Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 17 Apr 2026 – 17 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 11 March 2026 [Draft]

11 Mar 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Business Motions

My apologies to colleagues for taking additional time at this late hour, but I hope for some understanding when they hear the seriousness of the issue that has led to my amendment. The amendment seeks to add a statement on the urgent situation regarding the Baird family hospital and the Aberdeen and north centre for haematology, oncology and radiotherapy, which is known as the ANCHOR centre, and I hope that there will be cross-party support for it.

I put my request through the proper channels at the bureau, which was denied. Although I welcome the offer to meet Neil Gray, I am afraid that, given that we are at the end of this session of Parliament, the seriousness of the issue and the possible opening of the ANCHOR centre in July mean that greater scrutiny is required, because what is at stake here is a repeat of the tragedy that occurred in the Queen Elizabeth university hospital.

For context, the Baird family hospital and the ANCHOR centre are now six years behind schedule and more than £330 million over budget. Some of these costs are inflationary, but some are due to contractors ripping out newly installed works because designs were not approved, materials were not protected and clinical sign-off was not obtained. The financial waste itself would normally necessitate a ministerial statement—the overrun is five times NHS Grampian’s deficit, and the board is in special measures due to serious financial issues.

However, more worrying than financial incompetence is the serious health and safety concerns that are not being shared with the public, which have come to light in a whistleblower’s report, of which I have a shortened version with me.

The report on NHS Grampian, which was commissioned by NHS Highland, reveals a host of failures in the design and construction of these sites in Aberdeen. There are concerns from expert eyewitnesses about a catalogue of mistakes around ventilation, mould and flood risk at facilities where children and cancer patients will soon go to get better.

The report upholds complaints relating to ventilation and water cleanliness during critical parts of the Baird family hospital and ANCHOR design and construction phases. That includes that the healthcare associated infection system for controlling risk in the built environment—HIA-SCRIBE—guidance was not followed; that the infection prevention control team was not listened to; that public money has been wasted due to HIA-SCRIBE guidance and internal infection prevention and control warnings not being followed; and that patient safety and staff wellbeing have been negatively impacted.

However, this report was denied to me by the chief executive of NHS Grampian. NHS Grampian told me that sharing the report with me would compromise the whistleblower, despite my submitting a consent form from the whistleblower themselves.

The independent national whistleblowing officer has now taken the step of having to extract the full report from NHS Grampian, which will not even release the details to the person who made the complaints and compiled all the evidence. They were told during the process that information contained in the report could never leave the top tiers of NHS Grampian—the insinuation being that that would create some kind of tidal wave of job losses.

The whistleblowing officer, in a departure from their usual process, has contacted NHS Grampian with urgent questions to be answered by this Friday. That departure from normal procedure follows a meeting to discuss the high risks—the imminent opening of the buildings, the on-going failure to address infection prevention and control risks in the Baird family hospital and the ANCHOR centre, and the on-going water safety concerns.

The whistleblowing officer has also been in contact with Healthcare Improvement Scotland and NHS Scotland Assure about their concerns. The whistleblower met the chief executive and director of improvement at NHS Grampian last week, who apologised for what has happened and acknowledged that concerns were not listened to. They assured the whistleblower that they plan to change the culture and improve governance.

The powers that be have apologised to the whistleblower, who was a respected practitioner in the national health service for many years, because they could see NHS Scotland Assure making exactly the same mistakes that it was set up to avoid—mistakes that made children ill in 2017 and resulted in the deaths of children and adults, with repercussions that are still being felt years later.

If NHS Grampian can see that change is needed, and if the independent national whistleblowing officer is concerned enough to depart from normal processes, should the health secretary not explain to the Parliament his knowledge of the issue; whether he can provide a cast-iron guarantee that all infection control measures have been resolved; and whether Lord Brodie’s recommendations will be 100 per cent acted on? We need to know that the Government’s mistakes have been learned from and that the hospital will be the very best hospital that it can be for decades to come, and will save thousands of lives without harming a single one.

I ask members to back my amendment and ensure that the tragedy of the Queen Elizabeth university hospital will not be repeated.

I move amendment S6M-21035.1, to insert after second “followed by Topical Questions”:

“followed by Ministerial Statement: Update on Baird Family Hospital and ANCHOR Centre”.

References in this contribution

Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.

In the same item of business

21:25
The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is consideration of business motion S6M-21077, in the name of Graeme Dey, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, setting out a busi...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call Jeremy Balfour.21:26
Jeremy Balfour (Lothian) (Ind) Ind
I rise to challenge the motion and to question whether this is the right way forward for the Parliament. I understand where we are and the issues that we hav...
John Mason (Glasgow Shettleston) (Ind) Ind
I largely agree with what Jeremy Balfour is saying, but we are where we are. Does he have a suggestion of when would be a better time for us to meet?
Jeremy Balfour Ind
I appreciate that we have to meet, but notice is the key factor. Moving business to Monday would have given people more time to get the appropriate care in p...
Ross Greer (West Scotland) (Green) Green
Will the member give way?
Jeremy Balfour Ind
I will finish this point, and then I will give way.People need notice, because many people cannot change their arrangements at the drop of a hat. I am not su...
Ross Greer Green
I have real sympathy with the argument that Jeremy Balfour lays out. Frankly, it was obvious at the start of the week that this was going to happen, and a de...
Jeremy Balfour Ind
I absolutely agree with Ross Greer. If we were to move stage 3 proceedings to Monday, we have the Tuesday the week after, when we are due to finish at 5 o’cl...
Graham Simpson (Central Scotland) (Reform) Reform
Does Jeremy Balfour agree that attendance is bound to be down on Friday, which makes a mockery of the whole process of what is a very important bill? Does he...
Jeremy Balfour Ind
I cannot comment on what the attendance will or will not be. All I know is that there will be people who want to be here but cannot be here, because they eit...
Kevin Stewart (Aberdeen Central) (SNP) SNP
I understand what Mr Balfour is saying, but the reality is quite simply that there is no ideal time for some of us who have to travel further distances. That...
Jeremy Balfour Ind
I do not want to labour the point at half past 9, but I will respond to Mr Stewart by saying that there is a difference between someone having to travel a di...
The Presiding Officer NPA
You must wind up, Mr Balfour.
Jeremy Balfour Ind
I say to Mr Stewart that, yes, we have a job to do, but the trouble is that, if we decide tonight to deal with that business on Friday, we will prevent peopl...
Jackie Baillie (Dumbarton) (Lab) Lab
These are, of course, serious and substantial issues that we are being asked to consider. In my view, this is the most consequential member’s bill of the ses...
Edward Mountain (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
This is a difficult problem for the Parliamentary Bureau to wrestle with. I will not be clever and try to suggest all sorts of answers. However, one thing th...
Jackie Baillie Lab
I agree, but I have not suggested that we do that. There are some evenings when we are not sitting until 10 o’clock that are part of the normal parliamentary...
Douglas Ross (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I understand and respect the points made by Jeremy Balfour and others. I want to make a few points myself.First, in some of the interventions on Mr Balfour, ...
Ross Greer Green
Mr Ross said that we were due to debate the bill until 10 o’clock this evening. My understanding is that an hour had already been allocated for multiple Scot...
Douglas Ross Con
I do not have the business bulletin in front of me, but my understanding is that that was to take place after we reached the 10 o’clock deadline for decision...
Keith Brown (Clackmannanshire and Dunblane) (SNP) SNP
Rather than talk about the Parliamentary Bureau and the Government, every single one of us needs to look at ourselves with regard to what we might have done ...
Jeremy Balfour Ind
Will the member take an intervention?
Keith Brown SNP
I will just finish the point that I want to make. Friday is the 30th anniversary of the Dunblane tragedy, which is in my constituency. It is odd, of course, ...
Jeremy Balfour Ind
Again, I do not want to labour this point—well, I am labouring it—but can Keith Brown not see that it is different when someone wants to do their job but is ...
Keith Brown SNP
I have already conceded the point that I recognise the difficulties that Jeremy Balfour and other members have pointed out, and it is unfortunate that meetin...
Christine Grahame (Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale) (SNP) SNP
I am a bit bewildered about the issue of caring responsibilities. I regard Friday as a working day, just as being in the Parliament today and tomorrow are wo...
Paul O’Kane (West Scotland) (Lab) Lab
Will the member take an intervention?
Christine Grahame SNP
I will just finish this point, Mr O’Kane. We have had lengthy debates on some amendments, some of which went over and over the same subjects, which made a mo...