Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 17 Apr 2026 – 17 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 17 March 2026 [Draft]

17 Mar 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill: Stage 3

Amendment 7 is similar to the amendment that I lodged at stage 2. It relates to transitional arrangements. The amendment would exempt from the levy a new residential unit where a building warrant application has been submitted on or before 1 April 2028—in other words, where a development has progressed before the legislation’s commencement date. The approach matches the established principle that regulatory treatment follows the rules that are in force at the time of a building warrant application, and it recognises the significant up-front investment in viability decisions that are taken without published levy rates.

Home builders have been clear in explaining that development does not simply start when the foundations are cut. There are years of planning processes, as well as investment, before buildings are constructed. The liability date ignores the investment in the land deal, ground investigations, planning costs and professional fees for design that a developer has already borne before they start building and well before the building is completed.

A retrospective levy risks stalling delivery and hindering much-needed investment. I am certain that the minister does not wish the building of homes to be stalled, considering that the next Government needs to deliver at pace to tackle the housing emergency that Michael Marra has just outlined in his speech.

The minister has agreed to provide 22 months’ notice of rates from June this year, but there has been no consideration that developers will already have appraised and agreed land deals without taking into account the fact that the levy will come into effect from April 2028.

Homes for Scotland has been crystal clear that, without transitional arrangements in place, neither it nor the wider sector can support the bill in principle. I take the opportunity at this point to thank Homes for Scotland for its support and engagement throughout the passage of the bill.

It is for those reasons that I urge the Parliament to agree to my amendment 7 or to amendment 6 in the name of Michael Marra. I believe that both amendments attempt to resolve the outstanding issues. I will leave my remarks there.

In the same item of business

16:36
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is stage 3 consideration of the Building Safety Levy (Scotland) Bill.In dealing with the amendments, members should have the bill a...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
Group 1 is on the application of the levy, exemptions and reliefs. Amendment 6, in the name of Michael Marra, is grouped with amendments 7 to 10, 5, 15 and 18.
Michael Marra (North East Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Scotland has been in the grip of a housing emergency for years. Even the Scottish National Party Government acknowledged in May 2024 that that was the case, ...
Meghan Gallacher (Central Scotland) (Con) Con
Amendment 7 is similar to the amendment that I lodged at stage 2. It relates to transitional arrangements. The amendment would exempt from the levy a new res...
Michelle Thomson (Falkirk East) (SNP) SNP
I rise to speak to amendments 8, 10 and 15 in regard to a crucial part of the residential housing market: first-time buyers. At stage 2—I stand by this—I not...
Liz Smith (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Con
As the minister knows from stage 2, I have concerns about whether people involved in the conversion of historic buildings will face specific unintended conse...
Paul Sweeney (Glasgow) (Lab) Lab
It is important to note that Historic Environment Scotland has very high thresholds for designating and listing buildings and that it would be unusual for it...
Liz Smith Con
I understand that but, in relation to our engagement at stage 2 and particularly what the Parliament has said on other issues relating to historic buildings,...
The Minister for Public Finance (Ivan McKee) SNP
I thank members for their engagement with and scrutiny of the bill so far; in particular, I thank those members who met me in advance to discuss their propos...
Patrick Harvie (Glasgow) (Green) Green
I will briefly express a little surprise, if that is not too strong a word, at the number of members who seem to accept the talking points of the constructio...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
I invite Michael Marra to wind up and to press or withdraw amendment 6.
Michael Marra Lab
At the outset, I am disappointed that the minister has not recognised the context in which we address the bill. He has spoken no words at all on the scale of...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind) Ind
Does Michael Marra accept that the Parliament has been put into a bit of a corner by Westminster and that we have had to have such a bill, which might not ha...
Michael Marra Lab
No, I do not really accept that. At the moment, the limiting factor on the rate of our delivery of cladding improvements in Scotland is not the availability ...
Michelle Thomson SNP
As a point of accuracy, surely Michael Marra recognises that it is complete nonsense to use population share to arrive at a figure of £30 million.
Michael Marra Lab
Michelle Thomson is correct that the Government has pursued the matter on a completely nonsensical basis. The £30 million is the Scottish Government’s figure...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The question is, that amendment 6 be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
There will be a division.As this is the first division of stage 3, I will suspend proceedings for around five minutes, to allow members to access the digital...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
We move to the division on amendment 6. Members should cast their votes now.The vote is closed.
Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab) Lab
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I am afraid that my app would not connect. I would have voted yes.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
Thank you. I will make sure that that is recorded.
Fulton MacGregor (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP) SNP
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. I could not connect. I would have voted no.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
Thank you. I will make sure that that is recorded.
ForBaillie, Jackie (Dumbarton) (Lab)Baker, Claire (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab)Boyack, Sarah (Lothian) (Lab)Briggs, Miles (Lothian) (Con)Burnett, Alexander (...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The result of the division is: For 47, Against 67, Abstentions 0.Amendment 6 disagreed to.17:00Section 5—Exempt new residential unitsAmendment 7 moved—Meghan...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The question is, that amendment 7 be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
There will be a division.The vote is closed.
Daniel Johnson (Edinburgh Southern) (Lab) Lab
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. My app did not refresh in time. I would have voted yes.
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
Thank you, Mr Johnson. I will make sure that that is recorded.