Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,096,445
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,096,445 contributions in session S6, 13 May 2026 – 12 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 3,975. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 11 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Committee

Justice 2 Committee, 12 Dec 2001

12 Dec 2001 · S1 · Justice 2 Committee
Item of business
Sexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
In commenting on amendment 20, in the name of Bill Aitken, I shall focus particularly on proposed subsection (4A), paragraph (c), to which the minister referred. It says that the conditions are:"that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the quality of evidence … is likely to be diminished if the cross-examination is conducted by the accused in person and likely to be improved if an order is made".That cuts right across the grain of the intention of the bill, and gives paramouncy to the quality of evidence over the protection of a vulnerable witness. On those grounds alone, I do not believe that we can agree to amendment 20.

In the same item of business

The Convener: Lab
Item 3 is stage 2 of the Sexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Bill. I welcome Richard Simpson, the new Deputy Minister for Justice, to the com...
Section 1—Prohibition of personal conduct of defence in cases of certain sexual offences
The Convener: Lab
I call amendment 1, which is grouped with amendments 18, 19, 2, 30 and 15.
The Deputy Minister for Justice (Dr Richard Simpson): Lab
Before I talk to the amendments, I thank you for your forbearance, convener, with regard to the letter that we wrote to you about holding back the amendments...
Bill Aitken (Glasgow) (Con): Con
The issues here are fairly straightforward. Having been convinced of the efficacy of section 1 of the proposed legislation, I am seeking to make it more effe...
Mrs Margaret Ewing (Moray) (SNP): SNP
Amendment 30 has two parts. The first part is to stop the provisions that prevent the accused from representing himself from applying to summary cases. It se...
Scott Barrie (Dunfermline West) (Lab): Lab
I would like the minister to clarify amendment 2, as I am not very au fait with the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995. Was the change to the d...
Dr Simpson:
Yes.
Scott Barrie: Lab
That is all that I needed to know.
The Convener: Lab
The committee may want to be assured that amendment 2 deals with the points that were made to us by the Equality Network, which claims that the bill as it st...
Dr Simpson:
I would be happy to.Amendment 18, in the name of Bill Aitken, seeks to add shameless indecency to the list of offences that are covered by the bill, so that ...
Amendment 1 agreed to.
The Convener: Lab
Amendment 18 was debated with amendment 1. Does Bill Aitken wish to move the amendment?
Bill Aitken: Con
Having heard the minister, I will not move amendment 18, but I reserve my position for stage 3 until I have checked the matter.
Amendment 18 not moved.
Amendment 19 moved—Bill Aitken—and agreed to.
Amendment 2 moved—Dr Richard Simpson—and agreed to.
The Convener: Lab
Amendment 3 is grouped with amendments 20, 4, 26 and 27. If amendment 20 is agreed to, amendment 4 will be pre-empted.
Dr Simpson:
Amendments 3 and 4 are tidying amendments. Proposed section 288C(2) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, which section 1 of the bill will insert, c...
Bill Aitken: Con
I disagree with the minister. Amendment 20 is well conceived and would provide a necessary part of the bill. To some extent, it seeks clarification of the te...
Stewart Stevenson (Banff and Buchan) (SNP): SNP
In commenting on amendment 20, in the name of Bill Aitken, I shall focus particularly on proposed subsection (4A), paragraph (c), to which the minister refer...
Scott Barrie: Lab
I concur with what Stewart Stevenson said. Amendment 20 strikes against what the bill intends to do. We should be wary of that. Anything that promotes the qu...
The Convener: Lab
I want to make a few comments in opposition to amendment 20.The committee thought long and hard about the way in which complainers should be protected. We sp...
Dr Simpson:
In our view, the bill should cover all sexual offences. The only relevant question, therefore, is whether the offence is a sexual one. Amendment 20 would mea...
Amendment 3 agreed to.
Amendment 20 moved—Bill Aitken.
The Convener: Lab
The question is, that amendment 20 be agreed to. Are we agreed?
Members:
No.
The Convener: Lab
There will be a division.
ForAitken, Bill (Glasgow) (Con)AgainstBarrie, Scott (Dunfermline West) (Lab)Ewing, Mrs Margaret (Moray) (SNP)Lyon, George (Argyll and Bute) (LD)McNeill, Paul...