Committee
Justice 2 Committee, 18 Mar 2003
18 Mar 2003 · S1 · Justice 2 Committee
Item of business
Petitions
Judiciary (Freemasons) (PE306)
I concur.
In the same item of business
The Convener:
Lab
Petition PE306 is on freemasonry and the judiciary. The committee decided that it did not want to take further action, but invited the petitioner to provide ...
Mr Hamilton:
SNP
I am content that the issue has been exhausted.
Bill Aitken:
Con
I concur.
The Convener:
Lab
Unless any other member is otherwise minded, I do not propose to refer the petition back to the Public Petitions Committee.There is one question that I need ...
Stewart Stevenson:
SNP
On whose shoulders would the liability lie in law if we were to publish the evidence in its entirety?
Gillian Baxendine:
My understanding is that a number of issues arise, one of which is possible defamation. The Parliament is protected in relation to that. Nevertheless, it wou...
Stewart Stevenson:
SNP
I therefore propose that, based on the legal opinion, the evidence be edited or those parts that relate to potential breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 b...
Gillian Baxendine:
To be clear, my understanding is that if the evidence is published as a parliamentary proceeding, the protection extends to the petitioner as well.
Stewart Stevenson:
SNP
In that case, I recommend non-publication.
Mr Hamilton:
SNP
We have to be careful about this. My take on it is that to publish half the paper would be to stoke the fire still further. I suspect that we should simply s...
The Convener:
Lab
I am sympathetic to the principle of the petition, but the committee decided that it was not, and that is the status of the petition at the moment. We invite...
Mr Hamilton:
SNP
The point is that if we make an active choice to extend parliamentary privilege to something that we are sceptical about, we do a disservice.
The Convener:
Lab
So the committee is agreed that we will not publish the evidence.In closing our last meeting, I wish to put on record my thanks to all members of the committ...
Stewart Stevenson:
SNP
Hear, hear.
The Convener:
Lab
They have managed to do the impossible sometimes in deciphering all the decisions that we have made. I thank them very much. Perhaps when the meeting closes ...
Bill Aitken:
Con
Before we close the meeting, it would be appropriate to associate myself with your comments. This has been a tremendously good committee. We have frequently ...
The Convener:
Lab
Thank you.
Stewart Stevenson:
SNP
I would like to reflect on what has been said by my two colleagues and political rivals, and agree with them that the committee has worked well. I have thoro...
The Convener:
Lab
It is amazing the things that we have learned about one another, and the things that I have learned about you, Stewart, and all the jobs that you have had. S...
Bill Aitken:
Con
I was always just worried that he had a problem holding down a steady job.
The Convener:
Lab
I also thank the official report. I cannot imagine what it must be like keeping up with what members say. Thank you.
Meeting closed at 12:31.