Official Report search · Parliament Workbench

Committee

Education and Gaelic Committee 23 June 2026 [Draft]

23 Jun 2026 · S7 · Education and Gaelic Committee

Item of business

Priorities

Ross, Angela Reform Edinburgh and Lothians East Watch on SPTV

We want to focus on the curriculum for excellence, how it is being delivered and where some of the shortfalls are, particularly around the structure of the curriculum itself. I have a particular interest in that, given some of the previous work that I have done.The national curriculum that is used in England is much more knowledge based, which is similar to the Scottish system that we used to use. We have gone to a more skills-based approach, which needs to be integrated as part of the curriculum. However, we need to assess what is working in schools such as Jordanhill school, which has done a good job of embedding knowledge back into the curriculum. It is about looking at where we can get merit from analysing that success.However, we can assess progress and performance in schools only if we have the appropriate surveys and assessment structure in place. It is about understanding how we measure where our children are and what level they are at. There is possibly a need to look at ages and stages, which, when I have investigated it, is an area that seems to be a little bit loose. It is sort of the case that a child gets to their level when they get to it, which is fair enough. However, we need to be able to assess that as well as our international performance—that goes to Duncan Dunlop’s point—so that we are able to critique where we are and how we are doing, because that will give us the feedback that we need to improve. How we can potentially improve on that is one area.Another area to look at is joining the dots up an awful lot more. Our education system tends to be quite siloed, and people who are going through it need to see clear pathways. Although there needs to be flexibility to switch pathways, I would ask whether we can look at horizon thinking. Can we look at joining up the structure, so that when people progress, there are no cliff edges and there is clear progress? That might be going into further education opportunities, apprenticeships or university, but there should be an end goal, a career and an experience outside in life that people can embrace because they have chosen the correct options as they have gone along. When I went through that experience, I thought, “I have finished school, now what? I have finished university, now what?” It did not seem very joined up, and we could do better in those areas.On apprenticeships, we need to look at how we ring fence the funding for that and ensure that it is spent in the correct way. That might mean looking more at enterprise and commercial opportunities and perhaps ensuring that there is the opportunity to look at professional development in universities. Perhaps there could be a year in a university or college course when people were out working—doing a practical, physical job or a job in a professional sphere—to get experience and explore future work options. It is about joining up those activities.STEM is important, but perhaps we should call it STEAM, because we want to include the arts and we want to encourage critical thinking. This is about how people think, rather than what they think, and how they can use that in life. It is about giving them the skills to be creative and explore innovation. Perhaps that means weaving innovation into our education system more, so that we are really thinking about the opportunities. As Scots, we are great at coming up with creative and innovative ideas; we just need the space to be able to do so.

Search Hansard contributions

Education and Gaelic Committee 23 June 2026 [Draft]

In the same item of business