Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Committee

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee 24 February 2026 [Draft]

24 Feb 2026 · S6 · Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Item of business
Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2
Good morning, and welcome to the ninth meeting in 2026 of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee. I have received no apologies.Our first and only agenda item is consideration of the Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill at stage 2. I will briefly explain, for anyone watching, the procedure that we will be following during today’s proceedings.Members should have with them a copy of the bill, the marshalled list and the groupings. Those documents are available on the bill web page on the Scottish Parliament’s website, for anyone observing.I will call each amendment individually in the order on the marshalled list. The member who has lodged the amendment should either move it or say, “Not moved,” when it is called. If that member does not move the amendment, any other member present may do so.The groupings of amendments set out the order in which they will be debated. There will be one debate on each group of amendments. In each debate, I will call the member who lodged the first amendment in the group to speak to and move that amendment and to speak to all other amendments in the group. I will then call other members with amendments in the group to speak to—but not to move—their amendments and to speak to other amendments in the group if they wish to do so.I will then call any other member who wishes to speak in the debate. Members wishing to speak should indicate as much by catching my attention or the attention of the clerk. I will then call the minister, if she has not already spoken in the debate.Finally, I will call the member who moved the first amendment in the group to wind up and to indicate whether they wish to press or withdraw the amendment. If the amendment is pressed, I will put the question on it. If a member seeks to withdraw an amendment after it has been moved and debated, I will ask whether any member present objects. If there is an objection, I will immediately put the question on the amendment. Later amendments in the group are not debated again when they are reached. If they are moved, I will put the question on them straight away.If there is a division, only committee members are entitled to vote. Voting is by a show of hands. It is important that members keep their hands raised clearly until the clerk has recorded their names. If there is a tie, I must exercise a casting vote.The committee is also required to consider and decide on each section of and schedule to the bill and the long title. I will put the question on each of those provisions at the appropriate point.At the bill’s introduction, the Presiding Officer determined that a financial resolution was not required for it. Under rule 9.12.6C of standing orders, the Presiding Officer has determined that the costs associated with amendment 105 would exceed the current threshold at which a bill requires a financial resolution. Therefore, in stage 2 proceedings, amendment 105 may be debated but may not be agreed to in the absence of a financial resolution.The Presiding Officer has also ruled that amendments 36, 37, 50, 52, 54, 93, 94, 98 to 100, 104, 28, 106, 59, 107 to 111 and 35 are cost-bearing amendments. However, the potential cumulative cost of the amendments would not require a financial resolution. As such, those amendments and any amendments that would be consequential on them will be debated and the questions will be put on them as normal at stage 2.Section 1—Meaning of “non-surgical procedure”

In the same item of business

The Convener (Clare Haughey) SNP
Good morning, and welcome to the ninth meeting in 2026 of the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee. I have received no apologies.Our first and only agenda...
The Convener SNP
Amendment 5, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 28, 30 and 34.
The Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health (Jenni Minto) SNP
As this is the first group of amendments to be considered, I will make some quick general comments. I thank committee members for their consideration to date...
The Convener SNP
No other member has indicated that they wish to speak to amendment 5. I call the minister to wind up.
Jenni Minto SNP
:The amendments are necessary to meet the ambition to set training standards in the future.Amendment 5 agreed to.
The Convener SNP
Amendment 6, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 7, 8, 64, 65, 36, 37, 10, 38, 11 to 17, 39 and 18 to 21.
Jenni Minto SNP
:I am pleased to speak to this group, which includes amendments on several issues relating to the fundamental definition of a non-surgical procedure. I will ...
Sandesh Gulhane (Glasgow) (Con) Con
I declare an interest as a practising national health service general practitioner.I will start with amendment 6, and I would like to directly ask the minist...
Maurice Golden (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
As a result of an article appearing in a national newspaper today, I should put on the record that my girlfriend works in the aesthetics sector. Private live...
Jeremy Balfour (Lothian) (Ind) Ind
Good morning to the minister and her team.My amendments are the result of, first, my discussions with a number of constituents who have raised concerns with ...
Joe FitzPatrick (Dundee City West) (SNP) SNP
I am very sympathetic to Dr Gulhane’s amendments 64 and 65. I wonder whether the minister would consider agreeing to discuss those amendments further with Dr...
Jenni Minto SNP
:I am grateful to members for their contributions to the discussion on this group, which covers some very important issues. The complexity of aspects of the ...
Sandesh Gulhane Con
:Would the minister consider changing “clinical trial” in amendment 6 to “regulated clinical trial”?
Jenni Minto SNP
:I would be very happy to discuss that with Dr Gulhane in the lead-up to stage 3.I am content to consider discussions with Mr Balfour on his amendment 37, be...
The Convener SNP
Amendment 9, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendments 9, 22, 22A to 22D, 40, 23, 68, 69, 24, 41, 71, 25, 42, 43, 73, 44, 31, 112, 113, 60 and ...
Jenni Minto SNP
:This group of amendments goes to the heart of the bill. It contains amendments to section 4, which sets out the most important public safety provisions on w...
The Convener SNP
Maurice Golden will speak to amendment 22A and other amendments in the group.
Maurice Golden Con
:I have lodged probing amendments on two areas, the first of which is permitted premises. The rationale behind those amendments is that they would allow perm...
Stuart McMillan (Greenock and Inverclyde) (SNP) SNP
Before I speak about amendment 22C, I thank the minister for taking the bill forward and for listening to concerns from the sector. Safety is the paramount d...
Sandesh Gulhane Con
:I will make general comments on this group of amendments. If we are talking about permitted premises under HIS standards, we are saying that a basic standar...
Emma Harper (South Scotland) (SNP) SNP
Botulinum toxin comes in a multidose vial, so one vial would be used for more than one person. That raises issues of the traceability of that vial, its expir...
Sandesh Gulhane Con
:I would agree. Further, the documentation about when the vial came out of the fridge and went back in the fridge, and how long it had been open for, is vita...
Jenni Minto SNP
:I am grateful to members for the points that they have raised and I urge them to support amendments 9, 22 to 25 and 31. I ask Maurice Golden and Stuart McMi...
The Convener SNP
Does Sandesh Gulhane wish to move amendment 64?
Sandesh Gulhane Con
:I feel that removing osteopaths from the bill is important, so I move amendment 64.
The Convener SNP
The question is, that amendment 64 be agreed to. Are we agreed?Members: No.
The Convener SNP
There will be a division.
ForGulhane, Sandesh (Glasgow) (Con)Whittle, Brian (South Scotland) (Con)AgainstFitzPatrick, Joe (Dundee City West) (SNP)Harper, Emma (South Scotland) (SNP)Ha...
The Convener SNP
The result of the division is: For 2, Against 8, Abstentions 0.Amendment 64 disagreed to.Amendments 65 and 36 not moved.
The Convener SNP
Does Jeremy Balfour wish to move amendment 37?