Meeting of the Parliament 11 March 2026 [Draft]
Daniel Johnson referred to my amendment 37, on the medical practitioner’s report. He appeared to be supportive of it, but he was concerned that such provision could be overly burdensome or bureaucratic. I reassure him that amendment 67 would allow the Scottish Government to set out in regulations the details of such a report so that that would not be the case. I hope that, on reflection, he will support amendment 37 and its consequential amendments, because it would surely be important to have a rationale for the decision that the co-ordinating medical practitioner arrived at.