Meeting of the Parliament 25 February 2026 [Draft]
Anything that undermines that or gives the perception of undermining that is a legitimate matter of inquiry for the Parliament.
There are serious questions that still require to be asked. This cannot be the end of the matter. We have not heard convincing answers from the Lord Advocate to questions put by my colleague Stephen Kerr, my colleagues on the Labour benches or me. The issue needs full exposure, not cover-up.
I move amendment S6M-20898.1, to insert after “That the Parliament agrees”:
“(za) the following revision to the programme of business for Thursday 26 February 2026—
delete
followed by Business Motions
followed by Parliamentary Bureau Motions
5.30 pm Decision Time
and insert
followed by Ministerial Statement: Lord Advocate Communications with the First Minister Regarding Court Cases, including on Peter Murrell
followed by Business Motions
followed by Parliamentary Bureau Motions
6.00 pm Decision Time”.
Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.