Meeting of the Parliament 10 March 2026 [Draft]
From a personal point of view, these amendments are swings and roundabouts. Having listened to Pam Duncan-Glancy’s powerful speech, my question to her is this: would she say that the fear of that sort of unintentional reinforcement by others of an assumption about her quality of life challenges the wording that has been chosen for the amendment? When we consider the issue from a human rights basis, or even when we consider the Children (Care, Care Experience and Services Planning) (Scotland) Bill, which will come before the Parliament at stage 3 next week, should the choice be to try to give dignity and autonomy without such prejudice?