Meeting of the Parliament 12 March 2026 [Draft]
Based on a previous intervention, I will go back to amendment 199.
My reading of amendment 199 is that, if a person goes to their doctor and says, “I am thinking about an assisted death—can you help me in any way in relation to that?”, the doctor would not be able to say, “There are advocacy services available—would you like to avail yourself of them?”, because the person is only considering it. However, if the person went to their doctor and said, “I want an assisted death,” the doctor would be able to say, “Here are some advocacy services.”
That does not seem to be the right way forward. I would have thought that advocacy services would help a person reach their decision in an informed way and advocate for them on that basis, without any predetermined outcome, but amendment 199 would seem to reverse that in some way.