Chamber
Plenary, 16 Jun 2004
16 Jun 2004 · S2 · Plenary
Item of business
Local Government Finance Review
I reassure the Rev Alistair Morrison that his voice was heard loud and clear, despite the fact that the microphone was not working too well.
We made a commitment in the partnership agreement to set up an independent review of local government finance. I am happy today to announce the remit of that independent review and I will confirm the membership of the review team to the Parliament in due course.
The support that we give to local government demonstrates that we are committed to the delivery of high-quality public services. We know that the people of Scotland deserve and expect services that are of the highest possible quality. They deserve and expect effective local services that are locally delivered by democratically accountable local councils. We have made a commitment to reform and modernisation and we have secured significant improvements in public service delivery through distributing record levels of resources to local government.
However, that is only part of the story. Around a fifth of local authority net revenue comes directly to local authorities from council tax payers. We all strive for a system of local tax that is as fair and reliable and as predictable and stable as possible and we need to ensure that we strike the right balance for the taxpayer and for local authorities.
It is fair to say that there are concerns about the current council tax system. Now is an appropriate time for a review. The review matters to the people who pay council tax, to local authorities and to the many services upon which we all depend. Local taxation pays for schools, for services for the elderly and the most vulnerable and for services such as the maintenance of roads, street lighting and refuse collection. Let us face facts: no one likes paying tax and any form of taxation has its critics. However, we must also face the fact that taxation is required to fund the services on which we, our families and our communities rely.
We will listen to what the review has to say and we will act. The review has a challenging remit. All the taxation alternatives are up for consideration. Each of the parties in the Parliament has a different position, as do members of the local government and business communities. The review will examine each of these alternatives: the council tax in its current form; a reformed council tax; a local income tax with a rate that is set locally; a local income tax with a rate that is set nationally; a land value tax; and options for local business taxation.
The review will be independent of the Executive. It will be free to consider the proposals that are put to it by the various parties that are represented in the Parliament and by other interested groups. It will include any model of local taxation that it considers appropriate. Each alternative will be examined carefully and rigorously; its strengths and weaknesses will be identified and the practicalities and wider economic impact of any changes will be considered in depth.
Now is the time for detail and hard work. I have given the independent review the task of considering each proposed tax against a defined set of criteria. It will consider the effect of the proposed tax on economic growth, because a successful economy is key to Scotland's future prosperity and first-class public services are possible only in a successful economy. It is vital that the wider economic impact of any form of taxation is fully considered. We must not forget that high taxes, whether they are levied nationally or locally, have an impact on the economy, on business and, of course, on hard-working families.
The review will consider whether the proposed tax takes account of ability to pay and is fair. We need to be sure that the amount of tax that individuals pay is reasonable given their circumstances.
The review will also consider how easy the tax would be to collect, whether income could effectively be predicted and whether the system would be stable. It will consider what the shift to a new system would involve. It is vital that we get those matters right for local authorities, which require stable funding if they are to provide schools, social care and roads, to take cognisance of changing needs and to plan effectively for the future of their communities.
The review will consider the collection cost of the proposed tax and who would collect it. The administration of council tax, including council tax benefit, has an obvious cost for local authorities, but what would be the cost of administering the alternatives? For example, the Inland Revenue and businesses that have Scottish employees might incur additional costs.
The review will consider the impact of any proposed change on the relationship between the tax and the benefits system. Under the current council tax system around a quarter of households receive council tax benefit at a cost of about £300 million to the Department for Work and Pensions. What would happen to that under a new system?
The review will also consider the impact of any proposed change on the relative contributions of local and national taxation to paying for local services. As I said, council tax payers currently contribute about a fifth of net revenue. Would that change under any reformed system?
The independent review will test each proposed tax. It will identify the strengths and weaknesses of each and it will make recommendations. We will examine its conclusions carefully.
As we all know, local government finance is complex. However, we must remember that the decisions that we take have major implications for the individuals, families and communities who receive and pay for council services. Any taxation system—local or national—will have implications for our economy and our businesses.
We know that it is not possible to look at local taxation in isolation—nor would we want to. Any change to local taxation will have wider implications for local government finance. I have therefore asked the independent review group to look at the implications for the rest of the distribution system; business rates; the mechanism for distributing grant between authorities; and the relationship of local taxation to domestic water and sewerage charges. Some issues are reserved to Westminster—council tax benefit for one.
Many will be keen to engage with the review and I am keen for them to do so. Only then will we have the full, thorough and independent review that we want. The remit of the independent review group is available from the Scottish Parliament information centre staff at the back of the chamber and it will be circulated to all local authorities today. It is also available on the Scottish Executive website.
The independent review of local government finance will have implications for every single person and business in Scotland. We all deserve a system of taxation that is as fair as we can make it, and we all deserve local authority services of the highest possible quality. The review will be comprehensive and it will represent the most serious consideration of local taxation in Scotland. I challenge this Parliament and the people of Scotland to engage with the review.
We made a commitment in the partnership agreement to set up an independent review of local government finance. I am happy today to announce the remit of that independent review and I will confirm the membership of the review team to the Parliament in due course.
The support that we give to local government demonstrates that we are committed to the delivery of high-quality public services. We know that the people of Scotland deserve and expect services that are of the highest possible quality. They deserve and expect effective local services that are locally delivered by democratically accountable local councils. We have made a commitment to reform and modernisation and we have secured significant improvements in public service delivery through distributing record levels of resources to local government.
However, that is only part of the story. Around a fifth of local authority net revenue comes directly to local authorities from council tax payers. We all strive for a system of local tax that is as fair and reliable and as predictable and stable as possible and we need to ensure that we strike the right balance for the taxpayer and for local authorities.
It is fair to say that there are concerns about the current council tax system. Now is an appropriate time for a review. The review matters to the people who pay council tax, to local authorities and to the many services upon which we all depend. Local taxation pays for schools, for services for the elderly and the most vulnerable and for services such as the maintenance of roads, street lighting and refuse collection. Let us face facts: no one likes paying tax and any form of taxation has its critics. However, we must also face the fact that taxation is required to fund the services on which we, our families and our communities rely.
We will listen to what the review has to say and we will act. The review has a challenging remit. All the taxation alternatives are up for consideration. Each of the parties in the Parliament has a different position, as do members of the local government and business communities. The review will examine each of these alternatives: the council tax in its current form; a reformed council tax; a local income tax with a rate that is set locally; a local income tax with a rate that is set nationally; a land value tax; and options for local business taxation.
The review will be independent of the Executive. It will be free to consider the proposals that are put to it by the various parties that are represented in the Parliament and by other interested groups. It will include any model of local taxation that it considers appropriate. Each alternative will be examined carefully and rigorously; its strengths and weaknesses will be identified and the practicalities and wider economic impact of any changes will be considered in depth.
Now is the time for detail and hard work. I have given the independent review the task of considering each proposed tax against a defined set of criteria. It will consider the effect of the proposed tax on economic growth, because a successful economy is key to Scotland's future prosperity and first-class public services are possible only in a successful economy. It is vital that the wider economic impact of any form of taxation is fully considered. We must not forget that high taxes, whether they are levied nationally or locally, have an impact on the economy, on business and, of course, on hard-working families.
The review will consider whether the proposed tax takes account of ability to pay and is fair. We need to be sure that the amount of tax that individuals pay is reasonable given their circumstances.
The review will also consider how easy the tax would be to collect, whether income could effectively be predicted and whether the system would be stable. It will consider what the shift to a new system would involve. It is vital that we get those matters right for local authorities, which require stable funding if they are to provide schools, social care and roads, to take cognisance of changing needs and to plan effectively for the future of their communities.
The review will consider the collection cost of the proposed tax and who would collect it. The administration of council tax, including council tax benefit, has an obvious cost for local authorities, but what would be the cost of administering the alternatives? For example, the Inland Revenue and businesses that have Scottish employees might incur additional costs.
The review will consider the impact of any proposed change on the relationship between the tax and the benefits system. Under the current council tax system around a quarter of households receive council tax benefit at a cost of about £300 million to the Department for Work and Pensions. What would happen to that under a new system?
The review will also consider the impact of any proposed change on the relative contributions of local and national taxation to paying for local services. As I said, council tax payers currently contribute about a fifth of net revenue. Would that change under any reformed system?
The independent review will test each proposed tax. It will identify the strengths and weaknesses of each and it will make recommendations. We will examine its conclusions carefully.
As we all know, local government finance is complex. However, we must remember that the decisions that we take have major implications for the individuals, families and communities who receive and pay for council services. Any taxation system—local or national—will have implications for our economy and our businesses.
We know that it is not possible to look at local taxation in isolation—nor would we want to. Any change to local taxation will have wider implications for local government finance. I have therefore asked the independent review group to look at the implications for the rest of the distribution system; business rates; the mechanism for distributing grant between authorities; and the relationship of local taxation to domestic water and sewerage charges. Some issues are reserved to Westminster—council tax benefit for one.
Many will be keen to engage with the review and I am keen for them to do so. Only then will we have the full, thorough and independent review that we want. The remit of the independent review group is available from the Scottish Parliament information centre staff at the back of the chamber and it will be circulated to all local authorities today. It is also available on the Scottish Executive website.
The independent review of local government finance will have implications for every single person and business in Scotland. We all deserve a system of taxation that is as fair as we can make it, and we all deserve local authority services of the highest possible quality. The review will be comprehensive and it will represent the most serious consideration of local taxation in Scotland. I challenge this Parliament and the people of Scotland to engage with the review.
In the same item of business
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Murray Tosh):
Con
The next item of business is a statement by Andy Kerr, on the local government finance review. The minister will take questions at the end of his statement a...
The Minister for Finance and Public Services (Mr Andy Kerr):
Lab
I reassure the Rev Alistair Morrison that his voice was heard loud and clear, despite the fact that the microphone was not working too well.We made a commitm...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
Con
The minister will now take questions on the statement; I will allow around 20 minutes.
Fergus Ewing (Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber) (SNP):
SNP
I thank the minister for personally providing me with a copy of the statement just before the start of these proceedings. The minister knows that the Scottis...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
Quite correctly, I am limited in how I can respond to many of the points that Fergus Ewing has raised. On the day of the setting up of an independent review,...
Mr Brian Monteith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con):
Con
On behalf of the real Opposition, I thank the minister for providing an early copy of his statement. The fact that we are able to have two statements today m...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
I refer the member to the Labour Party manifesto, which probably provides a greater insight on such matters than anything else. That keeps me from any danger...
Jeremy Purvis (Tweeddale, Ettrick and Lauderdale) (LD):
LD
Will the minister provide an answer for a constituent of mine who is a pensioner and who came to an advice surgery? My constituent has a fixed income, which ...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
The points that the member raises will clearly be part of the considerations. If not, the member's constituent may raise the point directly, or the member ma...
Mark Ballard (Lothians) (Green):
Green
I welcome the establishment of an independent review and the fact that it will consider systems that are based on taxation of the value of land, alongside ot...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
I am sure that it will do so, because I am sure that the member, if not others, will raise that matter with the review team. I recognise the member's point t...
Tommy Sheridan (Glasgow) (SSP):
SSP
I am sure that the people of Scotland will welcome today's announcement because—I hope—it is the beginning of the end of the unfair Tory council tax. I am di...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
I will do my best to respond to all those points. If I miss one out I will get back to the member later. First, I am not in favour of a dictatorial approach ...
Maureen Macmillan (Highlands and Islands) (Lab):
Lab
I welcome the review of the council tax, but I ask the minister to be mindful of the fact that we are still waiting to hear what is going to happen to counci...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
I share that hope. Tavish Scott and I are trying to expedite the matter as quickly as possible. As I have said to the Parliament in the past, there is a degr...
Tricia Marwick (Mid Scotland and Fife) (SNP):
SNP
In 1999, the McIntosh commission recommended that there should be an independent review of local government finance, but the Executive at that time refused t...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
First of all, the Executive said that the review would be a thorough examination of Scotland's local taxation system. It has implications well beyond local g...
Bristow Muldoon (Livingston) (Lab):
Lab
I welcome the minister's statement that the review will be required to take into account the impact on the Scottish economy of any change in the taxation sys...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
I will not go there, with due respect. Why intrude on pain?It is critical that, as part of the review, we understand the implications of what we do in future...
Iain Smith (North East Fife) (LD):
LD
I welcome the minister's statement and the setting up of the review. Local government has been calling for one for as long as I can remember—which is longer ...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
The questions are not over yet, but—dare I say it—there has been little criticism of the core areas that the review team will examine. That suggests that, wh...
Des McNulty (Clydebank and Milngavie) (Lab):
Lab
I ask that the review body be asked to make an early estimate of the costs of introducing an income tax to replace the council tax, because we have had a var...
Mr Kerr:
Lab
My job is to listen to the review team's findings, which will come after long evidence taking and consideration of all the matters that members have raised t...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
Con
My regrets go to those members whose names are still on my screen, but we must now go to the next item of business.