Holyrood, made browsable

Hansard

Every contribution to the Official Report — chamber and committee — searchable in one place. Pulled from data.parliament.scot, indexed for full-text search, linked through to every MSP.

129
Current MSPs
415
MSPs ever elected
13
Parties on record
2,355,091
Hansard contributions
1999–2026
Coverage span
Official Report

Search Hansard contributions

Clear
Showing 0 of 2,355,091 contributions in session S6, 16 Apr 2026 – 16 May 2026. Latest 30 days: 148. Coverage: 12 May 1999 — 14 May 2026.

No contributions match those filters.

← Back to list
Chamber

Meeting of the Parliament 18 February 2026 [Draft]

18 Feb 2026 · S6 · Meeting of the Parliament
Item of business
Business Motion
Ross, Douglas Con Highlands and Islands Watch on SPTV

I have said that I will give way in a minute.

The Lord Advocate was so concerned that Scotland’s First Minister would speak inappropriately about the case that he had to be briefed about it. We also do not know whether the Lord Advocate has any concerns about the fact that the First Minister, on receiving that email—I note that his chief of staff came into the chamber just a few moments ago—forwarded it on to SNP special advisers 31 minutes later. Did the Lord Advocate, in sharing that information with the First Minister of Scotland, believe that it would be shared with political special advisers? Those are all points that the Parliament deserves to hear about. That is why urgent questions were lodged today, but, even at the end of that process, we have so many unanswered questions for the Lord Advocate.

In conclusion, I repeat that a full statement from the Lord Advocate is needed tomorrow, to provide answers. If the Lord Advocate and SNP members are happy that nothing has gone wrong and that everything is perfectly acceptable and above board, they should come to the Parliament to tell us that. The Lord Advocate should come to the Parliament, give a statement and allow questions to be put, because, even after today’s urgent question, many queries remain. Many queries that were put to the Lord Advocate were not answered and MSPs have been promised that many pieces of information will come later today. Therefore, we should be able to challenge the Lord Advocate on those points tomorrow. Ultimately, if there is nothing to see or hide, why not come back tomorrow, deliver a statement and be questioned?

I move amendment S6M-20826.1, to insert after “That the Parliament agrees—”:

“(za) the following revision to the programme of business for Thursday 19 February 2026—

delete

2.30 pm Parliamentary Bureau Motions

2.30 pm Portfolio Questions: Education and Skills

and insert

2.00 pm Parliamentary Bureau Motions

2.00 pm Portfolio Questions: Education and Skills

followed by Ministerial Statement: Lord Advocate Private Briefing to the First Minister on the Charges Against Peter Murrell”.

References in this contribution

Motions, questions or amendments mentioned by their reference code.

In the same item of business

The Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone) NPA
The next item of business is consideration of business motion S6M-20826, in the name of Graeme Dey, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, setting out a busi...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call Douglas Ross to speak to and move amendment S6M-20826.1.17:40
Douglas Ross (Highlands and Islands) (Con) Con
I am glad that the Lord Advocate and the Solicitor General remain in the chamber for this debate, because it is a request about the Lord Advocate’s time. I h...
Douglas Ross Con
This is why we need a statement tomorrow.
The Presiding Officer NPA
Let us hear one another.
Douglas Ross Con
It is a serious question. How can the Lord Advocate come to the Parliament and say that the information that she provided to the First Minister in a memo was...
Kevin Stewart (Aberdeen Central) (SNP) SNP
Will the member give way?
Douglas Ross Con
I will give way in a moment.She felt so concerned about the issue that she had to draft a memo to the First Minister. She was concerned that John Swinney wou...
The Presiding Officer NPA
Let us hear one another.
Kevin Stewart SNP
Will the member give way?
Douglas Ross Con
I have said that I will give way in a minute.The Lord Advocate was so concerned that Scotland’s First Minister would speak inappropriately about the case tha...
The Presiding Officer NPA
I call the Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans to respond on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau.17:45
The Minister for Parliamentary Business and Veterans (Graeme Dey) SNP
Douglas Ross’s amendment to the business motion seeks a statement from the Lord Advocate tomorrow on communications in relation to Mr Murrell’s case. However...
Douglas Ross Con
But we did not get answers.
Graeme Dey SNP
If Mr Ross would show a bit of courtesy and listen, that would be useful.
The Presiding Officer NPA
Let us hear the minister.
Graeme Dey SNP
We have had more than enough performative nonsense from Mr Ross.The Lord Advocate answered those questions—
Douglas Ross Con
She did not.
Graeme Dey SNP
—and committed to provide further information in writing. Therefore, MSPs have had an opportunity to provide scrutiny of the Lord Advocate in this area. Give...
Douglas Ross Con
We got no answers.
The Presiding Officer NPA
Mr Ross, please resist the temptation to contribute from your seat.
Graeme Dey SNP
Thank you, Presiding Officer.Members will have the opportunity to explore the issue further at First Minister’s question time tomorrow, if they so wish.Given...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The first question is, that amendment S6M-20826.1, in the name of Douglas Ross, which seeks to amend motion S6M-20826, in the name of Graeme Dey, on behalf o...
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division. There will be a short suspension to allow members to access the digital voting system.17:46Meeting suspended.17:48On resuming—
The Presiding Officer NPA
We move to the division on amendment S6M-20826.1, in the name of Douglas Ross. Members should cast their votes now.
ForBaillie, Jackie (Dumbarton) (Lab)Baker, Claire (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Lab)Bibby, Neil (West Scotland) (Lab)Boyack, Sarah (Lothian) (Lab)Briggs, Miles (L...
The Presiding Officer NPA
The result of the division on amendment S6M-20826.1, in the name of Douglas Ross, is: For 51, Against 71, Abstentions 0.Amendment disagreed to.
The Presiding Officer NPA
The next question is, that motion S6M-20826, in the name of Graeme Dey, on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau, setting out a business programme, be agreed to...
The Presiding Officer NPA
There will be a division.
ForAdam, George (Paisley) (SNP)Adam, Karen (Banffshire and Buchan Coast) (SNP)Adamson, Clare (Motherwell and Wishaw) (SNP)Allan, Alasdair (Na h-Eileanan an I...