Meeting of the Parliament 19 March 2026 [Draft]
Amendment 35 is my only amendment to the bill, so I will just speak briefly to it.
Section 8 of the bill, which deals with assignations to family members, will amend the 1993 act. The bill, as amended at stage 2, will insert two new subsections in section 8 of the act.
The 1993 act prevents a crofter from assigning their croft unless consent is received by the commission. It requires the crofter to apply for consent and specifies what the commission must do if the croft in question is unregistered.
The bill as amended outlines what action must be taken if the commission is satisfied that certain conditions have been met in relation to an unregistered croft. One of those conditions is that
“the proposed assignee is not entered in the Register of Crofts as the tenant or owner-occupier crofter of three or more crofts”.
My amendment 35 would delete that.
There are two reasons for deleting the condition. First, there is a concern that, if it remains in the bill, the process of transferring crofts could be slowed down in certain circumstances, whereas the original idea was to speed things up.
Secondly—this is the main reason for lodging the amendment—crofters have been in touch with me to say that, with regard to the stipulation that the proposed assignee should not have three or more crofts, three is an arbitrary number and fails to consider regional diversity in croft ownership, particularly in some of our island areas.
Therefore, I propose that the condition should be deleted to speed things up and recognise regional difference.