Meeting of the Parliament 18 February 2026 [Draft]
The advice was offered on the basis that I am the Lord Advocate and the head of the independent prosecution service.
In relation to the other point, as I have said before, it is normal practice that the sharing of that type of information is done on a case-by-case basis and on the judgment of an independent prosecutor. That is because of the fundamental importance of protecting live proceedings and ensuring that they are not compromised in any way by inappropriate commentary.
It is an important and fundamental aspect of the rule of law that the importance of the contempt of court provisions and the restriction of comments on live cases bears repeating, in order to curb speculation and inappropriate commentary being applied to any live case.
It would not be appropriate for me to give examples of that happening in any particular live case at this stage, without me understanding the impact on the proceedings, as they may have at this stage, but I am happy to share, following on from this evening, information in relation to instances where a similar process has been undertaken in relation to informing the First Minister of important stages in high-profile and sensitive cases.