of course, aware of the specific needs not only of island health board areas but of ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
Transparency is crucial. I know that the committee commented on that point in some detail and I am pleased that the Arbuthnott review group took on board the committee's comments. The net result is a final report and a summary report that are more accessible to a range of audi...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
I doubt whether many, if any, Government policies have been as closely reviewed as the Arbuthnott proposals. As the committee knows from the range of evidence and witnesses that it heard, the input was extensive. I therefore believe that the report has already been subject to ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
15 Jun 2000
Question Time · National Health Service (Resources)
I am delighted to give Margaret Smith—and, indeed, the whole chamber—the information that I was asked for when I recently attended the Health and Community Care Committee. The Arbuthnott review will put in place a fairer system of allocating some £5 billion of national health ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
The short answer to John McAllion's question is yes, that was considered in the course of the Arbuthnott review. The Scottish Advisory Committee on Drug Misuse is considering how that work can be progressed more effectively.I draw members' attention to part of the financial st...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
15 Mar 2001
Question Time · Health Boards and Trusts (Arbuthnott formula)
I am bound to say, for no reason other than the factual one, that I regret that once again Mary Scanlon is somewhat confused about the facts. It is worth pointing out that Highland Health Board, under the Arbuthnott provision, is receiving a 9.75 per cent increase in funding n...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
31 May 2001
Question Time · National Health Service (Funding)
I do not agree with Mr Rumbles's statement. We should remember that the Arbuthnott formula is a radical and, rightly, distinctively Scottish measure, which was designed to put in place a better, fairer funding formula for the national health service in Scotland. For the first ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
Your question raises a number of points. The short answer is yes, although I will define that more fully. A balance has to be struck, or perhaps we need to decide what we want from such a review. There is a difference between transparency and simplicity. It would be possible t...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
Likewise. We could not have provided more information. The right amount of complexity and—dare I say—sophistication was used to come up with an equitable evidence-based formula. We produced the information in a format that the public was able to engage with. I am pleased that ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
Yes.
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I hope that I can be forgiven, convener, for repeating one or two points that I made earlier, although I will try to add other information. I wish to make this crystal clear again—it has been debated in the Parliament—that we have now entered a period of record investment in t...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
May I reiterate the point that I made earlier? We must also consider how we spend the money. Already, £100 million has been saved through the reorganisation of the NHS—by the abolition of the internal market—and put into patient care. Action has been taken to examine how we pr...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I am bound to say that my answer to that question is very similar to my answers to previous questions. I think that this report represents a significant step towards addressing and meeting need. The fact that this Government is willing to say that health inequalities exist and...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
"Halt" and "do anything" are two different things. I think that the report will help to address the problem that you have identified. I have already said that it will not, in itself, halt the trend.
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
You have made some specific points, but I will say that, in general, you and other members have illustrated precisely the sorts of areas in which we welcome input from others, not least from the committee.We must recognise that this is just one piece of the jigsaw. I stress th...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
On ensuring that resources are spent to meet need, I recognise—as I said at the very beginning—that the scope of the review is solely to consider how the overall cake is divided up, as opposed to how health boards spend money locally or, as members have mentioned, how other ag...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
Those are important questions. In the report, Sir John suggested the idea of a standing committee that could monitor the formula. We are open to the idea that the formula and its effects should be effectively monitored. Moreover, there is a need to adjust it to take account of...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
For the proportion of the health service spend that this formula covers, I would not be inclined to override the application of that formula. The point of adopting a formula-based approach is to have a transparent system so that all those affected can see the basis on which de...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I will do my best to be as succinct as I can. We could sit here until this time next week and still be having healthy debate.
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I will take Duncan Hamilton's points first. If he, or any other member of the committee, has substantive reservations about any element of the report, its recommendations or the formula, then now is the time to record them. That is why we are having a four-month consultation p...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I think there were another three points that Mary Scanlon raised. I do not know whether you want me to say more, convener?
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
We have to be very careful here. I do not have the exact figures to hand, but it is true to say that there are transfers of patients across different parts of Scotland and across different parts of the United Kingdom, which is where we get benefits from working on a co-operati...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I had almost forgotten about the shellfish.I brought Dr Kevin Woods with me but, as is my wont, I have not given him a chance to say anything. It might be helpful to ask him about the question about the quality of data.
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I return now to the other questions that were raised. If I have correctly understood the question about the wider health improvement and public health dimension, the short answer is that it cannot be an either/or. We cannot focus on just one area and make funding changes furth...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I will let Dr Woods explain a wee bit about that element of the formula. Your question touches on issues that are in some respects similar to the questions on the connections with social services and community care. We recognise that health promotion activities are not linked ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
27 Oct 1999
Arbuthnott Report
I reiterate that we would welcome the committee drawing together the comments that it has received as part of the submission so that we can consider them. On inequalities, I suspect that Sir John would have said, as I have, and as he has said to me, that the inequalities eleme...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
Deprivation and the wider agenda of social justice have been addressed since the Executive came into office last year. We have worked hard to put tackling health inequalities at the heart of our policy agenda. I shall give a couple of examples of that. We have targeted the all...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
Those are precisely the sorts of issues that are being addressed in the context of the development of the Scottish health plan, which will provide the strategic framework within which the NHS in Scotland will be required to operate from April next year and which will set out c...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
Richard Simpson identifies that healthy living centres have been developed in different parts of the country with funding support from the new opportunities fund. We regard them as an integral and important part of work in this area. The development of healthy living centres w...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
Absolutely.
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
I repeat my earlier point: I am bound to say that Mary Scanlon's points are inaccurate, in the sense that—
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
Convener, Mary Scanlon raised a number of detailed points. Would it be helpful if the director of finance commented on them?
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
As I have indicated, I do not think that there is anything seriously wrong with the formula and I am not aware that anyone else, including those who were in the chamber when I made the announcement, has said that there is anything seriously wrong with it. I reiterate my commit...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
I note Richard Simpson's point. However, I must point out again that the report contains significant methodology and detail. I stress that we want to ensure that the issue is addressed and I hope that we can develop effective mechanisms in order to achieve that. The matter is ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
25 Oct 2000
Arbuthnott Report
We want to ensure that effective review mechanisms are in place. Our entire approach must be as open, transparent and robust as possible. I would be happy to come back to the committee as we develop the means of doing that.
Susan Deacon: Lab Committee
16 May 2001
Budget Process 2002-03
I am making an important point. The initial question was about achieving health improvement targets for cancer and coronary heart disease. We will not achieve our health targets simply by doing more and more in the NHS to treat ill health; we will achieve those targets by tack...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
09 Dec 1999
Question Time · Rural General Practitioners
Mr Hamilton does a great disservice to the Parliament and to the issues that he raises. His question serves to indicate what a mass of hyperbole he is becoming. Not for the first time, he uses the word crisis in the same sentence as a reference to the health service completely...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
16 Dec 1999
Health Service
Normally I never intervene in debates because, as a minister, I have an opportunity to comment elsewhere. However, I ask Mr Hamilton to correct the record. Will he confirm to the chamber that at no time did I comment to the press on the Health and Community Care Committee's re...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
07 Sep 2000
Question Time · National Health Service
It is interesting that many of the same members who look to the Executive to achieve change, set targets and drive forward improvements in waiting times seem to have difficulties when we put in place measures to ensure that those steps are taken in every part of the country. O...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
I shall address Margaret Smith's comments on the Health and Community Care Committee first. Like her, I do not think that something that is as positive and generally welcomed as my announcement should have a sour note attached to it. I stress the full part that the Health and ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
It is significant that we have taken a major step forward nationally in recognising that the needs of rural and remote communities are different. That is reflected in the way that shares have been drawn up, so that an area such as the Highlands has a share of resources that re...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
I disagree with Richard Lochhead's assertion. The essence of the exercise is to put in place a fair and transparent arrangement for allocating shares of resources. Richard Lochhead used the word "perception". Allocations in the formula are based not on perceptions but on hard ...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
As I indicated in the statement, the methods of monitoring and performance management of the NHS in Scotland are under review. There is widespread recognition in the Executive and the NHS that there must be greater clarification of roles and responsibilities throughout the ser...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
I am sure that Robert Brown will join me in welcoming the fact that the GGHB will receive £60.6 million more next year than it will this year. It will be for the GGHB, in the course of its current review of acute services, to consider how best to put those resources to work an...
Susan Deacon: Lab Chamber
21 Sep 2000
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
Again, I am pleased to point out an increase: Ayrshire and Arran will receive a 7.5 per cent increase in its budget next year. Margaret Jamieson has touched on a point that other members have mentioned. Communities and the needs and health of those communities vary greatly in ...
← Back to list
Chamber

Plenary, 21 Sep 2000

21 Sep 2000 · S1 · Plenary
Item of business
Arbuthnott Report<br />(NHS Resources)
Deacon, Susan Lab Edinburgh East and Musselburgh Watch on SPTV
I am pleased to have the opportunity to make what I believe is a very important announcement. I realise that we are competing with a number of other important events around the country, but I am grateful for the interest that many members have shown in the issue.

My statement sets out the Executive's plans for the implementation of "Fair Shares for All", the national review of resource allocation for the national health service in Scotland, which is perhaps better known as the Arbuthnott report. On 7 September the final report was published and copies were circulated to all MSPs, so I hope that members will have had the opportunity to consider it.

The Executive is committed to working to improve the lives of the Scottish people—in short, to making a difference. At the heart of our agenda is a determination to improve health, tackle deprivation, promote social justice and improve public services. Yesterday, Jack McConnell demonstrated how the Executive's resources as a whole were being used to achieve those aims. Today, I will set out how we will put record health spending to work to deliver on them.

We have embarked on a major programme of NHS modernisation, which is based on investment and reform. A crucial part of our programme for the NHS is to ensure that resources go where they are most needed.

The Conservative Governments of the 1980s and 1990s refused to acknowledge the link between poverty and ill health. Their legacy to the NHS and the health of the Scottish people was a widening of the gap between the rich and the poor and increasing inequalities in health. Since 1997, the Labour Government and now the Labour-Liberal Democrat devolved Administration have started to turn that position around. We recognise the link between poverty and ill health and are acting on that recognition. We have abolished the Tory internal market in the NHS. We are putting the NHS together again and building a new partnership with staff and patients. Furthermore, we are backing those commitments with record resources. We know that there is a long way to go to undo the damage of the Tory years, but we have made an important start.

We believe that all the people of Scotland should have access to high-quality modern health services, that access should be equitable and that services should meet local needs. We recognise that poor living conditions, deprivation and living remotely all have an impact on the design, delivery and cost of health care provision. We are determined to ensure that resources are allocated fairly to meet those needs. That is why we want a fairer and better way of distributing the NHS's huge budget in line with need and why the Arbuthnott report is so important.

The formula that is used to allocate NHS resources across Scotland's 15 health boards—the Scottish health authority revenue equalisation formula, or SHARE formula—has been in place since 1977. As that formula is based primarily on population and death rates, it takes only limited account of needs that are reflected in deprivation and remoteness. When he was health minister in the UK Government, Sam Galbraith recognised that the formula needed to be revised. In December 1997 he set up the review group that was chaired by Professor Sir John Arbuthnott.

The first report of that group was published in July 1999. It was widely recognised as innovative and groundbreaking. Extensive consultation and discussion took place following the publication of the first report and I am grateful to all those who contributed to that consultation process—especially the Health and Community Care Committee.

The expert group considered carefully the points that were raised during the consultation and revised its work accordingly. Two weeks ago, Sir John Arbuthnott's final report was published. I was delighted by the positive response that it received. His committee's recommendations are an enormous improvement on the SHARE formula. It is a tribute to the hard and thorough work of Sir John and his team that the report has been so widely praised both in and outwith Scotland. I would like to record my appreciation to the group for its work and I am sure that other members will join me in doing so.

I have on many occasions indicated to the chamber, to the Health and Community Care Committee and more widely my desire to proceed with early implementation of a revised funding formula. Today I am pleased to be able to set out how and when we will do that.

The Arbuthnott recommendations cover three major groups of activity in the NHS in Scotland. Hospital and community services and general practitioner prescribing currently make up the bulk of the budgets that are allocated to health boards each year. The report recommends that the shares of the resources that go to different health boards must change to reflect better the health boards' relative needs. In particular, a larger share of resources needs to go to areas such as greater Glasgow that suffer from high levels of deprivation, and areas such as the Highlands that must meet additional costs because of their remoteness.

My aim is to implement the recommendations as quickly as is practicable. At the same time, I will fulfil the commitment that I gave last year—and which I have repeated—that every health board will continue to receive real-terms growth in its budget every year for the lifetime of this Administration. It is my aim that all health boards reach their Arbuthnott share within five or six years.

I am pleased to announce that £12 million extra will be allocated to health boards in this financial year to kick-start the process of implementation. Some £6 million of that money will be distributed to every health board in line with its fair share according to the Arbuthnott report. The other £6 million will be distributed to the health boards that the Arbuthnott report says need a larger share than they have.

Furthermore—as Jack McConnell announced yesterday—next year £400 million more cash will be available for health spending in Scotland than was available this year. As a result, I can also announce that in the general hospital and community health and prescribing allocations for next year, every health board will receive at least a 5.5 per cent cash increase—more than twice the rate of inflation. On average, health boards will receive 6.5 per cent more. Health boards that, based on the Arbuthnott review, need a larger share will get significantly more. For example, Greater Glasgow Health Board will receive 7.7 per cent, which will give it a hospital and community health and prescribing budget of £846 million. Those increases are in addition to the £12 million extra for this year that I have just announced. Details of the allocations to each health board are being issued today and a copy will be placed in the Scottish Parliament information centre.

Let me make it clear that health boards will decide the details of how to spend the money—that is their job. However, in doing so, they will rightly be expected to deliver on local and national priorities such as tackling waiting, reducing health inequalities and improving the experience of being a patient.

As I set out to Parliament in July's debate on NHS modernisation, we are developing a national strategic framework for the NHS in Scotland that will reflect the people's priorities and will ensure that record NHS investment is translated into record improvements for patients. Our Scottish health plan will be published in November and will include revised arrangements for governance and performance management in the NHS in Scotland. That will mean that the NHS will know what is expected of it and that it will be held to account for its actions and decisions, not only on inputs but—crucially—on results.

The Arbuthnott report recommended that we should take more time to implement its recommendations on general medical services. I accept that recommendation. It is particularly important to get that right because primary care is the key to developing services that are focused on patients and, in particular, to delivering better and more joined-up care for older people. I will announce more on that in a few weeks. I will discuss with the NHS how best to implement fully that part of the report's recommendations.

Those recommendations must also be put into effect to complement our ambitious programme of development of primary care services across Scotland, which will ensure that everyone has access to the GP and primary care services that they need. Meanwhile, I propose to start by skewing the increases of the part of the general medical services allocation that covers GPs' premises and information technology equipment to ensure that the health boards that need a larger share of that money will begin to move in the right direction.

It is vital that the new funding formula remains up to date and able to take account of additional information as it becomes available. On the other hand, it would be disruptive to make major changes to the formula too frequently. In line with the recommendation of Sir John Arbuthnott's group, I intend, therefore, to keep the formula under review and we will undertake a major updating of the data that underpin the formula every five years or so.

Finally, I will say something about the rest of the health budget. The allocations that I am announcing today are a big part of the health budget. The sum that is covered by the formula-based allocation represents more than £4.4 billion of a total cash health budget for next year of £5.8 billion. I am determined that that entire budget will be used to best effect to meet the health needs of the Scottish people. The Scottish health plan that I will publish later this year will give clear direction on how health and health-related services will develop. It will show how we will assess and manage performance and how the unprecedented resources that we are investing will be translated into real benefits for the people of Scotland.

I believe that, by beginning today the implementation of the Arbuthnott review—by putting in place a better, fairer funding formula that is linked to need—we are laying one of the foundation stones for the NHS in Scotland in the 21st century. It is a distinctive Scottish solution that will meet distinctive Scottish needs. I am sure that Parliament will welcome it.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Sir David Steel): NPA
Good morning. Our first item of business is a statement by Susan Deacon on the Arbuthnott resource allocation. There will be questions at the end of the stat...
The Minister for Health and Community Care (Susan Deacon): Lab
I am pleased to have the opportunity to make what I believe is a very important announcement. I realise that we are competing with a number of other importan...
The Presiding Officer: NPA
Many members want to ask questions, but I remind everyone that we are about to embark on a health debate in which, again, many members wish to speak. Let us ...
Kay Ullrich (West of Scotland) (SNP): SNP
I thank the minister for her statement and welcome today's announcement. At long last, after 20 years of Government inaction, we have an acknowledgement of t...
Susan Deacon: Lab
I am pleased that Kay Ullrich welcomes the Arbuthnott report and our decision to implement it. I am also pleased that she has joined me in acknowledging the ...
Mary Scanlon (Highlands and Islands) (Con): Con
I also welcome today's statement, but it is unfortunate that the minister did not have the courtesy and good will to bring the final report before the Health...
Susan Deacon: Lab
As I indicated in my statement, I am pleased that the Health and Community Care Committee played a full part in the discussion on the Arbuthnott report. I in...
Mrs Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD
I welcome the review. The debate that we will have later this morning will show clearly the need for the review and for a move away from the SHARE formula th...
The Presiding Officer: NPA
Can we have a question at some point?
Mrs Smith: LD
What is planned for the update? How will that fit into the on-going budgeting procedure? Will there be a technical report that will show health boards and ot...
Susan Deacon: Lab
I shall address Margaret Smith's comments on the Health and Community Care Committee first. Like her, I do not think that something that is as positive and g...
The Presiding Officer: NPA
I can call only a small proportion of members who want to ask questions, so I shall give priority to those who are not seeking to speak in the later debate.
Rhoda Grant (Highlands and Islands) (Lab): Lab
I also welcome the minister's announcement. She said that the measures that have been announced should tackle inequalities. Can she confirm that the funding ...
Susan Deacon: Lab
It is significant that we have taken a major step forward nationally in recognising that the needs of rural and remote communities are different. That is ref...
Ben Wallace (North-East Scotland) (Con): Con
On a point of order. The statement and the report are important. The report is complex and members of the Health and Community Care Committee have spent a co...
The Presiding Officer: NPA
That is at my discretion. The problem is that many members want to speak in the health debate, but if the statement runs beyond 10.00 am, some will be unable...
Richard Lochhead (North-East Scotland) (SNP): SNP
In Grampian there is a perception that the poverty indicators that underpin the funding distribution formula in the Arbuthnott report discriminate against th...
Susan Deacon: Lab
I disagree with Richard Lochhead's assertion. The essence of the exercise is to put in place a fair and transparent arrangement for allocating shares of reso...
Maureen Macmillan (Highlands and Islands) (Lab): Lab
I thank the minister for her statement. There is a perception in the more remote rural areas that those areas are threatened with loss of services, but I wel...
Susan Deacon: Lab
As I indicated in the statement, the methods of monitoring and performance management of the NHS in Scotland are under review. There is widespread recognitio...
Robert Brown (Glasgow) (LD): LD
I welcome the additional resources that will be brought to deprived areas by the Arbuthnott recommendations. Does the minister accept that access to high-qua...
Susan Deacon: Lab
I am sure that Robert Brown will join me in welcoming the fact that the GGHB will receive £60.6 million more next year than it will this year. It will be for...
Margaret Jamieson (Kilmarnock and Loudoun) (Lab): Lab
I welcome the minister's statement. What assurances can she give that the principles in the Arbuthnott report will be applied in health board areas such as A...
Susan Deacon: Lab
Again, I am pleased to point out an increase: Ayrshire and Arran will receive a 7.5 per cent increase in its budget next year. Margaret Jamieson has touched ...
Ben Wallace: Con
I welcome the minister's statement and acknowledge the noble aims of the report. However, the report is good only as long as the equations and statistics tha...
The Presiding Officer: NPA
Do not ask many, please—just one or two.
Ben Wallace: Con
The minister talked about performance-related pay for management in health boards, which is a good idea. However—and this question was asked a number of time...
Richard Lochhead: SNP
This is a speech.
Ben Wallace: Con
I did not hear who said that, but this is not a speech.Will the minister assist members on a technical point? The Arbuthnott report is complicated, so will t...
Susan Deacon: Lab
Ben Wallace has raised a number of questions that it will be impossible for me to do justice to in the time available. I am, however, pleased that he regards...