Chamber
Plenary, 05 Mar 2003
05 Mar 2003 · S1 · Plenary
Item of business
Subordinate Legislation
Fishing Vessels (Decommissioning) (Scotland) Scheme 2003<br />Sea Fishing (Transitional Support) (Scotland) (No 2) Scheme 2003
I want to continue with my speech.
The SNP's amendment on the decommissioning scheme would ensure that any such scheme would be sensible. The minister must do all that he can to ensure that it is not just the banks that benefit from decommissioning. We cannot neglect the interests of the crews. That happened last time, and we must address that issue this time. We must ensure that all the debts to the onshore sector are paid—they were not covered last time, either. We should also ensure that any boats that are decommissioned are available for conversion purposes to help to give onshore businesses more business.
We must examine the issue of quota. We must ensure that we protect the birthright of our fishing communities for the sake of the future of the industry. Last month, the minister said in the chamber that he was
"looking carefully at the rules and regulations that govern the transfer of quota".—[Official Report, 19 February 2003; c 18288.]
He should have said today what progress he has made, because that is a crucial issue. In that debate on 19 February, he also told the chamber that
"our view is that decommissioning is a rational economic response."—[Official Report, 19 February 2003; c 18286.]
He then went on to talk about the enhanced opportunities for fishermen who remain in the industry.
Yesterday, the minister told the Rural Development Committee that decommissioning would increase the profitability of the remaining vessels, but he never once—either during the previous debate or at yesterday's committee meeting—got round to explaining how the vessels that choose to remain in the industry would get to enjoy the quota from the decommissioned vessels. Even if they did get that quota, he cannot explain how they would get more days to allow them to fish that quota. The real fear is that the £40 million earmarked by the minister will take out virtually all the 180 remaining dedicated white-fish vessels. However, the quota will remain with the boat owners and will not benefit the remaining vessels in the industry.
The minister keeps sending out mixed messages. Are we honestly to believe that a crisis that has arisen out of plans to save the cod will lead him to choose prawn boats for decommissioning, when prawn stocks are healthy?
The SNP's amendment on the decommissioning scheme would ensure that any such scheme would be sensible. The minister must do all that he can to ensure that it is not just the banks that benefit from decommissioning. We cannot neglect the interests of the crews. That happened last time, and we must address that issue this time. We must ensure that all the debts to the onshore sector are paid—they were not covered last time, either. We should also ensure that any boats that are decommissioned are available for conversion purposes to help to give onshore businesses more business.
We must examine the issue of quota. We must ensure that we protect the birthright of our fishing communities for the sake of the future of the industry. Last month, the minister said in the chamber that he was
"looking carefully at the rules and regulations that govern the transfer of quota".—[Official Report, 19 February 2003; c 18288.]
He should have said today what progress he has made, because that is a crucial issue. In that debate on 19 February, he also told the chamber that
"our view is that decommissioning is a rational economic response."—[Official Report, 19 February 2003; c 18286.]
He then went on to talk about the enhanced opportunities for fishermen who remain in the industry.
Yesterday, the minister told the Rural Development Committee that decommissioning would increase the profitability of the remaining vessels, but he never once—either during the previous debate or at yesterday's committee meeting—got round to explaining how the vessels that choose to remain in the industry would get to enjoy the quota from the decommissioned vessels. Even if they did get that quota, he cannot explain how they would get more days to allow them to fish that quota. The real fear is that the £40 million earmarked by the minister will take out virtually all the 180 remaining dedicated white-fish vessels. However, the quota will remain with the boat owners and will not benefit the remaining vessels in the industry.
The minister keeps sending out mixed messages. Are we honestly to believe that a crisis that has arisen out of plans to save the cod will lead him to choose prawn boats for decommissioning, when prawn stocks are healthy?
In the same item of business
The Minister for Environment and Rural Development (Ross Finnie):
LD
In the short time that the Presiding Officer's announcement gave me, I added a little theological content to my speech, so that members will not feel deprive...
Phil Gallie (South of Scotland) (Con):
Con
The minister used the word "restructuring", but is it not the case that we are talking about destructuring, given the extent of decommissioning that he expec...
Ross Finnie:
LD
That is a highly excitable and, if I might say so, wholly unfounded intervention. We are talking about decommissioning to the extent of 15 per cent of effort...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber) (SNP):
SNP
Will the minister take an intervention?
Ross Finnie:
LD
I shall make a little progress and then I shall take another intervention.I turn to the two instruments for debate, beginning with the Fishing Vessels (Decom...
Richard Lochhead (North-East Scotland) (SNP):
SNP
The minister will recall that the last time that a decommissioning scheme went through the Parliament, there was huge concern about the fact that many of the...
Ross Finnie:
LD
I shall come on to the detail of that. In general terms, let us be absolutely clear that, essentially, there has to be a contract between the Executive and t...
Richard Lochhead:
SNP
The minister talks about transitional aid to get the industry through the difficult period ahead. The signs that we are getting from the European Commission ...
Ross Finnie:
LD
We must address the question that is before us today. We have introduced a package, we have discussed it and we have allocated funds for it. We are in danger...
Mrs Margaret Ewing (Moray) (SNP):
SNP
Will the minister take an intervention?
Ross Finnie:
LD
No. I will make one more point. It is important that, as set out in SSI 2003/116, the compensation formula will reflect vessels' historic activity. As I expl...
Fergus Ewing:
SNP
We all understand and agree with the objectives that the minister has described. Does he accept that there is almost unanimous agreement in the industry that...
Ross Finnie:
LD
The member said that the funding "is available", but that is not accurate, as it has not yet been approved by the Council of Ministers and the European Parli...
Mrs Margaret Ewing:
SNP
In relation to the European scheme, what have the Scottish Executive and the Westminster Government done to ensure that support is given to the budget-line a...
Ross Finnie:
LD
All I know is that we have indicated that if such a scheme were available, we would be genuinely interested in it. It is for the UK ministers to pursue the m...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Mr Murray Tosh):
Con
Amendments S1M-3958.1 and S1M-3959.1 are in the name of Richard Lochhead.
Richard Lochhead (North-East Scotland) (SNP):
SNP
This morning's events certainly reinforce the Scottish National Party's view that the Parliament does not have appropriate powers to deliver for Scotland's f...
Mr Mike Rumbles (West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) (LD):
LD
Is not Richard Lochhead's amendment somewhat disingenuous? I know for a fact that he misrepresents the views of members of the Rural Development Committee. H...
The Deputy Presiding Officer:
Con
You are repeating yourself, Mr Rumbles.
Richard Lochhead:
SNP
If that is the best that the member for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine can come up with, I suggest that he sit on his backside for the rest of the debate....
Rhona Brankin (Midlothian) (Lab):
Lab
The member said that other countries were building new vessels. If the SNP were in power, would it subsidise fishermen to do that at this juncture?
Richard Lochhead:
SNP
One thing that the SNP would not do is destroy the vast bulk of our own fishing fleet.Over the past three years, the Executive has introduced two aid package...
Ross Finnie:
LD
Would it not be more accurate to say that we have actually spent 85 per cent trying to conserve stocks so that there is a sustainable fishing industry?
Richard Lochhead:
SNP
One does not conserve the fishing industry by destroying it.The minister says that he needs to scrap vessels in order to secure two of the 15 days a month at...
Mr Rumbles:
LD
Disgraceful.
Richard Lochhead:
SNP
Despite what Mike Rumbles says, it is there in black and white in the committee's report, which was published last week.
Iain Smith (North-East Fife) (LD):
LD
Will Richard Lochhead give way?
Richard Lochhead:
SNP
I want to continue with my speech.The SNP's amendment on the decommissioning scheme would ensure that any such scheme would be sensible. The minister must do...
Ross Finnie:
LD
On what basis does the member tell us that the 180 dedicated white-fish vessels amount to only 15 per cent of Scotland's fishing effort on cod?
Richard Lochhead:
SNP
If the minister dedicates £40 million to decommissioning and gives no alternative to the fleet but bankruptcy, there will be applications for decommissioning...