Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
14
Parties on record
2,096,833
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,096,833 contributions in session S6, 11 May 2026 – 10 Jun 2026. Latest 30 days: 2,655. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 09 Jun 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 04 February 2026

04 Feb 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Parliamentary Bureau Motions

I touched on that. I am sorry if I have misled the Parliament. The details of what such an order might contain are still being worked through. Of course, the situation might arise at stage 3—although I hope it will not—in which other amendments would be lodged that would raise issues that would have to be covered by the section 104 order.

If we proceed by way of a section 104 order, that will require the bill to be amended to remove provisions that would then be dealt with through the order after royal assent, should the bill pass. The removal of provisions would be necessary in order to bring the bill within competence before the stage 3 vote as, if the bill is passed outside of competence, there is a strong likelihood of it being referred to the Supreme Court. With that in mind, as I said earlier, members may want to be mindful of the risks of new provisions being included through amendments at stage 3 that would take the bill further outside legislative competence.

The Scottish Government recognises the challenges that this poses for MSPs, particularly given the importance of the areas that are being discussed for removal: namely provisions related to training, qualifications and experience of health professionals; and employment duties, rights and protections. However, the Parliament has a duty to ensure that any bill that it passes is within competence, which is what we have set out to do.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is consideration of Parliamentary Bureau motion S6M-20670, on approval of a statutory instrument.Motion moved,That the Parliament a...
Edward Mountain (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I rise to speak to the motion. This is a complicated matter involving an SI in relation to the Scotland Act 1998. I believe, as do some in the UK Parliament,...
Alasdair Allan (Na h-Eileanan an Iar) (SNP) SNP
I believe that this is a technical measure. On the wider procedural issues, does the member have a view on what options would be open to this Parliament in t...
Edward Mountain Con
That may be beyond my exact knowledge of this matter. My point is that I do not see how the Scottish Parliament can pass a bill that we are not competent to ...
The Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans (Graeme Dey) SNP
Although I utterly respect Edward Mountain’s perspective on the matter of assisted dying, I gently remind him that we are seeking tonight not to pass the bil...
Bob Doris (Glasgow Maryhill and Springburn) (SNP) SNP
On a technical issue, if the bill was to pass at stage 3 and then a future Scottish Parliament wished to amend it further in this area, would that require a ...
Graeme Dey SNP
We are now getting quite far ahead of ourselves, but I hope that I will cover that point as I go on. To be absolutely clear, the time limit applies only to t...
Edward Mountain Con
I thank the minister for giving way. I am trying to prompt him—I hope—to say whether this is the only bit of the bill that will require a section 30 order. A...
Graeme Dey SNP
As I think the member knows, a further process—a section 104 order—would have to be undertaken further down the line. However, in the context of getting the ...
Jeremy Balfour (Lothian) (Ind) Ind
Will the minister take an intervention?
Graeme Dey SNP
I will, if I can just finish my point.With that in mind, the Government opted to focus its attention on the section 30 order in the first instance, given tha...
Jeremy Balfour Ind
The minister may have covered it, but I would like to clarify the point. Before the Parliament votes on stage 3, will we have clarity on what will be in the ...
Graeme Dey SNP
My understanding is that the discussions with the UK Government on what will be contained in that order are on-going, with a view to ensuring that the Parlia...
Stuart McMillan (Greenock and Inverclyde) (SNP) SNP
Will the minister take a brief intervention?
Graeme Dey SNP
Do I have time, Presiding Officer?
The Presiding Officer NPA
We have gone somewhat over the time for this item. I will allow a little more time. Mr McMillan may intervene briefly.
Stuart McMillan SNP
As members of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee will testify to, we have been told in the past that the dialogue related to a section 104 order d...
Graeme Dey SNP
I touched on that. I am sorry if I have misled the Parliament. The details of what such an order might contain are still being worked through. Of course, the...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The question on the motion will be put at decision time.18:13
The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is consideration of Parliamentary Bureau motion S6M-20671, on approval of a Scottish statutory instrument. I ask Graeme Dey, on beh...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The question on the motion will be put at decision time.