Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,354,908
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Showing 60 of 2,354,908 contributions. Latest 30 days: 0. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 25 Mar 2026.
The Convener: LD Committee
23 Jan 2002
Tobacco Advertising and Promotion (Scotland) Bill
On balance, I favour the correspondence route at this stage. I do not know whether Robin Cook would be in a position to say much more to us if we were to have him before the committee now, because of the stage that the bill has reached in the process. It is likely that the Gov...
Mrs Smith: LD Committee
29 May 2001
Convener's Casting Vote
There is a pragmatic approach to the problem. Members often use stage 1 committee reports as an opportunity to flag up difficulties in the bill. They tend to welcome the general principles of the bill but use stage 1 to indicate that they have a problem with particular issues....
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
31 Mar 2004
Procedures Committee Inquiry
I strongly support Michael Matheson's comments. At stage 1, it is important that secondary committees have sufficient time to feed into the lead committee's consideration. Secondary committees sometimes flag up different issues because they approach the bill from a slightly di...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
28 Sep 2005
Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill: Preliminary Stage
As a member of the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill Committee, I begin by thanking my committee colleagues, the private bills unit, the promoter, the objectors, the campaigners and the witnesses for all the work that they have put in over the past two years, for which we owe t...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD) LD Chamber
16 Jun 2010
Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I thank the organisations and individuals who gave evidence to the Education, Lifelong Learning and Culture Committee during our stage 1 deliberations, and not just for their written and oral evidence but for their work as professionals and volunteers in the children’s hearing...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD) LD Chamber
20 Jan 2011
Historic Environment (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
I got so carried away listening to Ted Brocklebank that I did not realise that it was my turn next.I thank all those who have been involved with the bill, particularly those who gave evidence to us and have continued to contact us about the bill to offer their opinions. The co...
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
22 Apr 2009
Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I agree absolutely that the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee must consider the issue. We are in a unique set of circumstances. Obviously, issues to do with financial resolutions have cropped up in previous sessions of Parliament but, on those occasions, ...
Mrs Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
20 Mar 2003
Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Bill:<br />Stage 3
If ever I was going to be tempted by a Conservative, it would probably be by Mary Scanlon. I think that she would make not a bad Liberal Democrat.I would like to thank several people—the fact that they have been thanked already does not make my thanks any less heartfelt. Our c...
The Convener: LD Committee
29 Jan 2003
Mental Health (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
The Executive made it within the deadline of two days, although we hope to have as many amendments as possible lodged by five days before the meeting. However, provided that the Executive lodges its amendments by two days before the meeting, we cannot disallow them. The Proced...
Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
20 May 2009
Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
The group contains a number of important amendments. Amendments 1, 3A, 3B and 17 relate to looked-after and accommodated children. Members will be aware that I argued successfully at stage 2 that accommodated children should be deemed to have ASN. After our evidence taking and...
Margaret Smith LD Chamber
25 Nov 2010
Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
Throughout the bill process, members of the Education, Lifelong Learning and Culture Committee and the Government have been concerned about the criminalisation of children. The committee took evidence on that important issue from a number of children’s charities and from Scotl...
The Convener: LD Committee
16 Nov 1999
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I would like to make a point first, Kay. I want to ask the committee to express its concern at the way in which we have been forced to consider this important issue. It became clear to me, when I attended the Justice and Home Affairs Committee meeting, that many of the key poi...
The Convener: LD Committee
16 Nov 1999
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
We are being asked to say whether we are in favour of the general principles of the bill and to highlight any concerns that we have. Obviously, the full scrutiny of the bill will happen at stage 2. That is the point at which members of this committee can put down amendments. F...
The Convener: LD Committee
17 Nov 1999
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
We have had some further clarification of what we should be doing at this stage in our consideration of the bill. We have only a short time to pull together our thoughts at stage 1 and to pass those on to the Justice and Home Affairs Committee, which is the lead committee on t...
The Convener: LD Committee
20 Sep 2000
Legislation
I agree with you totally, Ben. On a point of clarification, the Executive will take its request to the Parliamentary Bureau. I will be at the bureau to represent the committee. We have moved on from the original procedure and, as a result of what happened to us, other relevant...
Mrs Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
09 Dec 1999
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I welcome the bill, which is much anticipated and long overdue, and will address gaps in the legal position regarding medical treatment and the financial affairs of up to 100,000 adults with incapacity. The chamber should extend thanks to the many individuals and organisations...
Mrs Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
29 Mar 2000
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
All members would like, I am sure, to pay tribute to the excellent work that has been done by the Justice and Home Affairs Committee throughout the passage of a complex bill. Members of the Health and Community Care Committee also had a part to play in the bill's passage—the c...
Mrs Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
28 Nov 2001
Community Care and Health (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
We have had an interesting debate. The ministerial team should take from it that the bill has the support of the whole chamber. Some outstanding issues remain to be worked through at stage 2. As convener of the Health and Community Care Committee, I look forward to doing that....
Mrs Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
11 Dec 2002
Mental Health (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I welcome this important bill, which is the most radical overhaul of the mental health legislation for 40 years. It comes at a time when most people would agree we need a new approach that recognises not only advances in treatment but the rights of those who experience mental ...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
29 Mar 2006
Edinburgh Tram (Line One) Bill
I thank the committee for its hard work over the past two years. I echo Jackie Baillie's comments about the impact on the committee of decisions that were taken by the City of Edinburgh Council on changes to the route; those decisions showed great disrespect to the Edinburgh T...
Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
14 Mar 2007
Edinburgh Airport Rail Link Bill: Final Stage
The committee found that any delays will be marginal—no more than five minutes—and that delays are more likely to affect local journeys than longer ones. Frankly, if the member has to ask what possibilities the scheme has for his area, that tells us more about his lack of visi...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
19 Nov 2009
Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
As part of any school closure proposal, it is essential that education authorities ensure that parents, parent councils and others have access to information and get answers to their questions timeously and without recourse to freedom of information legislation.The Scottish ru...
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
25 Mar 2009
Education<br />(Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I echo Ken Macintosh's comments. I am disappointed by what the minister said; in effect, it closes down parliamentary discussion and decision making on issues that were raised with us in our evidence sessions.The minister is well aware of a couple of the issues that I am raisi...
The Convener: LD Committee
17 Nov 1999
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
At this stage, stage 1, we should inform the Justice and Home Affairs Committee that, after listening to points that have been made to us in submissions, we feel that this is an area in which there may be a difficulty. If we feel that we want to do a specific piece of work on ...
The Convener: LD Committee
30 Jan 2001
Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
We are at the beginning of the process—we are at stage 1, during which we consider the general principles of the bill and whether relevant groups and individuals have been consulted in the most effective way. A lot of work remains to be done at stage 2, when we will get into l...
The Convener: LD Committee
28 Mar 2001
Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Agenda item 3 is stage 2 consideration of the Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill. This is our first consideration of a bill at stage 2. We have, of course, done work on the bill at stage 1.We are joined by Malcolm Chisholm, Deputy Minister for Health and Community Care, and hi...
The Convener: LD Committee
04 Apr 2001
Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
It is up to members to lodge amendments. There is an issue about the sheer volume of amendments that will be proposed at stage 3. The Presiding Officer must be made aware of the substantial number of amendments that will be lodged for that stage with ministerial and committee ...
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
02 Dec 2003
Vulnerable Witnesses (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
On Mike Pringle's behalf, I am happy to speak to amendment 6. It mirrors some of the views that were expressed in the committee's stage 1 report. The bill introduced the possibility of evidence being taken from a vulnerable witness by a commissioner and recorded by video link,...
Mrs Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
07 Mar 2001
Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I begin by thanking the members of the Health and Community Care Committee for their work on the bill. I thank the members of all the other committees that have considered the bill and the Deputy Minister for Health and Community Care for his assistance on various points.The S...
Mrs Smith: LD Chamber
20 Mar 2003
Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Bill:<br />Stage 3
How do I follow that? Mary Scanlon has provided classic examples of the difficulties to which I alluded earlier and of questions arising from the bill with which the Health and Community Care Committee has wrestled. We have had to make judgment calls at the narrow edges of a b...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
14 Jun 2006
Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill: Final Stage
The Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill was before the bill committee for nearly three years, during which time we took evidence from 108 witnesses and held 29 meetings in Edinburgh, Galashiels and Newtongrange. I hope that today we deliver what we have worked on for nearly three...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
20 May 2009
Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
The bill has been deemed necessary partly to restate some of the key messages of the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 in the wake of various court judgments, one of which was a decision by Lord Wheatley. The Education, Lifelong Learning and Cultu...
Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
20 May 2009
Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
I very much welcome amendment 18 and its focus on the need for advocacy support for parents and young people at tribunals. A case can be made for the need for advocacy services prior to that stage, so that parents can be supported earlier in the process and, indeed, so that di...
Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
20 May 2009
Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
I have a great deal of sympathy with what Ken Macintosh was trying to achieve with his stage 2 amendment. Over the years, certain local authorities have had, as we have heard, continuing disputes about the recovery of costs. Ken Macintosh sought to ensure a right of recovery w...
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
06 May 2009
Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
The stage at which the minister calls in a proposal is the one stage in the process for which there is no timetable. Is that acceptable, given the potential complexities of some decisions?
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
20 May 2009
Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
You mentioned the involvement of HMIE, which is a new process that the bill will introduce. We know that amendments can be made right up until the final day of stage 3, and that stage 3 is unlikely to be until November. You are proceeding on the basis of what is in the bill no...
The Convener: LD Committee
17 Nov 1999
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
At this stage, the committee can point out to the Justice and Home and Affairs Committee that we would like it to consider the question of backing up the welfare attorney either with a second opinion or with a secondary welfare attorney. Beyond that, we are into stage 2 territ...
The Convener: LD Committee
17 Nov 1999
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
At stage 2, the committee may feel that it wants to lodge an amendment on that. At this stage, we shall simply flag up the general feeling of the committee on that point. We must remember that we are supposed to be talking about general principles. We have sometimes gone beyon...
The Convener: LD Committee
17 Nov 1999
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
First, that is a stage 2 issue. Secondly, there is claim and counter-claim. Today we are discussing the general principles of the bill. However, we are possibly exceeding our role, although there are obvious reasons for that. We are saying to members of the Justice and Home Af...
The Convener (Mrs Margaret Smith): LD Committee
26 Apr 2000
Budget Process
Good morning. Welcome to today's meeting of the Health and Community Care Committee.The first item on the agenda is the budget 2001-02. As committee members will remember, there is a new process for scrutiny of the budget, whereby not only the parliamentary committees but the ...
The Convener: LD Committee
24 Jan 2001
Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
We move now to today's first group of witnesses in our stage 1 consideration of the Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill. First up are the witnesses from the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities. I welcome Councillor Miller, Mr McLeary and Mr Wiseman to the meeting.During st...
The Convener: LD Committee
04 Apr 2001
Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
It is entirely up to the Presiding Officer. Given the likely volume of stage 3 amendments, I will certainly discuss the matter with him at some point between now and stage 3. That will be useful for both of us.
The Convener: LD Committee
30 Oct 2002
Mental Health (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
No, those were interesting comments. Without wanting to speak on behalf of my colleagues before we have discussed our stage 1 report, I can say that some of the issues that you raise have been raised privately among ourselves in our work on the bill so far. We echo your commen...
The Convener: LD Committee
29 Jan 2003
Mental Health (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I will clarify the situation and then ask the minister for her input. Interruption. I am advised that there was no pre-emption. Pre-emptions exist only if amendments amend text that has already been taken out, and section 83 had not been taken out at that stage. The text was s...
The Convener: LD Committee
18 Feb 2003
Mental Health (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Agenda item 2 is stage 2 of the Mental Health (Scotland) Bill. This is the committee's final meeting for stage 2 of the bill. Members should not all cheer at once.
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
10 Dec 2003
Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
We are still in the middle of taking oral evidence and we do not want to come to conclusions before we have all the evidence before us. However, there are already some gaps in the evidence that we could try to address before we write our report. Stewart Maxwell referred to one...
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
24 Nov 2004
Emergency Workers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
I wish to put the case for the inclusion of professionally qualified social workers"taking action required or permitted by a child protection order."The main objectives of the bill are twofold. The first is to protect emergency workers. We heard compelling evidence from the Br...
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
21 Mar 2005
Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill: Preliminary Stage
I want to pick up on what SEPA has said. At a couple of points in your submission, you highlight your concerns about construction works that"are likely to cause disruption to affected watercourses, principally the Gala water."You highlight the fact that"there is little detail ...
Margaret Smith: LD Committee
24 May 2006
Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill: Consideration Stage
In response to concerns that were expressed by objectors in evidence about the uncertainty surrounding if and when the railway would be constructed, we stated in our consideration stage report that we would amend the bill to reduce the time period for which the compulsory purc...
Mrs Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
31 May 2001
Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
The nub of the issue is how we can deliver effectively quality care standards backed by a qualified, professional and motivated staff. It would be ridiculous not to acknowledge the impact that national care standards, and the changes that they will bring about in care services...
Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
28 Apr 2004
Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
Other speakers have already indicated that this is the most controversial part of the bill and that the Justice 1 Committee had a number of concerns about it. However, we recognised the problem that the Executive was trying to address. Absconding affects nearly 500 court cases...
Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
28 Apr 2004
Criminal Procedure (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
I agree that we should pursue anything that can be done to ensure that there are only a small number of cases in which the accused fails to appear. We have all sought to introduce important safeguards into the process. However, as the minister said, some safeguards are in the ...
Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
30 Sep 2004
Emergency Workers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I do not disagree. I echo the point that Margaret Mitchell has made on many occasions, which is that anything that goes into the legislation should be only part of a wider package of protection for emergency workers, or, indeed, workers more generally. In particular, I would i...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
22 Dec 2004
Emergency Workers (Scotland) Bill
Like most members, I agreed that we needed legislation on the issue. As Margaret Mitchell said, who would not stand up and say that we want to give the best possible protection to emergency workers? However, as we went through the process of scrutinising the bill, we realised ...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
23 Feb 2005
Edinburgh Tram (Line Two) Bill: Preliminary Stage
I welcome the opportunity to speak in the debate. The provision of public transport options is one of the most important issues for my constituency of Edinburgh West and for the city as a whole. I thank the Edinburgh Tram (Line Two) Bill Committee for its hard work to date, an...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
22 Jun 2005
Licensing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
On behalf of the Liberal Democrats, I welcome Derek Brownlee to his new position and wish him well in his new role. I hope that he will get support from members throughout the chamber, particularly in his first few weeks, when—like the rest of us when we first came to the buil...
Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
22 Jun 2005
Licensing (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Some representatives of the trade argued for the automatic transfer of rights and licences to people who hold a licence under the current system. Committee members thought that that approach would be wrong and would create a two-tier system. We want the bill to raise standards...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
14 Dec 2005
Interests of Members of the Scottish Parliament Bill: Stage 1
Although many Liberal Democrat members have significant concerns about aspects of the bill, there are parts of it with which I agree. I agree with the points that Linda Fabiani and others made about overseas travel and paid advocacy. I agree, too, with John Home Robertson that...
Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD): LD Chamber
14 May 2008
Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
Due to my recent illness, unfortunately I was absent from some of the Justice Committee's deliberations on the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Bill. I compliment my committee colleagues on the very good job that they have done and the excellent stage 1 report that they have pr...
Margaret Smith: LD Chamber
04 Mar 2009
Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Bill: <br />Stage 1
I welcome the minister's statement of that position. We will be in a slightly difficult position if we start to make CSPs part of the reason why certain matters do or do not go to tribunals. That issue was raised—perhaps surprisingly—by the City of Edinburgh Council. We have a...
← Back to list
Committee

Health and Community Care Committee, 23 Jan 2002

23 Jan 2002 · S1 · Health and Community Care Committee
Item of business
Tobacco Advertising and Promotion (Scotland) Bill
On balance, I favour the correspondence route at this stage. I do not know whether Robin Cook would be in a position to say much more to us if we were to have him before the committee now, because of the stage that the bill has reached in the process. It is likely that the Government will make its view known at the end of February, once the bill has gone through the parliamentary procedure in the House of Lords, so we will have a clearer view then, when we will be pulling together our stage 1 report. The dates relating to the process in the House of Lords are the dates I have been given by Tim Clement-Jones's office. We should remember that the last time the committee was unhappy about the amount of evidence that had been taken at stage 1, on the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Bill, we took evidence from witnesses at stage 2. The bill contained such fundamental differences when it came for consideration at stage 2, because the Executive had listened to what was said at stage 1, that we took evidence from parents groups. I suggest that we write to seek clarification of the UK Government's position and the time scale in the House of Lords. We should state in our letter that we see it as the first stage in clarifying the UK position and that we may well, in the fullness of time, want to return to the UK Government once we see the written evidence that it gives the committee. If we want to take evidence from anybody else at stage 2, we would still be able to do so. As far as I am aware, we do not have a date for a debate on the stage 1 report in the chamber. I think that the date for that and the date for the bill at Westminster having gone through the parliamentary procedure in the House of Lords will be contemporaneous. Another issue is whether we want to hear further evidence. I am keen that we take expert evidence on brand stretching, to investigate whether we could close a potential loophole before further progress is made on the legislation. If we cannot do that at present, one option might be to come back to that at stage 1. That is just my view.

In the same item of business

The Convener: LD
Good morning, Dr Wrench.We move to agenda item 3, which is the Tobacco Advertising and Promotion (Scotland) Bill. As colleagues know, the bill is being promo...
Dr John Wrench (Highland NHS Board):
I would like to make a short statement.Thank you for the opportunity to give evidence to the committee. I should state that I am representing my own views an...
Nicola Sturgeon (Glasgow) (SNP): SNP
Thank you for your submission, Dr Wrench. Although you express support for the principles of the bill in your submission, you also support action at UK level...
Dr Wrench:
I would support such an approach, given that there has already been a delay in implementing the UK legislation. From a public health point of view, I would s...
Nicola Sturgeon: SNP
Do you agree with the view of many experts that, although a completely comprehensive ban—which could probably be achieved only at European level—is the most ...
Dr Wrench:
Yes. It is clear that the degree of the impact is proportional to the completeness of the ban. However, it would still be worthwhile to go ahead with a Scott...
Nicola Sturgeon: SNP
You have some concerns about the defences that are outlined in section 4 of the bill. Could you expand on those views, particularly on how some of the defenc...
Dr Wrench:
We have not gone into the legal implications in detail but, on reading the bill, it seemed to us that the number and degree of defences raised the possibilit...
Janis Hughes (Glasgow Rutherglen) (Lab): Lab
In your submission you talk about the monetary cost of smoking. Given that this week there has been much publicity about children living in poverty, particul...
Dr Wrench:
Yes. I cannot quote specific research, although I know that general research supports what is in my submission. People have expressed the concern that if the...
The Convener: LD
Nicola Sturgeon made the point that many people take the view that a UK ban would be preferable, that a European ban would be even better, but that we might ...
Dr Wrench:
It is difficult to say. It is true that international research in Norway, Finland, New Zealand and France shows that national bans have a greater impact. How...
The Convener: LD
Do you mean if the ban applied only to Scotland?
Dr Wrench:
Yes, I think so, but I am giving you an empirical answer. It is difficult to base an answer on objective evidence.
The Convener: LD
Do you think that the Department of Health's 2.5 per cent estimate is pessimistic?
Dr Wrench:
I think that, compared to studies that I have seen and discussed with other people, its estimate would be considered to be low.
The Convener: LD
The word "low" is probably a better word to use. I wrote down that it was a "conservative estimate," but I do not want to get my parties mixed up.
Mary Scanlon: Con
In your written submission you mentioned that recent research confirmed that in four countries—Norway, Finland, New Zealand and France—in which a ban on toba...
Dr Wrench:
The first question I ask is whether the ban in the countries from which you quoted the not-so-good figures is part of a wider tobacco-control strategy. The e...
Mary Scanlon: Con
I want to ask about that. I find the different figures confusing to look at. I would support anything that would reduce smoking and improve women's and child...
Dr Wrench:
To focus on Finland for a minute, I am surprised by the figures that you have quoted for that country, not only in relation to the ban on tobacco advertising...
Mary Scanlon: Con
It is not my research, but the Scottish Parliament's.
Dr Wrench:
Because we are dealing with a moving scenario, it is very difficult to measure a specific output or outcome from advertising bans or restrictions. We need to...
Mary Scanlon: Con
I would be very happy with a reduction in the number of people smoking. However, the figures before me suggest that there has been an increase in tobacco con...
The Convener: LD
If we require further clarification of that issue, we can return to it.
Nicola Sturgeon: SNP
For the record, it may be useful for Dr Wrench to know that the figures that Mary Scanlon is citing are 12 years out of date—they cover the period up to 1990...
Dr Wrench:
That is my view. It is very important to stress that any ban would be part of a wider tobacco-control strategy.
Bill Butler (Glasgow Anniesland) (Lab): Lab
Would you care to elaborate on the point that you made in paragraph 4 of your submission about brand sharing or brand stretching? Do you know of any evidence...
Dr Wrench:
There is evidence of companies latching their brand name on to other products that children and young people may be interested in buying. I am sure that ther...
Bill Butler: Lab
Dr Wrench might wish to submit written information on brand stretching. The assertion in his submission must be based on evidence. He has made some general p...