Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 24 March 2026 [Draft]

24 Mar 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3
Gilruth, Jenny SNP Mid Fife and Glenrothes Watch on SPTV

I thank Daniel Johnson for his commitment in bringing forward the legislation on restraint and seclusion that is before us today. I applaud his approach to working with the Government and I encourage more such good behaviour in the coming parliamentary session.

The bill has brought together parties from across the chamber, united by a clear and shared objective: to improve the lives of our children and young people. As we conclude these stage 3 proceedings, it is right to recognise the significant amount of work that has brought the bill to its final parliamentary stage. Families, campaigners, the Children and Young People's Commissioner, our teachers and school staff, the teaching trade unions and the Education, Children and Young People Committee have all approached the issue with seriousness and compassion.

I again pay tribute to the determined efforts of Beth Morrison and Kate Sanger, whose tenacious campaigning has ensured that children’s experiences remain firmly at the centre of this work. No children should have to experience what Calum Morrison and Kate’s daughter Laura went through in school. Beth and Kate have turned those traumatic experiences into a positive campaign to improve the lives of all our children, and were it not for them I am certain that we would not be having a stage 3 debate on a bill on restraint today.

As colleagues know, the Scottish Government’s position on the use of restraint and seclusion has been consistent throughout the passage of the bill. Restraint must only ever be used as a last resort to prevent injury. That principle, which underpinned the national guidance that was issued in 2024, remains central today.

The Scottish Government’s original intention was to conclude the review of our 2024 guidance before determining whether legislation was required. I confirm that, as we have heard from Mr Johnson, we published the review of the national guidance this morning. I thank all those who responded to the review and who have helped to implement the national guidance in our schools. Although the data that has been collected does not yet provide a full picture, as we also heard, we can clearly see that there is a higher prevalence of restraint and seclusion in our primary and special schools.

Progress is being made on professional learning to help support implementation. However, one year on from the implementation of the national guidance, there is clearly more work to be done to improve parental notifications and recording and to further support professional learning.

The review is perhaps itself evidence of the need to legislate in this space—there is a clear alignment between the review’s findings and the issues that Daniel Johnson seeks to address with his bill. That is why the Government will support the bill tonight. From the outset, the Government has seen the value in working constructively with Daniel Johnson to advance the bill, and that pragmatic, collaborative approach has been maintained throughout every stage.

The Parliament’s scrutiny has also been rigorous and thoughtful throughout the bill’s passage. The Education, Children and Young People Committee’s stage 1 report and members’ speeches in the stage 1 debate highlighted clear support for the bill’s general principles. However, the committee also highlighted many areas in which further clarity and precision were deemed to be essential if the bill is to work in practice for the schools and families that are affected by restraint.

As members have heard, I have been pleased to work collaboratively with Mr Johnson to strengthen the bill at stages 2 and 3 and to lay the groundwork for clear and effective implementation.

The support that Daniel Johnson and I have received from the Education, Children and Young People Committee and from across the chamber has reassured me that we have listened to and addressed the concerns that were raised at stage 1. As a result of Parliament’s close scrutiny, I believe that we have produced a stronger bill that is consistent with the initial intentions behind it.

The bill before Parliament today reflects that combined work of members, teachers, families and campaigners, and it represents a significant step forward in establishing a much clearer legal framework for the use of restraint and seclusion and for our rights-based approach to practice in our schools.

Should Parliament choose to pass the bill, the Government will focus on implementation. The creation of the new statutory guidance will be informed, of course, by the evidence that was gathered throughout the bill’s parliamentary progress and the findings from the guidance review.

I congratulate Daniel Johnson on navigating the legislation so successfully through Parliament. On the day before the dissolution of what has at times been a deeply divided Parliament, parties will instead come together to legislate in the best interests of Scotland’s children and young people.

As cabinet secretary, I have been proud to support along its way a bill that, as we all know, was driven from inception by the campaigning voices and tenacious spirit of Beth Morrison and Kate Sanger. At the end of the day, the bill is about Scotland’s bairns—for Calum, for Laura and for all of Scotland’s children.

15:11

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a debate on motion S6M-21120, in the name of Daniel Johnson, on the Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill at stage ...
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
I feel strongly that it is a basic human response that, when a child is in distress, hurt or injured, we want to help and protect them. That is one of the mo...
The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills (Jenny Gilruth) SNP
I thank Daniel Johnson for his commitment in bringing forward the legislation on restraint and seclusion that is before us today. I applaud his approach to w...
Miles Briggs (Lothian) (Con) Con
I, too, pay tribute to Daniel Johnson, who underestimates his role in this matter. Those of us who have attempted to take through or have taken through a pri...
Paul O’Kane (West Scotland) (Lab) Lab
There is a distinct air of the end of term all around us. There was a degree of chatter at the back of the chamber between the cabinet secretary and me and o...
Maggie Chapman (North East Scotland) (Green) Green
I am grateful to Daniel Johnson for his work on the bill, and I pay tribute to him for that, but we should reflect on why it took a member’s bill to get us t...
Willie Rennie (North East Fife) (LD) LD
I have met Beth Morrison on several occasions. I recall one particular occasion in the middle of winter in my office in Cupar. I said something that she disa...
Daniel Johnson Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Willie Rennie LD
Certainly.
Daniel Johnson Lab
Just to update Willie Rennie’s characterisation, it should be noted in the Official Report that I was a very willing victim. Laughter.
Willie Rennie LD
That is what all hostages say, so we should express our concern about Daniel Johnson’s future.Beth Morrison’s campaign has been going on for 11 years, and an...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
We move to the open debate.15:28
Paul McLennan (East Lothian) (SNP) SNP
I thank Daniel Johnson for his work to introduce the bill. As the MSP for East Lothian, I am proud to support the bill on behalf of the children and young pe...
Douglas Ross (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I rise to make my final speech in the chamber. I chose to speak in this debate, on this subject, for a number of reasons. First, the member in charge proved ...
Martin Whitfield (South Scotland) (Lab) Lab
I ask members to note my entry in the members’ register of interests.As we come to the conclusion of today’s debate, I rise to offer the full support of Scot...
Roz McCall (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
First, I congratulate Daniel Johnson, the non-Government bills unit and everyone involved in getting this important bill to this stage. I am deeply impressed...
Fergus Ewing (Inverness and Nairn) (Ind) Ind
Does the member agree not only that Mr Ross is an outstanding and fearless parliamentarian—as we must all agree, whatever our views—but that he has, as I kno...
Roz McCall Con
I thank Fergus Ewing for that intervention. I cannot disagree with a single word that he said. In the work that I have tried to take forward with the ministe...
Jenny Gilruth SNP
I start by making it absolutely clear that all of Scotland’s children deserve and have the right to feel safe in our schools. They should not be restrained o...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
I call Daniel Johnson, the member in charge, to wind up the debate.15:51
Daniel Johnson Lab
The challenge in summing up a stage 3 debate for my own member’s bill is to prevent that from becoming akin to a gushing Oscar acceptance speech. I will ther...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
That concludes the debate on Restraint and Seclusion in Schools (Scotland) Bill at stage 3. It is time to move on to the next item of business. There will be...