Meeting of the Parliament 18 February 2026 [Draft]
I echo the colleagues who have rejected the deeply irresponsible allegations of corruption against the Lord Advocate. I accept that there is precedent for informing the First Minister of significant cases, and I welcome that the Lord Advocate is going to supply the Parliament with examples. However, I want to repeat the specifics of Jamie Greene’s question. Although I recognise that the Lord Advocate cannot comment on the specifics of a live case, I am keen to understand not why the First Minister was informed of the developments in this case—I understand that there is precedent for that—but why the detail of the £460,000 figure was included. If the Lord Advocate could explain why that detail was included in the update to the First Minister, I would certainly appreciate further clarification on that point.