Meeting of the Parliament 12 March 2026 [Draft]
I rise to speak along similar lines to those taken by my colleagues. We are debating an important group of amendments. We must ensure that there are strong and secure safeguards, that there is professional accountability and, most importantly, as Mr Whittle said, that there is protection for patients in the bill.
Amendment 235 addresses a critical point about the initiation of any discussion of assisted dying. I absolutely agree with Mr Whittle so, if members are not minded to support my amendments, I urge them to support those from Mr Johnson and Mr Whittle because, taken together, they would strengthen the bill.
The law must ensure that only the individual can raise the subject of assisted dying. Allowing healthcare professionals to introduce that topic without boundaries could be subtle coercion, particularly for vulnerable individuals, and could influence someone to consider assisted dying when they had had no prior intention of that. We previously heard from Mr Carson about a situation in which his mother had a proposition put to her by a doctor and followed it because he was the doctor and he would know best. I fear that that could happen here.