Meeting of the Parliament 12 March 2026 [Draft]
The Law Society was concerned that the relationship that would be required between the proxy and the individual requesting an assisted death would be more extensive as a result of the way in which the provision is now phrased, following stage 2. Rather than simply involving the proxy in a facilitative role, it would require an assessment to be made of the individual’s state of mind, which is not the role of the proxy. The witnesses and the medics who were involved in the process would provide the safeguards. As I said, Ross Greer helpfully indicated that the provisions on coercion would still apply across the board.
As I said, amendment 94 reflects the concerns that the Law Society expressed at stages 1 and 2. I am satisfied, as I think the Law Society is, that amendment 94 would address those concerns. Therefore, I urge members to support amendment 94, and my amendments 65 and 68, and to reject the other amendments in the group, for the reasons that I have set out.