Committee
Equal Opportunities Committee, 16 Dec 2002
16 Dec 2002 · S1 · Equal Opportunities Committee
Item of business
Chhokar Inquiries<br />(Jandoo Report)
I welcome Mr and Mrs Chhokar, Mrs Manjit Sangha and Mr Aamer Anwar to give evidence on the report by Dr Raj Jandoo. I realise that it must be difficult to come along and give evidence after such a long time, but we hope that today's meeting will be useful. If at any time during the evidence session you feel that you want to stop and take a break, please indicate that to me so that I can suspend the meeting for a short period.This morning's proceedings are being translated from and into Punjabi. For people in the public gallery and in the chamber, the English translation can be heard by selecting channel 1 on the headphones, while the translation into Punjabi can be heard by selecting channel 2. For the benefit of the interpreters, members are asked not to speak too quickly.Members will recall that, at our meeting on 19 December 2000, we agreed to recommendation 5 of Michael McMahon's paper, which was that the committee should consider the manner in which the Jandoo inquiry was conducted and question the Lord Advocate and the Minister for Justice on the implementation of the recommendations.Following publication of the Jandoo report, the committee further discussed the issue on 30 October 2001, when we agreed to consider holding a public meeting at a location more convenient to the Chhokar family in view of Mr Chhokar's health at that time. Following the recent meeting between Michael McMahon and the family, it was agreed that the meeting should be held in Edinburgh. I am glad that Mr Chhokar feels well enough to attend today's meeting.Before we start taking evidence, I want to mention that the committee was given legal advice not to publish the submission from the Chhokar family justice campaign. Having discussed the matter, the committee feels strongly that we want to publish it. We have therefore decided to seek further legal advice in order to allow the submission to be published. That is the wish of the committee.Before we move to questions from members, I invite the witnesses to make a brief opening statement, which I understand will be made by Aamer Anwar. Obviously, if anyone else wants to say anything, they can simply indicate that to me and that will not be a problem.
In the same item of business
The Convener (Kate Maclean):
Lab
I welcome Mr and Mrs Chhokar, Mrs Manjit Sangha and Mr Aamer Anwar to give evidence on the report by Dr Raj Jandoo. I realise that it must be difficult to co...
Mr Aamer Anwar:
We welcome the committee's invitation to give evidence today. We hope that the committee will utilise this opportunity to allow us to set the record straight...
The Convener:
Lab
Thank you. Does anyone else want to say anything at this stage or will we go right to questions?
Mr Darshan Singh Chhokar:
(simultaneous interpretation) Why did you not listen to whatever Aamer has said? If you do not understand, why do you not ask again? I cannot understand why ...
The Convener:
Lab
I am sorry, Mr Chhokar. I apologise for the fact that it is very distressing for you to give evidence to us. The committee does not feel that you are on tria...
Kay Ullrich (West of Scotland) (SNP):
SNP
Thank you so much for coming before the committee this morning. I was particularly struck by what Mr Chhokar has just said, which underlines what the family ...
Mr Anwar:
Manjit Sangha will respond to that. However, before she does so, I want to state that the whole process by which Dr Jandoo arrived at his recommendations was...
Mr Chhokar:
(simultaneous interpretation) If I am a soldier, what can I say against my colonel? I am under his command. You keep saying that the Jandoo recommendations a...
Kay Ullrich:
SNP
I was particularly struck by Mrs Manjit Sangha's statement. She said that Jandoo"gives accounts of the interpreting problems that demonstrates no comprehensi...
Mr Chhokar:
(simultaneous interpretation) Whatever is being done, I am not blind or deaf and I have seen and know the world. I know a bit about courts and juries, but pe...
Mr Anwar:
You must understand that this is distressing for Mr Chhokar.
Kay Ullrich:
SNP
Indeed.
Mr Anwar:
The family and I read through the report's recommendations and we have to say that, yes, we welcome the recommendations about the police, but I do not think ...
Mrs Manjit Sangha:
Even the letter that my dad got telling him to go to the court in Hamilton last month was written in English. Then a guy was brought into the courtroom as a ...
Kay Ullrich:
SNP
I find that appalling. You are saying that the Jandoo recommendations are not being acted on.
Mrs Sangha:
Yes.
Kay Ullrich:
SNP
We are back to square one.
Mrs Sangha:
Yes.
Kay Ullrich:
SNP
Okay. Thank you.
Elaine Smith (Coatbridge and Chryston) (Lab):
Lab
I thank the family for coming along to speak to the committee. I had questions about the Jandoo report and how it is being taken forward. What has just been ...
Mr Chhokar:
(simultaneous interpretation) As far as a public inquiry is concerned, I keep asking that you give me justice—everybody knows that these people killed my son...
Mrs Sangha:
We wanted to have a public inquiry so that everything could be straightforward and done in front of everybody. The inquiries were carried out behind closed d...
Mr Anwar:
Elaine Smith read out a paragraph of our submission. I think that the inquiry was fundamentally flawed. Elish Angiolini, who is now the Solicitor General for...
Tommy Sheridan (Glasgow) (SSP):
SSP
I thank the family for taking the time and making the difficult effort to come here today. The committee appreciates it and we hope to be a source of support...
Mrs Sangha:
Yes, we would love that.
Mr Chhokar:
(simultaneous interpretation) I cannot understand why there have been so many inquiries and why they are all based on me. Nobody has asked the ones who murde...
Mrs Sangha:
We would still like to have a public inquiry. We are not happy with the reports that we have got—we are very disappointed.
Mr Anwar:
In his statement to the Parliament when the second trial finished, the Lord Advocate said that he was against a public inquiry because it would prolong the a...
Tommy Sheridan:
SSP
I was particularly struck by—Interruption.
The Convener:
Lab
There is a problem with the interpretation—it is being broadcast on the wrong channel.