Meeting of the Parliament 19 March 2026 [Draft]
Christine Grahame’s intervention picks up on the workload that conveners have to take on. As an innocent, naive convener at the start of the session, I had not appreciated the phenomenal workload. I accepted that as I became experienced, because, as Christine Grahame says, a good convener can make for a very good committee.
A number of people who responded to our call for evidence suggested that there should be recompense to reflect that workload. However, after discussion, we thought that that was a step too far and was too challenging at this stage. The process of electing conveners would allow for such a discussion in the future if members wanted to pursue it.