Meeting of the Parliament 13 March 2026 [Draft]
I do not consider that to be acceptable whatsoever. The point that I am trying to make is that we want to ensure that the bill includes the most robust safeguards. My contention is that clear, accurate and comprehensive reporting would be a significant part of that provision.
Amendment 295, in the name of Murdo Fraser, and my amendment 275 would better ensure that suicide prevention support for those who are vulnerable is available to people who are considering taking their own lives. Having reviews would mean that the Government would be better equipped to take corrective measures when issues arose, if the bill was passed. Safeguarding must be at the heart of any legislation that relates to the use of lethal drugs.
I will pick up on a couple of the points that were made during members’ contributions. Returning to amendment 64, I completely agree with the points that Bob Doris made about the importance of having qualitative data rather than just numbers. That is worth drawing out in the debate, although I acknowledge the points that have been made about the difficulty and the practicalities that might be involved in collecting the data that is set out in amendment 64. I am also drawn to Bob Doris’s comments about amendment 296, which I will certainly reflect on.
In closing, although I urge members to support the amendments in this group, I must warn that they can go only so far in pushing back against the incrementalism that could arise if we chose to endorse people taking their lives by voting to pass the bill.
I press amendment 275.