Committee
Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee 16 November 2022
16 Nov 2022 · S6 · Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee
Item of business
Hunting with Dogs (Scotland) Bill
I have a follow-up question. I am concerned that the exemption in section 6 of the bill, which includes rough shooting, will undermine the wider purpose of the bill because, essentially, it allows for more than two dogs to be present during an activity that involves flushing wild mammals, whereas that is not permissible for flushing foxes. The rationale seems to hang on the idea that, on a rough shoot, groups of more than two dogs can be prevented from forming a pack. I am interested in hearing a bit more about the evidence base for why that is possible in rough shooting circumstances but not when foxes are being flushed. Why, in one instance, is it believed that the level of control over dogs will prevent them from forming a pack, losing control and potentially killing the animal whereas, when foxes are involved, the claim is that it is not possible to control dogs and prevent a pack from forming? To an outsider—I have not been on a shoot—it seems that foxes and rabbits are wild mammals. I am not clear on the distinction and the rationale behind the exemption.
In the same item of business
The Convener (Finlay Carson)
Con
Good morning, and welcome to the 30th meeting in 2022 of the Rural Affairs, Islands and Natural Environment Committee. I remind members who are using electro...
Hugh Dignon (Scottish Government)
It is a fairly broad term that encompasses a lot of different sorts of shooting. I suppose that you could characterise it as being informal in its nature com...
The Convener
Con
There would be no intention for a dog to chase a rabbit, hare or pheasant; it is all about flushing. The purpose of a rough shoot is to shoot and not to have...
Hugh Dignon
Yes.
The Convener
Con
On that basis, is it intended through the bill to ultimately or effectively ban or prevent rough shooting, as you have described it?
Hugh Dignon
No, there is no intention to do that at all. The bill seeks to regulate the use of dogs to flush mammals. Where that is happening as part of rough shooting, ...
The Convener
Con
Would you describe an impact on rough shooting as an unintended consequence of the legislation?
Hugh Dignon
I am not sure that “unintended consequence” is exactly the right phrase, because, if someone’s version of rough shooting involved using a number of dogs—more...
The Convener
Con
Was your understanding of rough shooting complete enough to allow you to understand exactly what the implications of the two-dog limit would be on rough shoo...
Hugh Dignon
It is fair to say that we have looked more closely at it and that we have considered how the provisions of the bill would apply to what happens on the ground...
Rachael Hamilton (Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire) (Con)
Con
To be clear, Mr Dignon, on what basis did you form your idea of what a rough shoot is? Did you go on one? Did you seek witnesses? Did you watch a rough shoot...
Hugh Dignon
Yes—I did all those things. I have been on rough shoots before, I have friends who rough shoot, I looked at it on YouTube, and I talked with stakeholders.
Rachael Hamilton
Con
Will you confirm that it is not your intention to restrict rough shooting through the scope of the bill?
Hugh Dignon
No, it is not. As I have explained to the convener, the intention is to regulate the use of dogs being used to hunt mammals, to ensure that they are not allo...
Rachael Hamilton
Con
When you looked into what rough shooting is or formed your understanding and shared it with your bill team, did you get information that said that dogs that ...
Hugh Dignon
I understand that it is primarily gun dogs that are used, but I do not suppose that it is exclusively gun dogs. A variety of dog species might be used, but I...
The Convener
Con
Finally on that topic, it is reassuring to know that you did your research into rough shooting. Did you do that research prior to the bill being introduced, ...
Hugh Dignon
I was reasonably familiar with it before, but we certainly went back to look more closely at the issue following the concerns that were raised. 10:15
Ariane Burgess (Highlands and Islands) (Green)
Green
What was the rationale for taking a different approach to the number of dogs when it comes to rough shooting compared with other types of hunting with dogs? ...
Hugh Dignon
The first thing that I would like to say is that we are not making an exception or changing the provisions of the bill in any way to accommodate rough shooti...
Alasdair Allan (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP)
SNP
On the back of that, can you take us through the issues that were considered in reaching an approach whereby there is a difference in the number of dogs that...
Hugh Dignon
Perhaps I have not been successful in getting this across, but we are not changing the number of dogs that can be used for rough shooting. The same provision...
Mercedes Villalba (North East Scotland) (Lab)
Lab
I have a follow-up question. I am concerned that the exemption in section 6 of the bill, which includes rough shooting, will undermine the wider purpose of t...
Hugh Dignon
As I have said, there is not a specific exemption for rough shooting. If someone was flushing a fox with two dogs and, separately from them, someone else was...
Mercedes Villalba
Lab
I expect that we will come on to this in more detail later, when we discuss enforcement, but it sounds as though you are saying that, as long as there are en...
Hugh Dignon
I would take issue with the phrase “plausible deniability”. If someone is operating a pack of dogs, it is clear that that is what is happening. In practice, ...
Jim Fairlie (Perthshire South and Kinross-shire) (SNP)
SNP
To clarify that, did the Government give any consideration to the point that Mercedes Villalba brought up about what is different about people working with t...
Hugh Dignon
I think that that is the reality of it, but the law is not setting out to differentiate between different types of dogs. It is talking about the number of do...
Jim Fairlie
SNP
Does that come back to the point that, if you have the intent to flush, you will use a particular type of dog? I know that the bill does not specify the type...
Hugh Dignon
Yes. As I said, that is the reality of it. It is not my job to do this, but I am guessing that that is the sort of thing that might be taken into account in ...