Chamber
Meeting of the Parliament 29 October 2013
29 Oct 2013 · S4 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Landfill Tax (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1
I am delighted to have the opportunity to speak on the Landfill Tax (Scotland) Bill and I welcome its stage 1 completion. I thank fellow members of the Finance Committee for their commitment, interest and dedication in scrutinising the general principles of this important bill. I also thank the Government for its feedback on the committee’s report, which has made the Government’s position clear on a number of the committee’s concerns.
As a result of the bill, the Scottish ministers will become the tax authority for the purposes of the Scottish landfill tax. That is a great step forward. I have confidence in the ability of the Scottish ministers and their staff to take responsibility for the Scottish landfill tax as well as for other important taxes such as the Scottish rate of income tax. The bill enables ministers to make an order to designate another tax authority, and I welcome the move by the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth to set up a new body, revenue Scotland, as Scotland’s tax authority for devolved taxation. Revenue Scotland already exists as an administrative function within the Government, and the Government has been consulting on provisions to establish it on a statutory footing.
The Government has indicated that it intends that the administration and collection of the Scottish landfill tax should be undertaken by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency on behalf of revenue Scotland. Landfill tax administration and collection would become a new function for SEPA, which already visits and inspects landfill sites as part of its environmental regulation duties. That would offer significant advantages for the Government. The existing knowledge and considerable expertise in SEPA will create opportunities for significant efficiencies and other operational benefits in relation to the administration and collection of the Scottish landfill tax. I therefore support the Scottish Government’s intention to have SEPA in charge of the administration and collection of the tax.
Although I give full support to the general principles of the bill, I draw the Parliament’s attention to two areas of concern. First, I believe that one further waste exemption could be considered. Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 states:
“If no person has, after reasonable inquiry, been found who is by virtue of subsection (2) above an appropriate person to bear responsibility for the things which are to be done by way of remediation, the owner or occupier for the time being of the contaminated land in question is an appropriate person.”
That means—I think—that individual property owners might end up footing the bill for contaminated land remediation through no fault of their own. There are live examples of individual householders who have been charged vast sums for the remediation of contaminated land.
In the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth’s statement to Parliament on 7 June 2012, he described four principles that underlie the Government’s approach to taxation and he reiterated them today. They are certainty, convenience, efficiency and that the tax is proportionate to the ability to pay. It is that final principle that I believe is relevant here. My suggestion is that consideration should be given to including in the bill a measure to allow for the costs of contaminated land remediation to be waived if an individual property owner is found to be on contaminated land, has in no way caused the contamination but yet has been unfortunately designated the status of appropriate person because of the lack of someone being found who actually caused the contamination. By putting such a measure in place, the Scottish Government would ensure that its principle of taxation being proportionate to the ability to pay is adhered to.
The second concern relates to the committee’s suggestion that there should be a lower rate of tax on island waste, for materials for which there are never likely to be viable recycling or recovery routes. Although the Government has made its position clear on that, I still believe that a review of the issue could be carried out. In Shetland, Enviroglass provides a local solution for Shetland’s waste glass by recycling all the glass that is collected by the local authority through its bottle banks. That has been essential in minimising the financial and environmental costs that shipping glass to mainland UK for recycling would incur. However, not all island communities are fortunate enough to benefit from such a scheme and a review could help to find alternatives for the islands that lack the means to cheaply recycle waste materials.
A final aspect of the bill that I will speak about relates to the Scottish Government’s zero waste agenda, which is an ambitious programme of change that aims to create an environment in which we make the most of resources and minimise Scotland’s demand on primary resources. That is to be achieved by maximising the reuse, recycling and recovery of resources rather than treating them as waste. The Scottish landfill tax will play an important role in maintaining the economic stimulus that is required to harness those waste management opportunities and in directing the Scottish economy towards a prosperous future with secure access to resources. By doing so, Scotland could follow the great example of its Nordic neighbour Sweden and make productive use of waste that would otherwise build up at landfill sites.
We must ensure that environmental organisations continue to be supported by the landfill communities fund. The Scottish Wildlife Trust, for example, has received £3.6 million to date, which has helped it to develop and manage essential environmental and community projects.
The Landfill Tax (Scotland) Bill is a good and valuable piece of legislation. It does what it is supposed to do: it provides legislative provisions for a Scottish landfill tax to replace the UK landfill tax regime. It provides the Scottish Government with real power to take important decisions on a crucial area of taxation and makes use of the experience and expertise of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency. It is conducive to the Scottish Government’s zero waste agenda as we look to greener energy alternatives. Therefore, I support the general principles of the bill.
16:25
As a result of the bill, the Scottish ministers will become the tax authority for the purposes of the Scottish landfill tax. That is a great step forward. I have confidence in the ability of the Scottish ministers and their staff to take responsibility for the Scottish landfill tax as well as for other important taxes such as the Scottish rate of income tax. The bill enables ministers to make an order to designate another tax authority, and I welcome the move by the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth to set up a new body, revenue Scotland, as Scotland’s tax authority for devolved taxation. Revenue Scotland already exists as an administrative function within the Government, and the Government has been consulting on provisions to establish it on a statutory footing.
The Government has indicated that it intends that the administration and collection of the Scottish landfill tax should be undertaken by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency on behalf of revenue Scotland. Landfill tax administration and collection would become a new function for SEPA, which already visits and inspects landfill sites as part of its environmental regulation duties. That would offer significant advantages for the Government. The existing knowledge and considerable expertise in SEPA will create opportunities for significant efficiencies and other operational benefits in relation to the administration and collection of the Scottish landfill tax. I therefore support the Scottish Government’s intention to have SEPA in charge of the administration and collection of the tax.
Although I give full support to the general principles of the bill, I draw the Parliament’s attention to two areas of concern. First, I believe that one further waste exemption could be considered. Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 states:
“If no person has, after reasonable inquiry, been found who is by virtue of subsection (2) above an appropriate person to bear responsibility for the things which are to be done by way of remediation, the owner or occupier for the time being of the contaminated land in question is an appropriate person.”
That means—I think—that individual property owners might end up footing the bill for contaminated land remediation through no fault of their own. There are live examples of individual householders who have been charged vast sums for the remediation of contaminated land.
In the Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth’s statement to Parliament on 7 June 2012, he described four principles that underlie the Government’s approach to taxation and he reiterated them today. They are certainty, convenience, efficiency and that the tax is proportionate to the ability to pay. It is that final principle that I believe is relevant here. My suggestion is that consideration should be given to including in the bill a measure to allow for the costs of contaminated land remediation to be waived if an individual property owner is found to be on contaminated land, has in no way caused the contamination but yet has been unfortunately designated the status of appropriate person because of the lack of someone being found who actually caused the contamination. By putting such a measure in place, the Scottish Government would ensure that its principle of taxation being proportionate to the ability to pay is adhered to.
The second concern relates to the committee’s suggestion that there should be a lower rate of tax on island waste, for materials for which there are never likely to be viable recycling or recovery routes. Although the Government has made its position clear on that, I still believe that a review of the issue could be carried out. In Shetland, Enviroglass provides a local solution for Shetland’s waste glass by recycling all the glass that is collected by the local authority through its bottle banks. That has been essential in minimising the financial and environmental costs that shipping glass to mainland UK for recycling would incur. However, not all island communities are fortunate enough to benefit from such a scheme and a review could help to find alternatives for the islands that lack the means to cheaply recycle waste materials.
A final aspect of the bill that I will speak about relates to the Scottish Government’s zero waste agenda, which is an ambitious programme of change that aims to create an environment in which we make the most of resources and minimise Scotland’s demand on primary resources. That is to be achieved by maximising the reuse, recycling and recovery of resources rather than treating them as waste. The Scottish landfill tax will play an important role in maintaining the economic stimulus that is required to harness those waste management opportunities and in directing the Scottish economy towards a prosperous future with secure access to resources. By doing so, Scotland could follow the great example of its Nordic neighbour Sweden and make productive use of waste that would otherwise build up at landfill sites.
We must ensure that environmental organisations continue to be supported by the landfill communities fund. The Scottish Wildlife Trust, for example, has received £3.6 million to date, which has helped it to develop and manage essential environmental and community projects.
The Landfill Tax (Scotland) Bill is a good and valuable piece of legislation. It does what it is supposed to do: it provides legislative provisions for a Scottish landfill tax to replace the UK landfill tax regime. It provides the Scottish Government with real power to take important decisions on a crucial area of taxation and makes use of the experience and expertise of the Scottish Environment Protection Agency. It is conducive to the Scottish Government’s zero waste agenda as we look to greener energy alternatives. Therefore, I support the general principles of the bill.
16:25
In the same item of business
The Presiding Officer (Tricia Marwick)
NPA
The next item of business is a debate on motion S4M-08040, in the name of John Swinney, on the Landfill Tax (Scotland) Bill. I will give the cabinet secretar...
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance, Employment and Sustainable Growth (John Swinney)
SNP
As members know, the Landfill Tax (Scotland) Bill is the second bill to establish devolved taxes under the limited powers in the Scotland Act 2012. It follow...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP)
SNP
There has been some criticism that the cost of administering the UK system is quite high. Does the cabinet secretary think that administrative costs can be l...
John Swinney
SNP
I thank Mr Mason for his intervention, and I acknowledge and agree with the concerns that have been expressed about the UK communities fund’s cumbersome mana...
Stewart Stevenson (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)
SNP
Does the cabinet secretary recognise that in Catalonia, for example, from 2004 to 2009 there was a reduction of approximately 20 per cent in their equivalent...
John Swinney
SNP
The evidence speaks for itself on the effectiveness of the zero waste strategy in reducing the amount and the volume of waste that is going to landfill. It i...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (John Scott)
Con
Many thanks, cabinet secretary. I call Kenneth Gibson to speak on behalf of the Finance Committee. Mr Gibson, you have 10 minutes or thereby.14:58
Kenneth Gibson (Cunninghame North) (SNP)
SNP
I am pleased to debate the Landfill Tax (Scotland) Bill and to highlight some key areas that the Finance Committee considered during its stage 1 scrutiny of ...
Stewart Stevenson
SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Kenneth Gibson
SNP
I am in my last minute but, if I am able to, I am happy to take an intervention.
The Deputy Presiding Officer
Con
You may.
Stewart Stevenson
SNP
Is the member aware that, in Sweden, between 2000 and 2009 the tax take dropped to one fifth of the original figure because of success in the programmes to t...
Kenneth Gibson
SNP
It appears that the Scottish Government’s policies are fairly conservative, as it envisages only a 60 per cent reduction. Clearly, from what the member says,...
Iain Gray (East Lothian) (Lab)
Lab
I support the general principles of the Landfill Tax (Scotland) Bill. Those who consider it to be a rather dry and dull piece of revenue legislation, perhaps...
John Mason
SNP
I agree with Iain Gray: we welcome the new powers. Does he agree that the rate at which powers have come to the Parliament has been disappointingly slow?
Iain Gray
Lab
Actually, I do not. Indeed, my next point rather contradicts Mr Mason’s point. An examination of the years of devolution would show that powers have shifted ...
Gavin Brown (Lothian) (Con)
Con
Working on the bill in the Finance Committee has been pretty interesting and rewarding at times. At this stage, the Scottish Government’s overall direction o...
John Mason
SNP
I wonder whether the member is making a bit more of that issue than should be the case. My reading of the matter at face value was that the rate would not be...
Gavin Brown
Con
That may give Mr Mason comfort. I merely put it on the public record that it would be helpful if we got just a bit more clarity from the Scottish Government,...
Stewart Stevenson
SNP
Is the member aware of article 11 of Council directive 1999/31/EC?
Kenneth Gibson
SNP
Who isnae?
Stewart Stevenson
SNP
I am sure that Gavin Brown will have read it intensely. Article 11 specifically addresses the issue of differences between regimes, not just in Europe but wo...
Gavin Brown
Con
The member is on fire today—he has told us about Catalonia and Sweden and now we are hearing about some old directives, too. In all seriousness, it would be ...
Jamie Hepburn (Cumbernauld and Kilsyth) (SNP)
SNP
In welcoming the debate, I congratulate the cabinet secretary on managing to finagle a mention of Adam Smith into his speech. As someone who studied Adam Smi...
Malcolm Chisholm (Edinburgh Northern and Leith) (Lab)
Lab
The landfill tax has been a fairly successful environmental tax at a UK level, with a 30 per cent reduction in the amount of waste sent to landfill since 199...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (SNP)
SNP
Yesterday, one of my staff told somebody that I was the only MSP who was interested in the landfill tax, but that was a bit unfair. The Finance Committee has...
Stewart Stevenson
SNP
Is the member aware that article 2 of the EC landfill directive of 1999 specifically makes provision for communities that have“no more than 500 inhabitants p...
John Mason
SNP
The member would have to ask people who are better placed than I am whether we are doing as much as we could. I still think that the direction that the bill ...
Gavin Brown
Con
Will the member give way?
John Mason
SNP
Let me just finish the point. In some cases, I have seen the little waste receptacles being used as mini-buckets to store mops in, which is not what they wer...