Committee
Audit Committee, 19 Dec 2006
19 Dec 2006 · S2 · Audit Committee
Item of business
“Relocation of Scottish Executive departments, agencies and NDPBs”
We understand the difficulties of trying to assess what may or may not be in ministers' minds.I will take you back into your comfort zone of facts and numbers, which might be our comfort zone as well. How many agencies or organisations—although I presume that we are happy to use the generic term "agencies"—have been identified for relocation review since the policy was adopted in 1999? How many posts are covered by those agencies? For how many agencies and posts has a relocation decision been taken?
In the same item of business
The Convener:
Ind
Under item 5, we will take evidence for our inquiry into the relocation of Scottish Executive departments, agencies and non-departmental public bodies. I wel...
Sir John Elvidge (Scottish Executive Permanent Secretary):
I will be brief, because I know that the committee's time is constrained.In my written submission of 13 November, I set out the statutory requirements under ...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
If I may speak on behalf of the committee, I thank you for your opening remarks and for the other documentation that you mentioned. I suggest, however, that ...
Sir John Elvidge:
The policy's primary objective is to achieve two benefits from relocation: to have a positive impact on the local economy of the area to which relocation tak...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
I am grateful for that summary and will explore each of those points in turn. You identified the first aim as being to have a positive impact on the area to ...
Sir John Elvidge:
The independent advice that we have is that authoritative evaluation of the impact of such changes on local economies cannot be made in the short term and th...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
You said that the second aim was to bring services closer to the public that they serve. How successful has the policy been in achieving that objective? Will...
Sir John Elvidge:
I am not sure that measurement is likely to be at the heart of our approach in that area. You are right to say that, in practice, many of the bodies that hav...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
I will resist the temptation to pursue that last point. I have heard a robust counter-argument that it sends the wrong message about SNH's role, but that may...
Sir John Elvidge:
Without evaluation evidence, it is difficult for me to assess that. However, at the moment, there are no contra-indications to the general analysis that econ...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
The Executive has said clearly that it has not set any targets. In the most recent update report submitted to the Finance Committee and circulated to this co...
Sir John Elvidge:
I will have to state the conventional reservation: the decision on whether to set targets is a ministerial one, and I am always cautious about advancing expl...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
We understand the difficulties of trying to assess what may or may not be in ministers' minds.I will take you back into your comfort zone of facts and number...
Sir John Elvidge:
I am sure that I can answer those questions, although doing so may require a certain amount of scrabbling around among my bits of paper.We have reviewed 38 o...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
I am not quick enough at arithmetic to confirm that calculation, nor to convert it into percentages. Perhaps you can give me percentage figures. Nevertheless...
Sir John Elvidge:
Yes. There is no doubt about that.
Susan Deacon:
Lab
Can you convert that into percentages?
Sir John Elvidge:
I can have a go. Around 4 per cent of posts have remained in Edinburgh, therefore around 96 per cent of posts have either relocated or been identified for re...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
What proportion of that 96 per cent have been relocated to Glasgow?
Sir John Elvidge:
Fifty-four per cent.
Susan Deacon:
Lab
Does it not concern you that a policy that is supposed to deliver economic and wider benefits to all parts of Scotland—successive ministers have consistently...
Sir John Elvidge:
I am not sure that it is my place to be concerned about the distribution of the posts. The locating of posts in a conurbation that contains a number of areas...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
I appreciate that. However, in the interests of good policy development and implementation, ought there not to be a wider strategic overview of the policy to...
Sir John Elvidge:
The conclusion of the draft evaluation report—that there is scope for relating the policy better to the range of other policies with similar objectives in re...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
I want to return to a few of the numbers that you mentioned earlier. I shall round up for ease of reference for the purposes of the discussion but, if I capt...
Sir John Elvidge:
That is a difficult question. The Scottish ministers were at the forefront of an emerging trend in the UK and internationally in favouring the policy. The UK...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
In essence, you say that there is no current end point, but that consideration may be given to one in the future. I guess that we cannot speculate on the mat...
Sir John Elvidge:
There are two angles of approach to that question. One is to say that there will clearly come a point in time when every organisation that naturally falls wi...
Susan Deacon:
Lab
I am conscious that I must cover several other areas, so I will resist the temptation to probe that issue further. Other colleagues might wish to pursue it.W...
Sir John Elvidge:
There is no need for me to have a view on that, because ministers already do. Their view is that yes, some functions should not be distanced from the seat of...