Chamber
Plenary, 21 May 2008
21 May 2008 · S3 · Plenary
Item of business
Insulin Pumps
I welcome the opportunity to take part in this evening's debate on the provision of insulin pumps and congratulate David Stewart on bringing the issue to the Parliament. As other members have said, the subject is important, as it affects not just the treatment of type 1 diabetes but the whole NHS.
As Nanette Milne said, type 1 diabetes is an extremely serious issue in Scotland, given the high incidence of the condition here—the third highest in the world. We have about 197,000 sufferers of diabetes, more than 26,000, or 15 per cent, of whom have type 1 diabetes. That is an extremely large number.
As other members have said, the condition has a significant impact on young people, 35 per 100,000 of whom are affected by it. That has an impact not only on their lives, but on those of their families and on the support that the NHS provides through treatment of continuing illnesses.
It is clear that the use of insulin pumps can make the treatment of type 1 diabetes more effective, in that it can help people to manage their condition, make them more disciplined and contribute to an improved quality of life. The disparity between the use of insulin pumps in Scotland and in the rest of the UK and internationally is a concern. About 1 per cent of people in Scotland who have type 1 diabetes use insulin pumps, whereas the figure for the UK as a whole is 2 per cent. The disparity is even starker if we compare the situation in Scotland with that in other EU countries, where the figure ranges between 10 and 20 per cent. In the United States, too, the figure approaches the 20 per cent mark.
As other members have said, there are wide variances between the rates in different health board areas. There are more than 5,000 sufferers of type 1 diabetes in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board area, but only 31 of them use insulin pumps, which equates to a rate of 0.6 per cent. The rate in Lanarkshire, too, where only 21 out of more than 3,000 sufferers use insulin pumps, is only 0.6 per cent, which is well below the Scottish average and even further below the UK average. It is clear that urgent action is required. It is important that we raise the standard. I endorse Richard Simpson's suggestion that we should try to raise the level of insulin pump usage to 2.5 per cent across Scotland.
The provision of an insulin pump costs about £1,600 a year, whereas injections cost about £500 a year, but as Karen Whitefield and David Stewart said, the use of pumps can result in the NHS recouping £23,000 over two years because type 1 diabetes sufferers can go on to suffer from heart disease, stroke, kidney problems and blindness, which has an impact throughout the service. The use of insulin pumps to tackle type 1 diabetes has two main advantages: it improves people's health and it reduces the long-term strain on the NHS.
I congratulate David Stewart on raising this issue. He has helped to raise its profile, which I hope will help diabetes sufferers and have long-term benefits for the nation's health.
As Nanette Milne said, type 1 diabetes is an extremely serious issue in Scotland, given the high incidence of the condition here—the third highest in the world. We have about 197,000 sufferers of diabetes, more than 26,000, or 15 per cent, of whom have type 1 diabetes. That is an extremely large number.
As other members have said, the condition has a significant impact on young people, 35 per 100,000 of whom are affected by it. That has an impact not only on their lives, but on those of their families and on the support that the NHS provides through treatment of continuing illnesses.
It is clear that the use of insulin pumps can make the treatment of type 1 diabetes more effective, in that it can help people to manage their condition, make them more disciplined and contribute to an improved quality of life. The disparity between the use of insulin pumps in Scotland and in the rest of the UK and internationally is a concern. About 1 per cent of people in Scotland who have type 1 diabetes use insulin pumps, whereas the figure for the UK as a whole is 2 per cent. The disparity is even starker if we compare the situation in Scotland with that in other EU countries, where the figure ranges between 10 and 20 per cent. In the United States, too, the figure approaches the 20 per cent mark.
As other members have said, there are wide variances between the rates in different health board areas. There are more than 5,000 sufferers of type 1 diabetes in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board area, but only 31 of them use insulin pumps, which equates to a rate of 0.6 per cent. The rate in Lanarkshire, too, where only 21 out of more than 3,000 sufferers use insulin pumps, is only 0.6 per cent, which is well below the Scottish average and even further below the UK average. It is clear that urgent action is required. It is important that we raise the standard. I endorse Richard Simpson's suggestion that we should try to raise the level of insulin pump usage to 2.5 per cent across Scotland.
The provision of an insulin pump costs about £1,600 a year, whereas injections cost about £500 a year, but as Karen Whitefield and David Stewart said, the use of pumps can result in the NHS recouping £23,000 over two years because type 1 diabetes sufferers can go on to suffer from heart disease, stroke, kidney problems and blindness, which has an impact throughout the service. The use of insulin pumps to tackle type 1 diabetes has two main advantages: it improves people's health and it reduces the long-term strain on the NHS.
I congratulate David Stewart on raising this issue. He has helped to raise its profile, which I hope will help diabetes sufferers and have long-term benefits for the nation's health.
In the same item of business
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Alasdair Morgan):
SNP
The final item of business is a members' business debate on motion S3M-1888, in the name of David Stewart, on increasing access to insulin pumps. The debate ...
Motion debated,
That the Parliament notes the considerable benefits that insulin pumps have for diabetics to help them to manage their condition; notes with concern the curr...
David Stewart (Highlands and Islands) (Lab):
Lab
I welcome the opportunity to debate increased access to insulin pumps specifically, but also the bigger picture of diabetes and its role in health care manag...
Nanette Milne (North East Scotland) (Con):
Con
I am pleased to take part in the debate and I commend David Stewart on lodging the motion. Since I entered Parliament five years ago, my focus and that of ma...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
SNP
I am sorry—I do not want to be a spoilsport, and I should have said this earlier—but applause from the public gallery is not permitted.
Karen Whitefield (Airdrie and Shotts) (Lab):
Lab
I welcome the opportunity to speak in this evening's debate and congratulate David Stewart on securing a members' business debate on this important topic.Som...
Dr Richard Simpson (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab):
Lab
I, too, congratulate David Stewart on securing this debate. I am slightly disappointed that there are not more members in the chamber—indeed, one party is no...
James Kelly (Glasgow Rutherglen) (Lab):
Lab
I welcome the opportunity to take part in this evening's debate on the provision of insulin pumps and congratulate David Stewart on bringing the issue to the...
The Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing (Nicola Sturgeon):
SNP
I thank David Stewart for bringing the issue to the chamber, and I thank those in the public gallery who have attended to hear the debate. Like other members...
Cathy Jamieson (Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley) (Lab):
Lab
We heard during the debate of the poor figures for Ayrshire and Arran. Given that, does the cabinet secretary feel it appropriate to get in touch specificall...
Nicola Sturgeon:
SNP
I am always happy to follow up issues individually with health boards, and I will return to the issue of variability across boards in a minute.As members are...
Meeting closed at 17:42.