Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 19 February 2026 [Draft]

19 Feb 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Public Services (Funding)
Kerr, Liam Con North East Scotland Watch on SPTV

The motion poses a simple question about whether the way in which the SNP Government chooses to distribute its record funding among our local authorities, NHS boards and infrastructure investment projects is a fair distribution. Those are all devolved services, as Karen Adam would know if she bothered to learn how devolution and funding work.

Presiding Officer, the north-east has such a consistent and sustained imbalance of distribution that the dogs on Union Street would tell you that we do not get a fair distribution. For example, for more than a decade, NHS Grampian has received less than the level of funding that is required by the Government’s own allocation model. Since 2010, the disparity between needed and actual funding is around £250 million. That funding shortfall has resulted in reports just this week that NHS Grampian is projecting a deficit of £76 million, having made £62 million-worth of savings this year and needing a further £40 million of savings next year. That translates to the fewest beds per head in Scotland. It means delayed projects, stacked ambulances and enormous waiting lists for people in the north-east.

The funding shortfall embeds pressure across the system, because NHS Grampian funds a significant share of Aberdeen city and Aberdeenshire health and social care partnerships. Due to NHS Grampian starting from a low financial position, with its below-target allocation, the HSCPs, too, are under strain. Care provision tightens, recruitment becomes challenging and local urgent care services operate with limited flexibility. Those are entirely predictable consequences of sustained unfair underallocation by this Government.

Our north-east local councils face the same unfairness. Aberdeenshire Council is the fourth lowest-funded local authority per head in Scotland, receiving less than the national average. Aberdeen City Council also ranks among the lower-funded councils. Both have been consistently almost the worst-funded—if not the worst-funded—councils in Scotland for years. Starting from a lower funding baseline immediately limits what local services can be delivered effectively. Karen Adam desperately tries to say that it is nothing to do with the Scottish Parliament, but that is not standing up for her constituents; that is abandoning them, yet again.

As the motion highlights, the unfairness extends to infrastructure investment in the north-east, or lack thereof. To the south of Aberdeen, the growing communities of Cove and Newtonhill, which sit directly on the east coast main line, need new stations. People have been demanding them for years, and several thousands have signed my campaign petition to deliver them. However, the Government refuses to deliver, just as it will not address our poor local and regional bus services or deliver the vital upgrades that are so desperately needed on the A90 and the Laurencekirk, Toll of Birness and Cortes junctions.

When communities lack proper transport infrastructure, the result is congestion, pressure on local roads and reduced economic activity. Earlier today, when I asked the minister whether, in response to the tsunami of pub and hospitality closures in Aberdeen and the north-east, he would support Scottish Conservative plans to exempt most from business rates, he blithely ignored the issue, failed to provide any solutions and completely ignored the question about whether he would support that.

North East Scotland is a region that contributes significantly to Scotland’s economy, its energy, its food production and its advanced manufacturing and research. We in the north-east have an expectation—actually, a right to expect—that our essential services and infrastructure are funded in line with assessed requirements.

The fact is that fairness to the whole of Scotland should be baked into decisions that the Scottish Government makes. The sustained gap in the north-east demonstrates that it is not—that is not what is being delivered. We need a commitment to fairness for communities across the north-east and a Government that finally delivers a fair share for the north-east.

13:05

In the same item of business

The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
The next item of business is a members’ business debate on motion S6M-20268, in the name of Alexander Burnett, on a fair share of funding for public services...
Alexander Burnett (Aberdeenshire West) (Con) Con
I thank those who have supported the motion, which echoes a joint statement put out by 22 community councils in Aberdeenshire. For 19 years, Scotland has str...
Karen Adam (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP) SNP
I am grateful to have the opportunity to debate the motion, and I thank Alexander Burnett for bringing it to the chamber. However, there is something quite i...
Liam Kerr (North East Scotland) (Con) Con
The motion poses a simple question about whether the way in which the SNP Government chooses to distribute its record funding among our local authorities, NH...
Davy Russell (Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse) (Lab) Lab
I thank Alexander Burnett for bringing the debate to the chamber. It is on a wee subject that is dear to my heart, as I have over 40 years of experience in t...
Tim Eagle (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I thank Alex Burnett for bringing this crucial debate to the chamber. I must admit that I am still a little bit dizzy from Karen Adam’s speech. My word—that ...
Karen Adam SNP
Will the member take an intervention?
Tim Eagle Con
I am not allowing Karen Adam an intervention. She would not take an intervention from any of us.The 2026-27 budget is another dire one that will force all co...
Maggie Chapman (North East Scotland) (Green) Green
I am grateful to Alexander Burnett for the opportunity to speak in this debate for the communities of the north-east, and particularly the people of Aberdeen...
Sharon Dowey (South Scotland) (Con) Con
I thank my colleague Alexander Burnett for bringing this debate to the chamber.Many of the issues that have been highlighted in Aberdeenshire are also presen...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
I call Ivan McKee to respond to the debate. Minister, you have around seven minutes.13:21
The Minister for Public Finance (Ivan McKee) SNP
I will come on to members’ contributions shortly, but I will first cover off some general points.The Government recognises the essential role that local auth...
Liam Kerr Con
Among all the statistics that the minister is trotting out, let us get specific. How would he suggest that NHS Grampian makes a further £40 million of cuts n...
Ivan McKee SNP
I was just coming on to that point. The board was escalated to stage 4 of the NHS Scotland support and intervention framework in May 2025 in order to provide...
Tim Eagle Con
I want to focus on that point, because it is crucial. I came down to the Parliament in 2018 to discuss it with the then Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the...
Ivan McKee SNP
I have identified that Aberdeenshire Council receives additional funding due to its rural nature. It is interesting to get it on the record that the Conserva...
Tim Eagle Con
That is not what I said.
Ivan McKee SNP
That is exactly what he said. I think that COSLA would have something to say about that.Under the two existing formulas, the additional cost of providing ser...
The Deputy Presiding Officer (Liam McArthur) LD
That concludes the debate. I suspend the meeting until 2.30 pm.13:29Meeting suspended.14:30On resuming—