Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,354,908
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 60 of 2,354,908 contributions. Latest 30 days: 0. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 25 Mar 2026.
Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD): LD Chamber
14 Dec 2006
Carbon Trust
I thank members for their support of the motion and the Carbon Trust for the excellent briefing that it circulated to members before the debate. Last but not least, I give special thanks to colleagues who have stayed half an hour later than usual after a busy parliamentary wee...
Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD) rose— LD Chamber
24 Jan 2007
Scottish Parliament (Disqualification) Order 2007 (Draft)
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
21 Apr 2004
Common Agricultural Policy Reform Inquiry
For how long are we committed to having the envelope? Will it be in place until 2007 if we introduce it?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Oct 2006
Budget Process 2007-08
I am interested in the target of processing 72 per cent of licence applications within statutory time limits. An explanation has been given, but I am still slightly bothered by the matter. A statutory time limit should mean exactly that. Is there scope for considering when you...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Oct 2006
Budget Process 2007-08
I just worry about the ripple effects on people who are waiting for licence applications to be determined. However, those people can appeal.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Oct 2006
Budget Process 2007-08
Do the statutory time limits for different licences perhaps need to be made more pragmatic and workable?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Oct 2006
Budget Process 2007-08
The measure becomes more reasonable once we dig underneath it.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Oct 2006
Budget Process 2007-08
Would it require primary legislation at Westminster?
Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD): LD Committee
09 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
I am the Liberal Democrat MSP for Gordon.
Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD): LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
I have a question specifically for the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and a more general question for all our witnesses. SEPA's written submission states that,"in the UK, it is probably illegal, under existing legislation, to bury carbon dioxide from power generation p...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
I was slightly taken aback when I read that—given that we are considering carbon sequestration as a useful way forward.Our three witnesses represent organisations with varying roles in ownership, regulation and enforcement. We would find it helpful if you could each say someth...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
I want to follow that argument for a bit. It is like belling the cat; people say we should simplify and streamline all the legislation that governs activity in the marine environment. How far is that possible or even desirable? Last week, someone made the very pertinent remark...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
That is exactly what the worldwide web is intended for. I am sorry that I am hogging the questioning a bit.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
My final question follows on from that. Do you see any gaps in the baseline data that we have, which we should try to fill? If so, how should we do that?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
I ask Graham U'ren to expand on the practicalities of that, as he sees them. I suppose that the model is the old structure plan and local plan, but in this case the top level would be UK-wide and the lower levels would be Scotland-wide and local. Do you think that that would w...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
As you say, that is a challenge.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
What is the timescale for the move to the new system? Will it have the capacity to cope with demand, given that there are currently 30 applications a month?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
I presume that the optimum time for planting is the end of the year. Will a season be missed, or is that a silly question?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
However, if there is a delay, we might end up actually skipping a year.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
It is entirely proper that the regulations are offered as a coherent whole, because they were consulted on. We must move forward on ship-to-ship oil transfers, but the Executive and the Parliament do business by properly considering consultation responses. It is entirely prope...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
17 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
I had not spotted the spelling mistake. I welcome the regulations and I think that we should comment on the enormous amount of work that the minister and officials in the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department have done to achieve this outcome. The work wa...
Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD): LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Aquaculture and Fisheries (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Is the Norwegian access code advisory or is it statutorily underpinned?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Aquaculture and Fisheries (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Norway seems to deal with the issue just by giving advice to anglers.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
How many multiple-trawl boats are there? There seems to be a very small number; there may be only three and they may have been given a derogation to undertake research.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
We do not know what the small number is. If there are only three vessels and they have been given a derogation to do research, that would alter the argument.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
We welcome the derogations that have been won and will watch with interest what happens with the angles of ramps, because it has not been demonstrated that that is necessarily an effective animal welfare measure, although it is going to be imposed in time.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
The Executive may decide to give further consideration to the matter. Perhaps it will press for a derogation on that issue, too. The Executive has done well. I welcome the derogations that it has won.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
We have heard conflicting evidence on marine spatial planning. On the one hand, we have heard about limited competition between uses outside the main firths and that the main impacts on the marine environment occur in the coastal zone, and on the other hand we have heard that ...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
That is part of the same area.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
I notice that Shetland is doing a lot of digital mapping. Are you learning lessons about the practicalities of doing that that you could share with other people? Mapping is not as simple as it sounds, as there are questions to do with what you put in, what you leave out and ho...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
There are two streams that we should be examining with regard to research. Not only the collecting but the handling of information is important, because unless it is useful, what is the point of having it?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
Can we approach the argument about complexity from a different angle and get the benefit of your experience? You all do things in the marine environment. We are told that the framework that covers the marine environment is enormously complex and that, if someone wants to do so...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
It is quite an opportune moment to come to me, because I want to widen the discussion about how data and information are collected and used. What is the Executive doing to identify gaps in our knowledge and information? For example, one key data gap that has been mentioned is ...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
I will ask a parallel question. How you handle all the information, store it, map it and co-ordinate it is a science in itself. Is any research taking place on information handling and the specifics, such as how to produce maps? That is also a skilled area. Has any research be...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
24 Jan 2007
Marine Environment Inquiry
I will bring the discussion down to a much more specific and local level. Shetland has been producing maps of areas around the Shetland Isles. Are you looking at the lessons that have been learned about the practicalities of putting information on maps? Is more work needed on ...
Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD): LD Committee
31 Jan 2007
Aquaculture and Fisheries (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
The minister's opening statement was helpful in setting out what is proposed and why, and the genesis of the proposal. I have thought long and hard about the representations that pike fishermen have made to us and I accept completely that responsible pike anglers would use as ...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
31 Jan 2007
Aquaculture and Fisheries (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I accept every bracket and subsection.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
31 Jan 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
I want to come back to the points that John Swinney just made so eloquently about the SNH consultation. To me, it was thorough, wide ranging and inclusive, and it thrashed out all the questions about where the boundary should be and whether certain places should be in or out. ...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
31 Jan 2007
Subordinate Legislation
I thought that the scientific investigation was needed to ascertain what period is needed for recovery from the damage that multiple gear has caused, not to ascertain whether the use of multiple gear aids conservation.
Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD): LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
Paragraph 3.2 of the Blair Atholl area tourism association submission talks about the boundaries and seems to suggest extending the boundary further than the bill suggests. Is that a misapprehension?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
I have a general question for the whole panel. There have been hints that the Executive might consider the boundaries when it comes to the five-year review. Why do you think that it would be better to support the bill than to wait for a chance of changing things during the rev...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
One of the arguments against extending the boundary is that an increased cost would be incurred. You may have seen the figures that the Executive has provided. What do you think it would cost to incorporate an extra bit of land, including Blair Atholl, into the national park? ...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
If we accept, hypothetically, that the boundary will change either now as a result of John Swinney's bill or later as a result of the quinquennial review, would it be preferable to revisit at this point all that you are doing now or to revisit when you are further ahead? If th...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
I am not talking about the money, but about the practicalities.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
You seem to be saying that if we do not move the boundary now, it would not be sensible to do so for at least another five years.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
I get the point that the tentative nomination would be made on the ground of geology rather than natural history. Would it be a UK decision or an international decision?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
It has come to that conclusion, but does that have anything to do with the people who decide which sites get world heritage status? Has the UK Government just decided to go for one category and is the other category still open to it?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
Is the wider category still open? Has the decision been made to go for category A because category B is no longer available, or are both categories available?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
That was part of a wider picture than the UK?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
Thank you. I just wanted to clarify that.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
It might be appropriate to finish with a general question. Would including the area to the south in the national park change the balance of any of your policies and plans for the existing national park? Would it turn the existing park into something very different?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
05 Feb 2007
Cairngorms National Park Boundary Bill: Stage 1
Would this proposal change any of the parameters of your activity? For example, would it affect the balance of the different types of provision in the park?
Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD): LD Committee
07 Feb 2007
Petitions
I want to pursue Mark Ruskell's line of inquiry about the environmental impact assessment, which I gather Aquatera was contracted to prepare for the developer. Aquatera is described as a Scottish environmental consultancy company, which is a very wide description. Can anyone g...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
07 Feb 2007
Petitions
Is it a specialist company? I know nothing about it, so I wondered whether anyone could enlighten us.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
07 Feb 2007
Petitions
I suppose that the independent check was running the proposals past SNH. It sounds as though SNH was not particularly happy with the environmental impact assessment. Is that assessment deficient?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
07 Feb 2007
Petitions
I saw in the documents that modelling of what would happen if there was an oil spillage is based on a volume of 12m3. I read elsewhere said that the oil is pumped at 1 tonne per second. How much does 1m3 of oil weigh?
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
07 Feb 2007
Petitions
So we are talking about something that would take a few seconds to spill, and that is what we have modelled the spillage on. I just wondered if anybody had challenged the oil spill contingency plan on that basis.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
07 Feb 2007
Petitions
One of the earlier witnesses pointed out the difference between certain types of crude oil and said that the oil in question is particularly heavy and polluting.
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
07 Feb 2007
Petitions
I do not know whether this is a fair question to ask because it is about legal competence. Would it be competent to include in the oil spill contingency plan a clean-up duty? I was rather surprised to hear that local authorities do not have a statutory responsibility in that r...
Nora Radcliffe: LD Committee
07 Feb 2007
Petitions
The fact that you will have done any clean-up voluntarily may make your grounds for recovering compensation rather shaky.The MCA is considering secondary legislation on non-emergency ship-to-ship transfers within the 12 nautical mile zone, but outwith harbour authority areas. ...
← Back to list
Chamber

Plenary, 14 Dec 2006

14 Dec 2006 · S2 · Plenary
Item of business
Carbon Trust
I thank members for their support of the motion and the Carbon Trust for the excellent briefing that it circulated to members before the debate. Last but not least, I give special thanks to colleagues who have stayed half an hour later than usual after a busy parliamentary week to speak in the debate.

The scientific community agrees that climate change is happening, that it is happening because of man's activities and that it is probably still possible to avert potential catastrophe by modifying our activities. The urgency of the message that we must modify our activities has been reinforced this week by the report that polar ice is not refreezing after the summer melt; by the fact that, closer to home, people had to flee their homes yesterday because of flooding; and by the 14 flood alerts that were in operation throughout Scotland this morning. That follows the warnings in the Stern report that the cost of doing nothing will be far greater than the cost of taking action now and that the longer we leave it, the more costly it will be.

When that message prompts the business community to ask, "What can we do?" the Carbon Trust comes into its own. The Carbon Trust is an independent company that was established by the Government. It helps the United Kingdom to meet its climate change obligations by helping businesses to understand the importance of lowering their carbon emissions and by offering practical advice on how to do that. Businesses are responsible for about half of all the UK's carbon emissions, so it is important that they get the message, advice and help.

The Carbon Trust has developed a comprehensive range of carbon management activities for large organisations that wish to manage and reduce their carbon emissions while growing profitably. Two large paper mills in the north-east are benefiting from that. Aberdeen City Council pioneered, and Aberdeenshire Council is using, the local authority carbon management programme, which has been adapted for the public sector and provides councils with technical and change management support and guidance to help them to realise carbon emission savings.

The Carbon Trust has a carbon management product that is tailored to the needs of the higher education sector, and the trust's national health service carbon management programme is designed specifically for NHS trusts. The programme provides staff with support in and guidance on integrating good carbon management into their organisation's infrastructure and day-to-day operations at all levels. I am delighted that my local health board, NHS Grampian, is working with the Carbon Trust in the NHS carbon management programme. It is the only NHS Scotland board that is involved in the programme, and it is one of only 10 that are taking part in the UK. The programme runs until the end of March 2007, and goes beyond energy savings and awareness. It examines issues such as procurement, planning, travel and transportation, business strategies and capital programmes. NHS Grampian could significantly reduce, in a sustainable way, its carbon output and energy-related costs. By the end of March 2007, it will have developed a strategic implementation plan for carbon reduction targets and cost reductions over the short, medium and long term.

What is interesting and attractive about the Carbon Trust's approach is that modifying our activities to combat climate change does not require a hair shirt. Businesses and organisations continue to function, to produce and to provide services, but they do so with an awareness of the carbon cost, as well as the monetary cost, of their activity. By sensible planning and the elimination of waste, they save not only carbon emissions but money.

Buildings are responsible for approximately 40 per cent of the UK's carbon emissions, with non-residential buildings being responsible for approximately half of that. Members will not be surprised that the Carbon Trust has a free building design advice guide, which contains a detailed overview of all that people need to know about procuring good, energy-efficient buildings. The trust will help people to mitigate the climate change impacts from buildings by making the most of low-carbon design and technologies and ensuring that buildings are economically carbon responsible from their concept design through to their final occupation. The Carbon Trust has supported to the tune of £250,000 the development of an innovative new building membrane technology at the University of Aberdeen.

At about 1.5 per cent per annum of UK building stock, new build represents only a small fraction of the opportunities that are available to reduce carbon emissions from buildings. Although many older buildings have poor energy performance, buildings typically undergo major refurbishment every 20 to 30 years, which offers opportunities to reduce carbon emissions. There are online tools to help people working in offices, industrial buildings, sports centres, civil estates and hospitality premises to compare their energy use with that of similar organisations. The Carbon Trust operates from the large scale of carbon management programmes to the small scale of free starter packs, containing energy-saving fact sheets, energy-saving tips relevant to businesses, posters and stickers to motivate staff to take simple energy-saving measures, and details of the free products and services that the Carbon Trust offers to help people to make further savings.

People can phone the trust on 0800 085 2005 for free advice on any aspect of energy saving. Its experts will answer simple requests for information or detailed technical questions about particular technologies. A huge range of information can be found on its website, including everything from lists of suppliers of energy-efficient equipment to comparative studies of different technologies to the criteria for receiving financial and other help to start new companies. One such company is Clear Process, which is a spin-out company from the University of Aberdeen that was supported through its birth pangs by the Carbon Trust. Strategic and business development consultancy, advice on corporate finance, mentoring for management teams, energy-related market research and guidance on technical support are all available where there is carbon-saving potential.

The Carbon Trust has the financial capacity to co-invest to develop low-carbon technologies, to fund or part fund large-scale demonstration projects and to conduct research into and analysis of different technologies and models. Its great strengths are its independence, the objectivity of the research that it conducts or commissions and the reports that it produces.

I hope that this debate will help to spread the word about what the Carbon Trust can and will do to help organisations and businesses of every shape and size to rise to the challenge that we face and that we must meet of mitigating climate change by saving carbon.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Mr George Reid): NPA
The final item of business is a members' business debate on motion S2M-5207, in the name of Nora Radcliffe, on the Carbon Trust. The debate will be concluded...
Motion debated,
That the Parliament notes the recent successful parliamentary reception held by the Carbon Trust; values the role the trust plays in Scotland in helping orga...
Nora Radcliffe (Gordon) (LD): LD
I thank members for their support of the motion and the Carbon Trust for the excellent briefing that it circulated to members before the debate. Last but not...
The Presiding Officer: NPA
Each of the four members who wish to speak will have four minutes.
Sarah Boyack (Edinburgh Central) (Lab): Lab
I might not use all of my four minutes.I congratulate Nora Radcliffe on securing this timely debate, as I am sure colleagues will do. There was a huge turnou...
Richard Lochhead (Moray) (SNP): SNP
I congratulate Nora Radcliffe on securing the debate. We cannot talk enough about tackling climate change, and tonight's debate is another example of the rec...
Alex Johnstone (North East Scotland) (Con): Con
Like Richard Lochhead, I was unable to get to the reception that is mentioned in the motion. I am trying to remember where I was that night. Perhaps there wa...
Shiona Baird (North East Scotland) (Green): Green
I, too, thank Nora Radcliffe for lodging the motion for debate.As Richard Lochhead said, climate change is an important subject that cannot be debated too of...
The Deputy Minister for Enterprise and Lifelong Learning (Allan Wilson): Lab
I, too, commend Nora Radcliffe on securing this debate; I also commend the endurance of all members who have stayed on to participate.We welcome the debate. ...
Richard Lochhead: SNP
My reason for believing that we should have a single energy efficiency agency in Scotland is that it is imperative that the man or woman in the street is con...
Allan Wilson: Lab
I understand the argument for rationalisation in the sector, although I am not sure that I would agree with it, even if, as I said, we had the powers to deal...
Richard Lochhead: SNP
Will the minister update members on the timescale for the energy efficiency strategy? We are still waiting for it.
Allan Wilson: Lab
I hope to see it in the new year. The good news is that the delay is the result of energy efficiency and microgeneration being mainstreamed across all depart...
Meeting closed at 18:06.