Meeting of the Parliament 18 February 2026 [Draft]
The figure appears on the indictment, and it was, therefore, a figure that I was able to share.
As I have said, the fact is that, from the point at which the indictment was served, there was no limitation on its terms being made public, and the timing of my minute to the First Minister, after service of the indictment, reflected that.
It is important to say that I am answering to the Parliament today, but it really is not appropriate to comment on the substance of a live case beyond matters of process. I simply reiterate that it is critically important to protect this live case to ensure that, at the end of the day, justice is served.
I repeat the position, which is this: the key point is that the minute was sent after an independent prosecutor had taken a decision to indict the case. It was not an opportunity to influence this case at all. It was about informing of a significant development, which was, at that stage, entering the public domain. I was seeking to protect the process, because that is what, as Lord Advocate, I am required to do: uphold the rule of law and protect the process.